ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.772
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.772
Généré par l'IA
Constitutional complaint dismissed; administrative act upheld against alleged violation of fundamental rights.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's constitutional complaint regarding an administrative decision. The applicant argued that the act violated their fundamental rights, but the court found no sufficient justification for the measure. Consequently, the administrative act was upheld as lawful and proportionate.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 29 al. 1 Cst.; Art. 29 al. 2 Cst.: A constitutional complaint is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the contested act violates their fundamental rights or if the act is not sufficiently motivated to justify the restriction.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
constitutional complaint
fundamental rights
administrative act
proportionality principle
Conseil d'État
inadmissible complaint
legal basis
respect du délai de recours
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 29 al. 1 Cst.
Art. 29 al. 2 Cst.
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.187
Court dismisses late appeal against planning permit due to proven receipt of decision letter by post.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.243.701
Belgian State appeal dismissed due to missing counter-memorandum within statutory sixty-day deadline.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.246.151
Belgian Council of State dismisses annulation request as non-completed due to unpaid procedural fees.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2019:CONC.20191118.4
Social security institution must prove notification date, not just existence, for appeal deadline calculation.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.864
Court decrees withdrawal of appeal due to failure to pursue proceedings within statutory thirty-day period.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 253.772 von 17 Mai 2022
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)