ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.245.330
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.245.330
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum application, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past experiences, but the court found no credible threat in the current Swiss context. Consequently, the claim was rejected as it lacked the necessary substantiation required under Swiss asylum law.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 100-1 al. 1 LIA; Art. 100-2 LIA: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution with credible evidence.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum application
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
persecution evidence
LIA provisions
Swiss asylum law
discretionary rejection
suppression de l'aide sociale
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 100-1 al. 1 LIA
Art. 100-2 LIA
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2021:ARR.252.328
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.245.462
Constitutional court dismisses asylum claim as applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.241.419
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.262.431
Belgian court annuls urban planning permit due to failure to grant required architectural deviation for non-compliant windows.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.511
Constitutional complaint dismissed; administrative act upheld as lawful under Swiss Federal Constitution.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 245.330 von 29 August 2019
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)