Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181123.7 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181123.7 Généré par l'IA

Dismissal of dismissal for breach of transport rules despite warnings to protected employee.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181123.7
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the employee's claim for dismissal with immediate effect, ruling that the employer failed to prove a valid urgent reason. Although the employee breached procedural rules regarding money transport despite prior warnings, the court found the breach insufficient to justify termination under the law. The decision emphasizes that even serious procedural violations do not automatically constitute an urgent reason for dismissal without further context.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A breach of important procedural rules, even if repeated and warned against, does not constitute an urgent reason for dismissal unless the employer proves the breach fundamentally undermines the employment relationship.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
urgent reason dismissal protected employee status procedural rule breach money transport agent dismissal with immediate effect violation d'obligations contractuelles de travail congé de représailles droits et obligations de l'agent

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.
Généré par l'IA
ECLI:BE:CASS:2004:ARR.20040603.9
Appeal dismissed because the appellate judge delegated substantive legal judgment to an expert, violating the Code of Judicial Procedure.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2007:ARR.20070226.2
Court holds that a serious fault during notice period justifies immediate dismissal without notice or severance pay.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180608.9
Court holds that a mere mention of theft is insufficient for a serious reason dismissal without precise facts.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180508.3
Employee dismissed for intentional professional misconduct by concealing dangerous work conditions as manager.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.239.683
Disciplinary sanction for unannounced strike rejected; court finds no manifest error in employer's refusal to accept force majeure claim.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fiche Is een dringende reden het niet-naleven door een geldtransporteur/ATMagent van procedureregels waarvan het belang zowel in de arbeidsovereenkomst als in een ondertekende charter wordt onderstreept en dit ondanks waarschuwingen. UTU-thesaurus: SOCIAAL RECHT - ARBEID - Bedrijfsorganisatie - Ontslagbescherming personeelsafgevaardigden SOCIAAL RECHT - ARBEID - Arbeidsovereenkomst - Einde (arbeidsovereenkomst) - Ontslag om dringende reden Vrije woorden: ONTSLAG. — Beschermde werknemer. — Dringende reden. — Niet-naleving van belangrijke procedureregels ondanks waarschuwingen.

Annotaties Publicaties: JTT - - 2019-18, 315-317