Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181123.6 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181123.6 Généré par l'IA

Dismissal of dismissal for urgent reason due to unproven conflict between illness absence and side activity.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181123.6
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the employer's claim of dismissal for urgent reason, ruling that the employee's side activity as a hairdresser and manager did not contradict the certified illness absence. Although the side activity violated an exclusivity clause, the employer failed to prove it occurred during the period of certified sickness. Consequently, the dismissal lacked the necessary urgency and justification required by law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 10, § 1, 1° of the Act of 1999 on the protection of employees against dismissal; Art. 10, § 1, 2° of the Act of 1999 on the protection of employees against dismissal: A dismissal for urgent reason is invalid if the employee's side activity during certified illness absence is not proven to contradict that absence, even if the activity violates an exclusivity clause.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dismissal for urgent reason protected employee status side activity during illness exclusivity clause violation burden of proof on employer incapacité de travail médicale congé de maladie inexigible malgré l'atteinte corporelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 10, § 1, 1° of the Act of 1999 on the protection of employees against dismissal
Art. 10, § 1, 2° of the Act of 1999 on the protection of employees against dismissal
Généré par l'IA
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180524.8
Court dismisses dismissal claim as frequent absences due to workload increase are unrelated to career break suspension.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2019:ARR.20190312.6
Work contract terminated by force majeure due to permanent disability; no severance payable.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2023:ARR.20230228.1
Court dismisses employee appeal on termination claims and rejects request to reduce procedural costs.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2023:ARR.20230220.2
Court dismisses employer appeal on severance pay, ruling dismissal for gross misconduct was legally unfounded.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2025:ARR.20251126.1
Court of Labor reformulates judgment dismissing employee's claims while ordering employer to repay overpaid wages.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fiche Is geen dringende reden de beperkte nevenactiviteit van kapper en zaakvoerder van een kapperssalon tijdens de afwezigheid wegens ziekte waarvan niet bewezen is dat ze de afwezigheid wegens ziekte tegenspreekt, hoewel de nevenactiviteit strijdig is met een exclusiviteitsbeding UTU-thesaurus: SOCIAAL RECHT - ARBEID - Bedrijfsorganisatie - Ontslagbescherming personeelsafgevaardigden SOCIAAL RECHT - ARBEID - Arbeidsovereenkomst - Einde (arbeidsovereenkomst) - Ontslag om dringende reden Vrije woorden: ONTSLAG. — Beschermde werknemer. — Dringende reden. — Nevenactiviteit tijdens arbeidsongeschiktheid wegens ziekte.

Annotaties Publicaties: JTT - - 2019-18, 312-315