Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181005.5 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181005.5 Généré par l'IA

Court holds that claims not fixed in a specific sum are still money-valuable if their value can be derived.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20181005.5
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court ruled that a claim is considered money-valuable even if it does not specify an exact monetary amount. The applicant argued that their claim for unspecified damages should qualify for legal costs, while the opposing party contended otherwise. The court decided in favor of the applicant because the underlying value of the claim could be derived from the requested relief.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 17, § 1, 1° of the Law of 16 April 1994 on the organization of the judicial system; A claim is money-valuable if its value can be derived from the request, even without a fixed sum.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
money-valuable claim legal costs unspecified damages judicial proceedings derivable value valeur litigieuse dette d'argent créance contestée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 17, § 1, 1° of the Law of 16 April 1994 on the organization of the judicial system
Généré par l'IA
ECLI:BE:CASS:1999:ARR.19990419.4
Court of Cassation quashes tax on nominal debt value absent actual or presumed enrichment. The court ruled that nominal debt value alone does not constitute taxable income without actual or presumed enrichment. The court held that tax liability requires realized or presumed enrichment, not merely the existence of a nominal debt. The court reversed the lower court's decision to tax the nominal value of the debt without evidence of actual or presumed enrichment. The court emphasized that tax liability requires realized or presumed enrichment, not merely the existence of a nominal debt. The court reversed the lower court's decision to tax the nominal value of the debt without evidence of actual or presumed enrichment. The court emphasized that tax liability requires realized or presumed enrichment, not merely the existence of a nominal debt.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2025:CONC.20250103.1N.4
Court of Cassation rules procedural fees in appeal must reflect monetary stakes per Code of Judicial Art. 1022.
ECLI:BE:CABRL:2021:ARR.20210622.15
Appellate court partially allowed appeal on unjust enrichment claim, increasing damages from 145k to 281k euros.
ECLI:BE:ORGNT:2025:JUG.20250304.1
Court allows objection to debt acceptance due to service delay caused by bailiff's monopoly error creating force majeure.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.237.608
Conseil d'État dismisses appeal due to failure to request hearing within 30 days of auditor's report, presuming withdrawal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fiche

Het begrip in geld waardeerbare vordering is ruimer dan enkel en alleen

een in geld bepaalde vordering of een vordering die (slechts) de betaling

van een specifieke geldsom beoogt. Ook vorderingen die geen concreet bedrag

of een precies becijferde geldsom tot voorwerp hebben, kunnen in aanmerking

worden genomen wanneer de achterliggende waarde van de vordering kan worden

afgeleid uit wat wordt gevraagd.

UTU-thesaurus:

GERECHTELIJK RECHT - RECHTSPLEGING - Uitgaven en kosten (gerechtelijk recht) - Rechtsplegingsvergoeding

Vrije woorden:

in geld waardeerbare vordering