ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11
Généré par l'IA
Employer dismissed employee for unauthorized absence; court upheld dismissal due to lack of prior warning.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Cour du travail de Bruxelles dismissed the employee's appeal against their dismissal for unauthorized absence. The employer argued the employee repeatedly violated attendance rules without prior disciplinary warnings, while the employee claimed the process was unfair. The court ruled that the employer failed to demonstrate the absence was due to misconduct rather than a medical issue, yet found the lack of progressive discipline justified the termination.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 100 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.: An employer may dismiss an employee for unauthorized absence only if the absence is attributable to misconduct and the employer has followed the required disciplinary procedure.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
unauthorized absence
disciplinary procedure
dismissal for misconduct
progressive discipline
labor law
Brussels Court
employee rights
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 100 § 1 k.r.s.
Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.
Texte complet
<>
Document PDF ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11