Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11 Généré par l'IA

Employer dismissed employee for unauthorized absence; court upheld dismissal due to lack of prior warning.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Cour du travail de Bruxelles dismissed the employee's appeal against their dismissal for unauthorized absence. The employer argued the employee repeatedly violated attendance rules without prior disciplinary warnings, while the employee claimed the process was unfair. The court ruled that the employer failed to demonstrate the absence was due to misconduct rather than a medical issue, yet found the lack of progressive discipline justified the termination.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 100 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.: An employer may dismiss an employee for unauthorized absence only if the absence is attributable to misconduct and the employer has followed the required disciplinary procedure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
unauthorized absence disciplinary procedure dismissal for misconduct progressive discipline labor law Brussels Court employee rights

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 100 § 1 k.r.s.
Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

<>

Document PDF ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180911.11