Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180213.9 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180213.9 Généré par l'IA

Statutory notice to employer by trade union interrupts limitation period without requiring power of attorney.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180213.9
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court ruled that a registered notice of default sent by a trade union to an employer within the statutory term successfully interrupts the limitation period for the employee's claim. The employee argued that no power of attorney was attached to the notice, while the opposing party contended this was a fatal defect. The court decided that the law does not require the power of attorney to be included in the initial notice, allowing it to be submitted later in the proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 2244 of the Civil Code; Art. 2 of the Act of 23 May 2013: A registered notice of default sent by a trade union within the statutory period interrupts the limitation period for the employee's claim, provided the power of attorney given to the union may be submitted later in the proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
limitation period interruption trade union notice power of attorney requirement registered letter default employee claim statute maintien du paiement du salaire maintien du contrat forclusion de l'action

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 2244 of the Civil Code
Art. 2 of the Act of 23 May 2013
Généré par l'IA
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.240.350
Court dismisses urgent suspension request against disciplinary committee's extension of preventive suspension due to lack of serious grounds.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180619.9
Employer discriminated against worker by rejecting time credit offer due to union activity under Anti-Discrimination Law.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2019:ARR.245.975
Belgian Council of State dismisses union's request due to failure to file reply within statutory deadline.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2022:ARR.20221110.1
Labor court dismisses claim for interruption of prescription due to lack of clear demand in letter.
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180112.8
Termination due to WAO non-compliance does not invalidate dismissal; signed letter confirms employer's initiative.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fiche

De aangetekende brief van ingebrekestelling met ontvangstbewijs aan de

werkgever verstuurd door de vakorganisatie van de werknemer binnen de

bij art 15 arbeidsovereenkomstenwet bepaalde termijn, stuit de verjaring

van de vordering indien voldaan is aan de voorwaarden gesteld in art 2244

Burgerlijk Wetboek, ingevoegd bij art 2 van de wet van 23-5-2013.

Die bepaling vereist niet dat de door de werknemer aan de vakvereniging

gegeven volmacht bij de aangetekende brief wordt gevoegd. Deze kan later

in de procedure worden voorgelegd.

UTU-thesaurus:

BURGERLIJK RECHT - VERJARING (BURGERLIJK RECHT) - Bezit

SOCIAAL RECHT - ARBEID - Arbeidsovereenkomst

SOCIAAL RECHT - ARBEID - Arbeidsovereenkomst - Einde (arbeidsovereenkomst)

Wettelijke bepalingen:

Wet - 03-07-1978 - 15

oud Burgerlijk Wetboek - 2244