ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20171025.10
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20171025.10
Généré par l'IA
Employer dismissed employee for unauthorized absence; court upheld dismissal due to lack of prior warning.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court of Labour of Brussels upheld the employer's dismissal of an employee for unauthorized absence without prior warning. The employee argued that the employer failed to follow procedural requirements for disciplinary action, while the employer contended the absence was unjustified and severe. The court ruled that the employer's failure to issue a formal warning rendered the dismissal procedurally flawed, leading to the reinstatement of the employee.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACode du travail, art. 100; art. 101: An employer must provide a formal warning before dismissing an employee for repeated misconduct; failure to do so renders the dismissal void.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
unauthorized absence
disciplinary warning
dismissal void
procedural fairness
employee reinstatement
Code du travail
labor dispute
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IACode du travail, art. 100
Code du travail, art. 101
Texte complet
<>
Document PDF ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20171025.10