Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170628.8 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170628.8 Généré par l'IA

Parity commission jurisdiction determined by main activity unless institutional decree specifies otherwise.

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170628.8
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Belgique (BE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court ruled that the parity commission's jurisdiction is generally defined by the company's main activity. The employer argued for a different scope based on specific operational details, while the employee claimed the main activity criterion applied. The court upheld the standard rule, stating that only an explicit institutional decree can override the default determination based on primary business activity.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Loi C.C.T. du 5 décembre 1968; The jurisdiction of a parity commission is determined by the main activity of the concerned enterprise, unless another criterion is fixed by the institutional decree.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
parity commission jurisdiction main activity criterion institutional decree exception social law Belgium labor dispute scope législation industrielle bilan social impôt sur le bénéfice des entreprises

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Loi C.C.T. du 5 décembre 1968
Généré par l'IA
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2018:ARR.20180531.1
Logistics activities for metal trade firms fall under PC 149.04, not PC 111, including after-sales services.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2025:CONC.20250526.3F.3
Court defines business profits as asset value increases minus liability decreases recorded in accounts.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2019:CONC.20191209.3N.7
Employer deemed new only if legal entity differs and technical unit is not identical.
ECLI:BE:CASS:2018:CONC.20180312.3
Court of Cassation confirms labor court has full power to verify economic/technical dismissal reasons but not measure appropriateness.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.242.378
Belgian Council of State corrects a clerical error in a previous ruling regarding procedural costs and opposing party's request. The court fixes the title and adds a missing paragraph about the 700 euro fee. The decision is purely administrative correction. The court corrects a clerical error in a prior ruling by updating the title and adding a missing paragraph regarding the opposing party's request for procedural costs. The court ruled that the previous judgment contained a material error in its structure and omitted a specific finding on the 700 euro fee demanded by the other side. Consequently, the court issued a rectifying decision to ensure the legal record accurately reflects the procedural history and cost allocation. The court's action was limited to fixing the text of the previous judgment without re-examining the merits of the underlying labor dispute. The court corrected a clerical error in a prior judgment by updating the section title and inserting a missing paragraph regarding the opposing party's request for procedural costs. The court ruled that the previous decision contained a material error in its structure and omitted a specific finding on the 700 euro fee demanded by the other side. Consequently, the court issued a rectifying decision to ensure the legal record accurately reflects the procedural history and cost allocation. The court's action was limited to fixing the text of the previous judgment without re-examining the merits of the underlying labor dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fiche Le ressort d'une commission paritaire est, en règle, déterminé par l'activité principale de l'entreprise concernée, sauf si un autre critère est fixé par l'arrêté d'institution. Thésaurus UTU: DROIT SOCIAL - TRAVAIL - Loi C.C.T. - 5 décembre 1968 - Commissions paritaires DROIT SOCIAL - TRAVAIL - Loi C.C.T. - 5 décembre 1968 - Commissions paritaires - Institution et compétence

Annotations Publications: JTT - - 2017-26, 419