ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170620.12
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170620.12
Généré par l'IA
Employer dismissed employee for unauthorized absence; court upheld dismissal due to lack of prior warning.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Cour du travail de Bruxelles upheld the employer's dismissal of an employee for unauthorized absence without prior warning. The employee argued that the employer failed to follow procedural requirements for disciplinary action, while the employer contended the absence was a serious breach of duty. The court ruled that the employer's failure to issue a formal warning rendered the dismissal disproportionate and procedurally flawed.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 100 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.: An employer must provide a formal warning before dismissing an employee for repeated unauthorized absences to ensure the sanction is proportionate and procedurally valid.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
unauthorized absence
disciplinary warning
proportionality of sanction
procedural fairness
dismissal for misconduct
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 100 § 1 k.r.s.
Art. 101 § 1 k.r.s.
Texte complet
<>
Document PDF ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170620.12