ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170608.3 ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170608.3 Généré par l'IA

ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170608.3 · Arbeidshof van Brussel

Numéro de cause ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170608.3

Autorité / Tribunal Arbeidshof van Brussel

Juridiction

Belgique (BE)

Date de la décision 2017-06-08

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ziekte. De omstandigheid dat de sociaal verzekerde niet voldoende initiatieven voldoende grond uit om een einde te stellen aan de erkenning van de arbeidsongeschiktheid.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170608.3 · Arbeidshof van Brussel: ziekte. De omstandigheid dat de sociaal verzekerde niet voldoende initiatieven voldoende grond uit om een einde te stellen aan de erkenning van de arbeidsongeschiktheid.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

constatation de l'incapacité de gain prestations d'invalidité professionnelle inexigible malgré l'atteinte corporelle nouvelle demande de prestations d'invalidité intégration dans l'assurance-chômage pension d'invalidité

Généré par l'IA

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2011:ARR.212.116

Belgian Council of State dismisses urgent request to suspend medical leave decision due to unproven irreparable harm.

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.239.458

Belgian Council of State dismisses appeal as internal reassignment is not actionable without significant functional impact.

ECLI:BE:CTLIE:2021:ARR.20210303.4

Social security appeal dismissed because the lower court's judgment ordering further expertise was a preliminary ruling not yet final. The court held that only final judgments can be appealed immediately. The appeal was declared inadmissible, and the appellant was ordered to pay costs. The court ruled that the lower court's decision to order further expertise was a preliminary ruling (jugement avant dire droit) rather than a final judgment (jugement mixte), meaning it could not be appealed immediately under Article 1050 of the Judicial Code. The appellant argued the lower court should have accepted the expert report, but the court found the lower court was still gathering necessary information. Consequently, the appeal was declared inadmissible, and the appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings. The court emphasized that only final judgments are subject to immediate appeal. The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings. The court ruled that the lower court's decision to order further expertise was a preliminary ruling (jugement avant dire droit) rather than a final judgment (jugement mixte), meaning it could not be appealed immediately under Article 1050 of the Judicial Code. The appellant argued the lower court should have accepted the expert report, but the court found the lower court was still gathering necessary information. Consequently, the appeal was declared inadmissible, and the appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings. The court emphasized that only final judgments are subject to immediate appeal. The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.

ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.242.146

Belgian court dismisses request to suspend and annul decision refusing medical officer extension beyond age 65.

ECLI:BE:CTLIE:2024:ARR.20240514.1

Court partially allowed appeal on permanent disability rate, awarding 24% instead of 30% to employee.