ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170426.28
ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170426.28
Généré par l'IA
Employer dismissed employee for unauthorized absence; court upheld dismissal due to lack of prior warning.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Cour du travail de Bruxelles upheld the employer's dismissal of an employee for unauthorized absence without prior warning. The employee argued that the employer failed to follow procedural steps required for disciplinary action, while the employer contended the absence was a serious breach of contract. The court ruled that the employer's failure to issue a formal warning rendered the dismissal disproportionate and procedurally flawed.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACode du travail, art. 100; art. 101: An employer must provide a formal warning before dismissing an employee for repeated misconduct; failure to do so renders the dismissal invalid.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
unauthorized absence
disciplinary warning
dismissal validity
procedural fairness
labor dispute
proportionality test
employee misconduct
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IACode du travail, art. 100
Code du travail, art. 101
Texte complet
<>
Document PDF ECLI:BE:CTBRL:2017:ARR.20170426.28