Legislator Case Law & Legislation
sl_437.86 MT

MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

12 Articles / Provisions · Malta
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Table of Provisions (12)

Statutory Text (12 Articles)

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 437.86

MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF

BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND

LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

9th September, 2005

LEGAL NOTICE 314 of 2005, as amended by Legal Notice 208 of 2009.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) The title of these rules is Measures for the Eradication

of Brucellosis, Tubercolosis and Leucosis in Cattle Rules.

(2) The scope of these rules is to implement the rules contained

in the European Union Council Directive 77/391/EEC concerning

the introduction of Community measures for the eradication of

brucellosis, tuberculosis and leucosis in cattle.

(3) These rules lay down rules to improve the state of health of

cattle in Malta to accelerate or intensify the eradication of

brucellosis and tuberculosis and to eradicate leucosis.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

Added by

L.N. 208 of 2009.

[Rule 5(1A)]

Enzootic Bovine Leucosis (EBL) Compensation Scheme

A.

Definitions & Abbreviations

Cohorts: Animals known to have coexisted with and have had direct or indirect

contact with infected animals, which may reasonably have led to the spread of

infection to the animals in question.

D Farms: Cow farms licensed as Dairy Producers, which deliver fresh milk to

approved plants producing milk for human consumption.

R Farms: Cow farms licensed as Non-Dairy Ruminant Producers, which rear

ruminants but do not deliver fresh milk to approved plants producing milk for human

consumption.

EBL: Enzootic Bovine Leucosis

EBL +ve: Found positive for Enzootic Bovine Leucosis based on serology of

individual serum samples.

EBL –ve: Found negative for Enzootic Bovine Leucosis based on serology of

individual serum samples.

Approved Farms: Those farms which, on inspection by VRFCC personnel, were

found to be of sufficient standard to remain operational without requiring any

modifications or improvements.

Conditionally Approved Farms: Those farms which, on inspection by VRFCC

personnel, were found to be of sufficient standard to remain operational only if

certain modifications or improvements are carried out. These modifications or

improvements shall be carried out within the period of time specified by the VRFCC

in order for the farm to become ‘Approved’. If these modifications or improvements

are not made by the specified deadline, the farm will lose its ‘Conditionally

Approved’ status and be classified as ‘Unapproved’.

Initial Sampling: The first eligible collection of individual whole blood samples

which was carried out after the 1st of September 2007.

Subsequent Sampling: Collections of individual whole blood samples which were

carried out after ‘Initial Sampling’ but within the period of 1st September 2007 to

1st March 2009.

Initial Testing: The test carried out on samples collected during ‘Initial Sampling’.

VRFCC: The Veterinary Regulation, Fisheries Conservation and Control Division

within the Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs.

B.

Eligibility for Compensation under the EBL Scheme

1. Farmers Eligible for Compensation under the EBL Scheme

In order for a farmer to be eligible for compensation for slaughtered cattle under

this scheme, all the following conditions shall be satisfied

(a) The farmer shall have been licensed by the department responsible for

Veterinary Services as a cattle farm; either as a dairy producer (D) or a

non-dairy ruminant farmer (R), at the time of slaughter;

(b) The farmer shall own a licensed cattle farm which was ‘approved’ or

‘conditionally approved’ by the department responsible for Veterinary

Services in its most recent inspections, at the time of slaughter;

(c) The farmer shall allow free access to VRFCC personnel to his / her farm

holding for blood sampling and disease testing;

(d) The farmer shall follow, to the best of his abilities, all advice given by

the MRRA or VRFCC regarding management of EBL and EBL-infected

cattle;

(e) The farmer shall have a good record of conduct with the VRFCC as far

back as September 2007; having never, in this period, attempted to

disrupt or impede the disease surveillance and control activities of the

VRFCC;

(f)

The farmer shall obey the following rules below regarding the control of

movement of animals

Rules regarding the Control of Movement of Animals

(a) Outward movements from D farms found free of EBL (EBL –ve) will be

allowed.

(b) Inward movement of animals to EBL –ve D farms will not be allowed

unless incoming animals are from EBL –ve farms.

(c) No movement of male animals will be allowed from R farms to D farms

irrespective of disease status.

(d) No movements, inward or outward, will be allowed from any cattle farm

found to harbour EBL (EBL +ve) except in the case of movement of

male animals from EBL +ve D farms to R farms of either status, on the

condition that no female animals are present on the R farm.

2. Status required of Animals for Farmers to be Eligible for Compensation

In order for a farmer to be eligible for compensation under this scheme, all the

following conditions regarding the status of the animal for which compensation is

claimed shall be satisfied

(a) At the time of slaughter the animal shall have been a female or a

breeding male from a farm which was licensed as a D farm, or a female

animal from a farm which was licensed as an R farm.

(b) At the time of slaughter the animal shall have come from a farm which

was ‘approved’ or ‘conditionally approved’ for hygiene standards by the

VRFCC in its most recent inspections.

(c) The animal shall be slaughtered at the national abattoir before the end of

December 2012.

(d) The animal shall be traceable back to birth on the national livestock

database.

(e) The animal shall fit into one of the following categories

Category A Animals

Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on testing of

samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 and delivered to the

abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed by the VRFCC, between 1st October

2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category A1: Animals found EBL +ve based on testing of samples taken between

1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009, which were older than 1 year when

sampled in this period.

Category A2: The proven offspring of the abovementioned animals which were

aged less than 1 year when sampled between September 2007 and 1st March 2009.

Category B Animals

Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on testing of

samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 and delivered to the

abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed by the VRFCC, between 1st October

2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category B1: Non-infected ‘cohort’ animals from farms found to have farm

infection rates above 80% based on testing of samples taken between September

2007 and 1st March 2009.

Category B2: Dubitably infected ‘cohort’ animals less than 1 year of age at the

time of sampling which may have been born of infected cows or may have suckled

colostrum or milk from infected cows.

Category B3: Animals infected after ‘initial sampling’ which are found EBL +ve

in tests performed on samples taken subsequent to ‘initial sampling’ but within the

period of 1st September 2007 to 31st December 2010, limited to 10% of the total

cow population on that farm at the time of ‘initial sampling’.

Category C Animals

Animals classified as eligible for compensation based on testing of samples taken

between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 which are delivered to the abattoir

for slaughter for the farmer’s own reasons and on a date of the farmer’s choosing,

between 1st October 2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category C1: Animals found EBL +ve based on testing of samples taken between

1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009, which were older than 1 year when

sampled in this period.

Category C2: The proven offspring of the abovementioned animals which were

aged less than 1 year when sampled between 1st September 2007 and 1st March

2009. Category C3: Animals infected after ‘initial sampling’ which are found EBL +ve

in tests performed on samples taken subsequent to ‘initial sampling’ but within the

period of 1st September 2007 to 31st December 2010, limited to 10% of the total

cow population on that farm at the time of ‘initial sampling’.

Category D Animals

Animals from farms classified as EBL +ve based on testing of samples taken

between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 which are delivered to the abattoir

for slaughter for the farmer’s own reasons and on a date of the farmer’s choosing,

between 1st October 2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category D1: Non-infected ‘cohort’ animals from farms found to have farm

infection rates above 80% based on testing of samples taken between 1st September

2007 and 1st March 2009.

Category E Animals

Animals classified as dubitably eligible for compensation. Eligibility for

compensation will be decided by the ad hoc EBL Compensation Committee,

hereinafter referred to as ‘the Committee’.

Category E1: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on

testing of samples collected between 1st June 2007 and 1st September 2007.

Category E2: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on

testing of samples collected after 1st March 2009 in the case that ‘initial sampling’

was carried out after this date.

Category E3: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on

testing of samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 and

delivered to the abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed by the VRFCC, before

1st October 2008.

Category E4: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on

testing of samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 and

delivered to the abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed by the VRFCC, after

31st December 2012.

C.

Procedure for Controlling Slaughter and Compensation

1. Blood sampling and testing performed on individual animals over 2 years of

age on farms of unknown disease status and all individual animals over 1 year of age

on farms known to harbour EBL.

2. Meetings held with individual farmers and their Herd Book reviewed to

determine which animals under one year of age should be suspected as EBL-infected

and recommended for slaughter.

3. The farmer shall be informed of changes or improvements which must take

place on his / her farm before compensation will be paid.

4. At least one week prior to the date of slaughter, farmers will be given a list

of animals specified by ear tag number to bring to the abattoir, and a date on which

to bring them. Abattoir officials will also be provided with this same list at least one

week prior to the date of slaughter.

5. On arrival at the abattoir, abattoir officials shall ensure that all the listed

animals have been brought and that no more unlisted animals have been brought than

can be slaughtered that day.

6. Should a greater number of unlisted animals be brought by a farmer than is

possible to slaughter that day, listed animals will be given priority while unlisted

animals may be kept in lairage at the farmer’s expense until the next slaughter day.

7. Farmers shall submit a request for compensation, giving details of animal

identity registration, age and date of slaughter. It will be ascertained from abattoir

records whether listed animals have been duly slaughtered as claimed.

8. The farmer shall be informed in writing regarding compensation to which he

is entitled. This will be in the form of an itemized list showing compensation owed

per animal slaughtered according to categorization under this scheme.

9. The farm shall be inspected to ascertain that the changes or improvements to

the farm holding recommended following the previous VRFCC inspection have been

duly made, ensuring an acceptable level of bio-security.

10. Compensation payments are made.

D.

Calculation of Compensation

Age

Market

Category A

Category B

Category C Category D

Category E

Category

60% MP (X)

X – 20 %

X – 40 %

Zero

Case

(2008)

Dependant

€ 755

€ 0

€ 1258 – 755

> 24

€ 2096.44

€ 1258

€ 1006

month

€ 335

€ 0

€ 559 – 335

12 - 23

€ 931.75

€ 559

€ 447

month

€ 167

€ 0

€ 279 – 167

4 - 12

€ 465.87

€ 279

€ 223

month

€ 84

€ 0

€ 140 - 84

0 - 3

€ 232.94

€ 140

€ 112

month

Costs Related to Slaughter to be Deducted from Compensation

If animals are deemed eligible for compensation under the EBL compensation

scheme, then costs related to the slaughter and de-boning of carcasses will be

subtracted from the amount of compensation due to the owner of the animals.

Slaughter costs will be subtracted for each animal, based on their carcass weight at

slaughter. De-boning costs will be subtracted for each animal over one year of age

when slaughtered. Costs for disease-testing will be taken from slaughter costs for

each animal over thirty months of age when slaughtered. The funds will be

transferred to the accounts of the respective sections which covered the costs

initially.

Procedure

Animal Requiring

Cost

Recipient Account

Procedure

Slaughter

All; Compulsory

€ 0.20 / kg dead

National Abattoir

weight minus € 14

Disease Testing

Animals > 30 month;

€ 14 / head

National Veterinary Laboratory

Compulsory

Deboning

Animals > 12 month;

€ 40 / head

National Abattoir / Malta Beef

Compulsory

E.

Penalties to be Deducted from Compensation for Disruption of MRRA or

VRFCC Activities

Although animals may fall into one of the categories eligible for compensation,

overall compensation will be reduced should the farmer be found guilty of actions

which may disrupt the activities of the VRFCC.

Cases shall be reviewed by the EBL Compensation Committee and judged based

on their own individual circumstances.

Penalties are deducted from the total amount of compensation to be granted to the

farmer. The table below explains the percentage of compensation to be deducted

from the total amount of compensation due to a farmer for each individual

infringement.

Such penalties are cumulative with additional or repetitive infringements by

different owners of the same farm holding.

Infringement

Code

Penalty

Cancellation of sampling appointments

without valid reason(s) following written

15 % reduction in total compensation.

warning.

Unlicensed transfer of an animal.

25 % reduction in total compensation.

Tampering with ear tags.

25 % reduction in total compensation.

Purposeful infection of an animal.

100 % reduction in total compensation.

Template of Table of Calculation of Compensation Owed on a Per Animal Basis

Animal Age Slaughter

Initial Subtrac- Subtrac- Subtrac- Subtrac-

Final

Compen-

ID

Weight

Compen- ted for

ted for

ted for

ted for

Compen-

sation

(Kg)

sation Slaughte Disease Deboning Misdemea- sation

Category

Owed (€)

r (€)

Testing

(€)

nors (%) Owed (€)

(€)

(A – E)

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

For the purpose of these rules, and unless the context

otherwise requires -

"the Commission" means the European Commission of the

Community;

"the Committee" means the Standing Veterinary Committee;

"the Community" means the European Community as established

under the Treaty establishing the European Community;

"the competent authority" means the Veterinary Services within

Malta as provided under article 2 of the Veterinary Services Act;

"the Council" means the Council of Ministers of the Community;

"the Fund" means the European Agricultural Guidance and

Guarantee Fund;

"t he Treaty" m eans t he Treaty establishing the Euro pean

Community;

"Member State" means a State which is a Member within the

European Community;

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) For the purpose of these rules, when in Malta the cattle

population is infected by bovine brucellosis, the competent

authority shall draw up plans for accelerating the eradication of this

disease, under the conditions laid down in sub-rules (2) and (3).

(2) The plans for accelerating the eradication of bovine

brucellosis shall be so devised by the competent authority that on

their completion herds are classed as "officially brucellosis-free",

in accordance with Community law, and in particular European

*These rules have been repealed by Legal Notice 77 of 2025.

Union Council Directive 64/432/EEC on animal health problems

affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine, as

last amended by European Union Council Directive 75/379/EEC

Provided that the plan shall list the measures to be taken to

accelerate and intensify the eradication of bovine brucellosis and

shall specify the measures to combat and prevent this disease.

(3)

The competent authority shall report to the Commission -

(a) the percentage and total number of herds subject to

control measures, and of herds with confirmed bovine

brucellosis;

(b) the total numbers -

(i) of animals subject to control measures;

(ii) of animals with suspected brucellosis

or

considered to be infected;

(iii) of infected animals;

(iv) of animals slaughtered;

(c) the scheduled duration of the initial eradication

programmes and of the accelerated plans;

(d) the method applied for checking on the effective

application of the accelerated plans;

(e) the national budgetary allocation for the eradication of

bovine brucellosis and the breakdown by items of

these allocations

Provided that the information referred to under paragraphs

(a), (b) and (e) shall be provided for the three years preceding the

application of the acceleration measures, and annually thereafter.

(4) When within the jurisdiction of the competent authority, the

bovine population is brucellosis-free, the competent authority shall

inform the Commission of all the measures taken to prevent the

resurgence of this disease.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) For the purpose of these rules, when the cattle

populations are infected with bovine tuberculosis, the competent

authority shall draw up plans for accelerating the eradication of this

disease in their national territories, under the conditions laid down

in sub-rules (2) and (3).

(2) The plans for accelerating the eradication of bovine

tuberculosis shall be so devised by the competent authority that on

their completion herds in particular are classed as "officially

tuberculosis-free", in accor dance with Comm unity law and

European Union Council Directive 64/432/EEC

Provided that the plans shall list the measures to be taken to

accelerate, intensify or carry through the eradication of bovine

tuberculosis and shall specify the measures to combat and prevent

this disease.

(3)

The competent authority shall report to the Commission -

(a) the percentages and total numbers of herds subject to

control measures, and of herds with confirmed bovine

tuberculosis;

(b) the total numbers -

(i) of animals subject to control measures;

(ii) of animals with suspected tuberculosis or

considered to be infected;

(iii) of infected animals;

(iv) of animals slaughtered;

(c) the scheduled duration of the initial eradication

programmes and of the accelerated plans;

(d) the methods applied for checking on the effective

application of the accelerated plans;

(e) the national budgetary allocations for the eradication

of bovine tuberculosis and the breakdown by items of

these allocations

Provided that the information referred to under paragraphs

(a), (b) and (e), shall be provided for the three years preceding the

application of the acceleration measures, and annually thereafter.

(4) When within the jurisdiction of the competent authority, the

bovine population is tuberculosis-free, the competent authority

shall inform the Commission of all the measures taken to prevent

the resurgence of such disease.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) For the purpose of these rules, when the competent

authority has established the presence of enzootic leucosis among

cattle, it shall draw up plans for the eradication of this disease.

(1A) (a) The plans for accelerating the eradication of Enzootic

Bovine Leucosis in Malta shall be those laid down in

the Schedule to these rules.

(b) The Minister shall order the slaughter of cattle

infected with Enzootic Bovine Leucosis and instruct

farmers as to the procedure to be undertaken for such

slaughter.

(c) The Minister shall compensate farmers for infected cattle

slaughtered in terms of the said Schedule.

(2) The plans must specify the measures for combating this

disease.

(3) The tests or methods used to declare a herd free of leucosis

shall be those laid down in European Union Commission Decision

73/30/EEC applying special health guarantees for the prevention of

leucosis in the case of bovine animals imported for breeding or

production, as last amended by European Union Commission

Decision 75/64/EEC, or any other tests or methods recognized by

the procedure laid down in rule 10.

(4) The competent authority shall, on request, furnish the

Commission, with all information regarding the execution of the

plans.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) Expenditure by the competent authority in respect of

measures taken under rules 3,4 and 5 shall be eligible for assistance

from the Guidance Section of the Fund.

(2) Measures taken by the competent authority shall not be

eligible to benefit from financial contributions by the Community

unless a favourable decision according to rule 8 has been given in

respect of the provisions relating thereto.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

Applications for payment shall relate to slaughterings

carried out by the competent authority in the course of a calendar

year and shall be submitted to the Commission before the 1 st July of

the following year.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) The competent authority

shall

forward

to

the

Commission the plans provided for -

(a) in rules 3 and 4 and the information required under

rule 3(3)(c) and (d) and rule 4(3)(c) and (d) prior to

their implementation, not later than three months after

the entry into effect of these rules, and annually

thereafter;

(b) in rule 5 annually, and prior to their implementation in

the case the competent authority has not yet drawn up

plans.

(2)

The Commission shall -

(a) examine the plans forwarded in accordance with sub-

rule (1) for the purpose of determining whether, in

terms of conformity with European Union Directive

77/391/EEC and having regard to the objectives

thereof, the conditions for financial contribution by the

Community are met;

(b) submit a draft Decision to the Standing Veterinary

Committee within two months following the receipt of

any such plans;

(c) issue its opinion in accordance with the procedure laid

down in rule 10, within a time limit set by the

chairman;

(d) consult the Fund Committee on the financial aspects.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) The Commission shall make regular on-the-spot checks

to verify, from a veterinary viewpoint, whether the plans are being

applied.

(2) The competent authority shall take the necessary steps to

facilitate these checks and shall in particular ensure that the experts

are supplied, at their request, with all information and

documentation needed for assessing the execution of the plans.

(3) The provisions for implementing these rules, especially as

regards the frequency and method of carrying out the checks

referred to in sub-rules (1) and (2), the rules governing the

appointment of official veterinarians and the procedure which they

must follow when drawing up their report, shall be laid down

according to the procedure set out in rule 10.

Laws of Malta — Subsidiary Legislation 437.86 — MEASURES FOR THE ERADICATION OF BRUCELLOSIS, TUBERCULOSIS AND LEUCOSIS IN CATTLE RULES *

(1) Where the procedure laid down in this rule is to be

followed, the matter shall be referred by the chairman, either on his

own initiative or at the request of the competent authority, to the

Standing Veterinary Committee.

(2)

The procedure shall be carried out as follows

(a) the representative of the Commission shall submit to

the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken;

(b) the Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft

within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down

according to the urgency of the matter;

(c) the opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid

down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of

decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a

proposal from the Commission;

(d) the votes of the representatives of the Member States

within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner

set out in Article 148(2) of the Treaty;

(e) the Chairman shall not vote.

(3)

Where the measures -

(a) are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee,

the Commission shall adopt them and shall apply them

immediately;

(b) are not in accordance with the opinion of the

Committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the

Commission shall without delay submit a proposal to

the Council on the measures to be adopted.

(4) The Council shall adopt the measures by a qualified

majority

Provided that if the Council has not adopted any measures

within three months of the date on which the proposal was referred

to it, the Commission shall adopt the proposed measures and apply

them immediately, save where the Council has decided against

these measures by a simple majority.

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →