INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS
Table of Provisions (18)
Statutory Text (18 Articles)
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 370.47
INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY
REVIEW INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
REGULATIONS
11th February 2022 *
LEGAL NOTICE 22 of 2022, as amended by Legal Notice 74 of 2023
and 157 of 2025.
(1)
The title of these regulations is the Investment
Services Act (Supervisory Review Investment Firms Directive)
Regulations.
(2)
The scope of these regulations is to transpose Articles 7,
8, 13, 14, 15, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45 and 57 of Directive
(EU) 2019/2034 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
November 2019 on the prudential supervision of investment firms
and amending Directives 2002/87/EC, 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU,
2013/36/EU, 2014/59/EU and 2014/65/EU.
SUPERVISORY POWERS
L.N. 157 of 2025.
(regulations 11, 12 and 13)
(1)
For the purposes of regulations 9, 10, 11(3), and 12 and
the application of the IFR, the competent authority shall have at least
the following powers
(a)
to require investment firms to hold own funds in
excess of the requirements set out in Article 11 of the IFR,
under the conditions of this Schedule transposing the
requirements of Article 40 of the IFD or to adjust the own funds
and liquid assets required in case of material changes in the
business of those investment firms;
(b)
to require the reinforcement of the arrangements,
processes, mechanisms and strategies implemented in
accordance with the Investment Services Rules transposing the
requirements of Articles 24 and 26 of the IFD;
(c)
to require investment firms to present, within one
year, a plan to restore compliance with supervisory
requirements pursuant to the Act, regulations or Investment
Services Rules issued thereunder, the IFD, and to the IFR and
set a deadline for its implementation, including improvements
to that plan regarding scope and deadline;
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(d)
to require investment firms to apply a specific
provisioning policy or treatment of assets in terms of own funds
requirements;
(e)
to restrict or limit the business, operations or
network of investment firms or to request the divestment of
activities that pose excessive risks to the soundness of an
investment firm;
(f)
to require the reduction of the risk inherent in the
activities, products and systems of investment firms;
(g)
to require investment firms to limit variable
remuneration as a percentage of net revenues where it is
inconsistent with the maintenance of a sound capital base;
(h)
to require investment firms to use net profits to
strengthen own funds;
(i)
to restrict or prohibit distributions or interest
payments by an investment firm to shareholders, members or
holders of Additional Tier 1 instruments within the meaning of
the IFR, where the prohibition does not constitute an event of
default of the investment firm;
(j)
to impose additional or more frequent reporting
requirements to those set in the IFD and the IFR, including
reporting on capital and liquidity positions;
(k)
to impose specific liquidity requirements in
accordance with Article 42 of the IFD;
(l)
to require additional disclosures;
(m)
to require investment firms to reduce the risks
posed to the security of investment firms’ network and
information systems to ensure confidentiality, integrity and
availability of their processes, data and assets
Provided that, the competent authority shall notify
the Resolution Committee of any additional own funds
requirement imposed pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) for an
investment firm that falls under the scope of the BRRD.
(2)
For the purposes of paragraph (1)(j), the competent
authority may only impose additional or more frequent reporting
requirements on investment firms where the information to be reported
is not duplicative and one of the following conditions is met
(a)
one of the cases referred to in paragraphs (a) and
(b) of regulation 11(1) applies;
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(b)
the competent authority considers it to be
necessary to gather the evidence referred to in paragraph (b) of
regulation 11(1);
(c)
the additional information is required for the
purpose of the supervisory review and evaluation process
referred to in regulation 9
Provided that, information shall be deemed to be
duplicative where the competent authority already has the same
or substantially the same information, where that information is
capable of being produced by the competent authority or of
being obtained by the same competent authority through other
means than a requirement on the investment firm to report it.
The competent authority shall not require additional
information where the information is available to the competent
authority in a different format or level of granularity than the
additional information to be reported and that different format
or granularity does not prevent it from producing substantially
similar information.
(3)
The additional own funds requirements referred to in
paragraph (1)(a) shall be imposed by the competent authority only
where, on the basis of the reviews carried out in accordance with
regulations 9 and 10, it ascertains any of the following situations for
an investment firm
(a)
the investment firm is exposed to risks or
elements of risks, or poses risks to others that are material and
are not covered or not sufficiently covered by the own funds
requirement, and especially K‐factor requirements, set out in
Parts Three or Four of the IFR;
(b)
the investment firm does not meet the
requirements set out in Articles 24 and 26 of the IFD and other
supervisory measures are unlikely to sufficiently improve the
arrangements, processes, mechanisms and strategies within an
appropriate time-frame;
(c)
the adjustments in relation to the prudent
valuation of the trading book are insufficient to enable the
investment firm to sell or hedge out its positions within a short
period without incurring material losses under normal market
conditions;
(d)
the review carried out in accordance with
regulation 10 shows that non‐compliance with the requirements
for the application of the permitted internal models will likely
lead to inadequate levels of capital;
(e)
the investment firm repeatedly fails to establish or
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
maintain an adequate level of additional own funds as set out in
Article 41 of the IFD.
(4)
For the purposes of paragraph (3)(a), risks or elements of
risks shall be considered not to be covered or to be insufficiently
covered by the own funds requirements set out in Parts Three and Four
of the IFR only where the amounts, types and distribution of capital
considered adequate by the competent authority following the
supervisory review of the assessment carried out by investment firms
in accordance with Article 24(1) of the IFD are higher than the
investment firm’s own funds requirement set out in Parts Three or
Four of the IFR
Provided that, for the purposes of this paragraph, the
capital considered to be adequate may include risks or elements of
risks that are explicitly excluded from the own funds requirement set
out in Parts Three or Four of the IFR.
(5)
The competent authority shall determine the level of the
additional own funds required pursuant to paragraph (1)(a) as the
difference between the capital considered adequate pursuant to
paragraph (4) and the own funds requirement set out in Parts Three or
Four of the IFR.
(6)
The competent authority shall require investment firms
to meet the additional own funds requirement referred to in paragraph
(1)(a) with own funds subject to the following conditions
(a)
at least three quarters of the additional own funds
requirement is met with Tier 1 capital as defined in the IFR;
(b)
at least three quarters of the Tier 1 capital as
defined in the IFR is composed of Common Equity Tier 1
capital as defined in the IFR;
(c)
those own funds are not used to meet any of the
own funds requirements set out in points (a), (b) and (c) of
Article 11(1) of the IFR.
(7)
The competent authority shall substantiate in writing its
decision to impose an additional own funds requirement as referred to
in paragraph (1)(a) by giving a clear account of the full assessment of
the elements referred to in paragraphs (3) to (6). In the case set out in
paragraph (3)(d), that includes a specific statement of why the level of
capital established in accordance with Article 41(1) of the IFD is no
longer considered sufficient.
(8)
Competent authorities may impose an additional own
funds requirement in accordance with paragraphs (3) to (7) on
investment firms that meet the conditions for qualifying as small and
non‐interconnected investment firms set out in Article 12(1) of the IFR
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
on the basis of a case‐by‐case assessment and where the competent
authority deems it to be justified.
(9)
Taking into account the principle of proportionality and
commensurate with the size, systemic importance, nature, scale and
complexity of activities of investment firms that do not meet the
conditions for qualifying as small and non‐interconnected investment
firms set out in Article 12(1) of the IFR, the competent authority may
require such investment firms to have levels of own funds which,
based on Article 24 of the IFD, are sufficiently above the requirements
set out in Part Three of the IFR and in the IFD, including the additional
own funds requirements referred to in paragraph (1)(a), to ensure that
cyclical economic fluctuations do not lead to a breach of those
requirements or threaten the ability of the investment firm to wind
down and cease activities in an orderly manner.
(10) The competent authority shall, where appropriate, review
the level of own funds that has been set by each investment firm that
does not meet the conditions for qualifying as a small and
non‐interconnected investment firm set out in Article 12(1) of the IFR,
in accordance with paragraph (9) and, where relevant, shall
communicate the conclusions of that review to the investment firm
concerned, including any expectation for adjustments to the level of
own funds established in accordance with paragraph (9). Such a
communication shall include the date by which the competent
authority requires the adjustment to be completed
Provided that, the competent authority shall notify the
Resolution Committee of any additional own funds requirement
imposed pursuant to paragraph (1)(a) for an investment firm that falls
under the scope of the BRRD and about any expectation for
adjustments pursuant to this paragraph.
(1)
In these regulations, unless the context otherwise
requires
"the Act" means the Investment Services Act;
"CRD" means Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit
institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions,
amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/
EC and 2006/49/EC, as amended from time to time, and includes any
implementing measures that have been or may be issued thereunder;
"credit institution" means a person licensed in terms of the
Banking Act, whose head office is in Malta or an undertaking whose
business is to receive deposits or other repayable funds from the
public and to grant credits for its own account, authorised by a
European regulatory authority in terms of the CRD or authorised by a
European regulatory authority in an EEA Member State;
"CRR" means Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential
requirements for credit institutions and amending Regulation (EU)
No 648/2012, as amended from time to time, and includes any
implementing measures that have been or may be issued thereunder;
" E B A " m e a ns t h e v B a n ki ng A ut ho ri ty e s t a b li s he d b y
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010;
"EIOPA" means the European Insurance and Occupational
* See Legal Notice 59 of 2022.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
Pensions Authority as established by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010
establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance
and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/
2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC;
"ESCB central banks" shall have the same meaning as that
assigned to it in point 45 of Article 4(1) of the CRR;
"ESFS" means the European System of Financial Supervision;
"ESRB" means the European Systemic Risk Board established
by Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010;
"European investment firm" means a firm as defined in Article
4(22) of the IFR, authorised by its European regulatory authority
within the meaning of Article 5 of the MiFID, or authorised by a
European regulatory authority in an EEA State;
"home member state" means
(a)
in the case of an investment firm, within the
meaning of these regulations, Malta;
(b)
in the case of a "European investment firm", within
the meaning of these regulations, the Member State
where such European investment Firm is authorised
by its European regulatory authority;
"host member state" means a Member State or an EEA State
where an investment firm has established a branch or provides
services on a cross border basis in terms of the European Passport
Rights for Investment Firms Regulations;
"investment firm" means a person who holds an investment
services licence issued by the competent authority under the Act, and
which is subject to the requirements of the IFD;
"the IFR" means Regulation 2019/2033 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on the
prudential requirements of investment firms and amending
Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 575/2013, (EU) No 600/
2014 and (EU) No 806/2014, as amended from time to time, and
includes any implementing measures that have been or may be issued
thereunder;
"the IFD" means Directive 2019/2034 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on the
pru den ti al sup ervi sio n of i nv est me nt f irm s an d am end in g
Directives 2002/87/EC, 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2013/36/EU,
2014/59/EU and w2014/65/EU, as amended from time to time, and
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
includes any implementing measures that have been or may be
issued thereunder;
"Resolution Committee" means the Resolution Committee
appointed in terms of article 7B(2) of the Malta Financial Services
Authority Act;
"third country" means a country which is not a Member State or
an EEA State.
(2)
Words and expressions used in these regulations shall
have the same meaning as that assigned to them as in the Act.
BODIES WITH WHOM THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY MAY
EXCHANGE INFORMATION
(Regulation 6)
The competent authority may exchange information with
(1)
Other European regulatory authorities and may transmit
information to the ESRB, EBA, ESMA, central banks of the Member
States, the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and the
European Central Bank in their capacity as monetary authorities and,
where appropriate, public authorities responsible for overseeing
payment and settlement systems, with confidential information where
that information is necessary for the performance of their tasks, and in
accordance with the IFD and the IFR.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(2)
Bodies or authorities responsible for supervising the
entities governed by and listed in points (1) and (2) of Article 2(1) of
Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial
system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing,
amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament
and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive
2006/70/EC, for compliance with the said Directive (EU) 2015/849.
(1) The Malta Financial Services Authority established
by the Malta Financial Services Authority Act shall be the designated
competent authority in Malta for the purposes of implementing the
relevant provisions of the IFD and the IFR and any reference in these
regulations to the competent authority shall be read and construed
accordingly.
(2)
The competent authority shall exercise all the functions,
obligations and powers pursuant to the IFD and the IFR and shall
satisfy all the requirements imposed on competent authorities by the
IFD and the IFR.
In the exercise of its duties, the competent authority shall
take into account the convergence in respect of supervisory tools and
supervisory practices in the application of the laws, regulations and
administrative requirements adopted pursuant to the IFD and the IFR.
For that purpose, the competent authority
(a)
shall co-operate with trust and full mutual respect,
as party to the ESFS, in particular when ensuring the exchange
of appropriate, reliable and exhaustive information between
them and other parties to the ESFS;
(b)
shall participate in the activities of the EBA and,
as appropriate, in the colleges of supervisors referred to in
Article 48 of the IFD and in Article 116 of the CRD;
(c)
shall make every effort to comply with those
guidelines and recommendations issued by the EBA in
accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
and to respond to the warnings and recommendations issued by
the ESRB pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1092/
2010;
(d)
shall co-operate closely with the ESRB;
(e)
shall not be inhibited by other national legislative
provisions in the performance of its duties as member of the
EBA and the ESRB, or its duties under the IFD and the IFR.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
The competent authority shall, in the exercise of its
general duties, duly consider the potential impact of its decisions on
the stability of the financial system in the other Member States
concerned as well as in the Union as a whole and, in particular, in
emergency situations, based on the information available at the
relevant time.
(1)
The competent authority shall collaborate closely
with European regulatory authorities, as detailed in Schedule II, for the
purpose of its duties pursuant to the IFD and the IFR, and Directive
(EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30
May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the
use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or
terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/
36/EU, in particular by exchanging information about European
investment firms without delay, including
(a)
all information concerning the management and
ownership structure of the investment firm;
(b)
all information concerning compliance with own
funds requirements by the investment firm;
(c)
all information concerning compliance with the
concentration risk requirements and liquidity requirements of
the investment firm;
(d)
all information concerning the administrative and
accounting procedures and internal control mechanisms of the
investment firm;
(e)
any other relevant factors that may influence the
risk posed by the investment firm.
(2)
Where Malta is the home Member State, the competent
authority shall provide the European regulatory authorities of the host
Member State immediately with any information and findings about
any potential problems and risks posed by a European investment firm
to the protection of clients or the stability of the financial system in the
host Member State which it has identified when supervising the
activities of a European investment firm.
(3)
Where Malta is the home Member State of the
investment firm, the competent authority shall act upon information
provided by the European regulatory authorities of the host Member
State by taking all measures necessary to avert or remedy the potential
problems and risks referred to in sub-regulation (2). The competent
authority, if so requested by the European regulatory authorities of the
host Member State, shall explain in detail how it has taken into
account the information and findings.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(4)
(a)
Where Malta is the home Member State of an
investment firm, and following the communication of the information
and findings referred to in sub-regulation (2), the European regulatory
authorities of the host Member State consider that the competent
authority has not taken the necessary measures referred to in sub-
regulation (3), the European regulatory authorities of the host Member
State may, after having informed the competent authority, EBA and
ESMA, take appropriate measures to protect clients to whom services
are provided or to protect the stability of the financial system.
(b)
Where Malta is the host Member State of a
European Investment Firm, and following the communication of the
information and findings equivalent to those referred to in sub-
regulation (2) to the European regulatory authority, and the
competent authority considers that the European regulatory
authority has not taken the necessary measures equivalent to those
referred to in sub-regulation (3), the competent authority may, after
having informed the European regulatory authority, EBA and
ESMA, take appropriate measures to protect clients to whom
services are provided or to protect the stability of the financial
system.
(5)
The competent authority may refer to the EBA situations
where a request for collaboration to a European regulatory authority, in
particular to exchange information, has been rejected or has not been
acted upon within a reasonable time.
(6)
Where the competent authority disagrees with the
measures to be taken by the European regulatory authority of the
host Member State in relation to the information and findings
referred to in sub-regulation (2), the competent authority may refer
the matter to the EBA and request its assistance in accordance with
Article 19 of the IFR.
(7)
Where Malta is the home Member State of the
investment firm, for the purpose of assessing the condition in point (c)
of the first sub-paragraph of Article 23(1) of the IFR, the competent
authority may request the competent authority of a clearing member’s
home Member Stateto provide information relating to the margin
model and parameters used for the calculation of the margin
requirement of the relevant investment firm.
(8)
The competent authority may exchange information with
the bodies listed and in the manner specified in Schedule V for the
better carrying out of its supervisory functions in accordance with the
IFD and the IFR
Provided that the information received or exchanged by
the competent authority or by its officers, employees or agents as well
as inspectors, auditors and experts engaged by the competent
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
authority, from the bodies listed in the said Schedule, shall be treated
as confidential and protected by the duty of professional secrecy.
(1)
Where a European investment firm carries out its
activities through a branch in Malta, the competent authority may
permit the European regulatory authority of the home Member State
concerned, after it has notified the competent authority, to carry out,
itself or through an intermediary appointed for that purpose, on-the-
spot checks of the information referred to in regulation 6(1) and
inspections of such branches.
(2)
The competent authority may carry out, on a case-by-
case basis, on-the-spot checks and inspections of the activities carried
out by branches of European investment firms in Malta and require
information from a branch about its activities for supervisory
purposes, and where it considers it relevant for reasons of stability of
the financial system in Malta. Before carrying out such checks and
inspections, the competent authority shall consult the European
regulatory authority of the home Member State concerned.
(3)
On-the-spot checks and inspections of branches when
carried out in Malta shall be conducted in accordance with the laws of
Malta.
(4)
As soon as possible, following completion of those
checks and inspections, the competent authority shall communicate to
the European regulatory authority of the home Member State, the
information obtained and findings that are relevant for the risk
assessment of the investment firm concerned.
(1)
The competent authority shall collect the
information disclosed publicly by investment firms in relation to
Article 51 of the IFR as well as the information provided by
investment firms on the gender pay gap and shall use it to benchmark
remuneration trends and practices and shall provide this information to
the EBA.
(2)
The competent authority shall collect information on the
number of natural persons per investment firm that are remunerated €1
million or more per financial year, in pay brackets of €1 million,
including data on their work responsibilities, the business area
involved and the main elements of their salary, including bonuses,
long-service awards and pension contributions.
(3)
The competent authority can demand investment firms to
provide it with the total remuneration figures for each member of the
management body or senior management.
(4)
The competent authority shall forward the information
contained in sub-regulations (2) and (3) to the EBA.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(1)
The competent authority shall review, to the
extent relevant and necessary, taking into account the investment
firm’s size, risk profile and business model, the arrangements,
strategies, processes and mechanisms implemented by the investment
firm to comply with the IFD and IFR and evaluate the following as
appropriate and relevant, so as to ensure a sound management and
coverage of its risks
(a)
the risks referred to in Article 29 of the IFD;
(b)
the geographical location of an investment firm’s
exposures;
(c)
the business model of the investment firm;
(d)
the assessment of systemic risk, taking into
account the identification and measurement of systemic risk
under Article 23 of Regulation 1093/2010 or recommendations
of the ESRB;
(e)
the risks posed to the security of investment firms’
network and information systems to ensure confidentiality,
integrity and availability of their processes, data and assets;
(f)
the exposure of investment firms to the interest
rate risk arising from non‐trading book activities;
(g)
governance arrangements of investment firms and
the ability of members of the management body to perform
their duties
Provided that for the purposes of this sub-regulation, the
competent authority shall duly take into account whether the
investment firm holds a professional indemnity insurance.
(2)
The competent authority shall establish the frequency
and intensity of the review and evaluation referred to in sub-regulation
(1) having regard to the size, systemic importance, nature, scale and
complexity of the activities of the investment firm concerned and
taking into account the principle of proportionality. The provisions of
the Investment Services Act (Control of Assets) Regulations must be
taken into consideration.
(3)
The competent authority shall decide on a case‐by‐case
basis whether and in which form the review and evaluation is to be
carried out with regard to investment firms that meet the conditions for
qualifying as small and non‐interconnected investment firms set out in
Article 12(1) of the IFR, only where it deems it to be necessary due to
the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of those
investment firms.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(4)
When conducting the review and evaluation referred to
in paragraph (g) of sub-regulation (1), the competent authority shall
have access to agendas, minutes and supporting documents for
meetings of the management body and its committees, and the results
of the internal or external evaluation of the performance of the
management body.
(1)
The competent authority shall review on a regular
basis, and at least every three years, investment firms’ compliance
with the requirements for the permission to use internal models as
referred to in Article 22 of the IFR. It shall in particular have regard to
changes in an investment firm’s business and to the implementation of
those internal models to new products, and review and assess whether
the investment firm uses well‐developed and up‐to‐date techniques
and practices for those internal models. The competent authority shall
ensure that material deficiencies identified in the coverage of risk by
an investment firm’s internal models are rectified, or take steps to
mitigate their consequences, including by imposing capital add‐ons or
higher multiplication factors.
(2)
Where for an internal market risk model numerous
overshootings as referred to in Article 366 of the CRR indicate that the
model is not or is no longer sufficiently accurate, the competent
authority shall revoke the permission for using the internal model or
impose appropriate measures to ensure that the model is improved
promptly within a set time-frame.
(3)
If an investment firm has received permission from the
competent authority to apply an internal model but no longer meets the
requirements for applying those internal models, the competent
authority shall require the investment firm to either demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the competent authority that the effect of non-
compliance is immaterial or present a plan and a deadline to comply
with the requirements. The competent authority shall require
improvements to that plan if it is unlikely to result in full compliance
or if the deadline is inappropriate. If the investment firm is unlikely to
be able to restore compliance within an appropriate deadline or has not
satisfactorily demonstrated that the effect of non-compliance is
immaterial, the permission to use the approach shall be revoked or
limited to compliant areas or those where compliance can be achieved
within an appropriate deadline.
(4)
The competent authority shall take into account the
analysis carried out by the EBA in terms of Article 37 of the IFD and
the guidelines containing benchmarks on the basis of that analysis
issued by the EBA, for the review of the permissions it grants to
investment firms to use internal models.
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(1) The competent authority shall require an investment
firm to take the necessary measures at an early stage to address
relevant problems in circumstances where
(a)
the investment firm does not meet the
requirements of the Act, regulations or Investment Services
Rules issued thereunder, transposing the requirements of the
IFD or of the IFR;
(b)
the competent authority has evidence that the
investment firm is likely to breach the Act, regulations or
Investment Services Rules issued thereunder, or the provisions
of the IFR, within the following twelve months.
(2)
For the purposes of sub-regulation (1), the powers of the
competent authority shall include those contained in Schedule I.
(3)
The competent authority has the supervisory powers to
intervene in the exercise of its functions into the activity of investment
firms in an effective and proportionate way.
(4)
For the purposes of sub-regulation (1) and regulations 9
and 10(3) of article 29 of the IFD as transposed in the Investment
Services Rules, and of the application of the IFR, the competent
authority shall have the powers as designated in Schedule I below.
(1)
The competent authority shall impose the specific
liquidity requirements referred to in paragraph (1)(k) of Schedule I
only where, on the basis of the reviews carried out in accordance with
regulations 9 and 10, it concludes that an investment firm that does not
meet the conditions for qualifying as a small and non‐interconnected
investment firm set out in Article 12(1) of the IFR or that meets the
conditions set out in Article 12(1) of the IFR but has not been
exempted from liquidity requirement in accordance with Article 43(1)
of the IFR is in one of the following situations
(a)
the investment firm is exposed to liquidity risk or
elements of liquidity risk that are material and are not covered
or not sufficiently covered by the liquidity requirement set out
in Part Five of the IFR;
(b)
the investment firm does not meet the
requirements set out in Articles 24 and 26 of the IFD and other
administrative measures are unlikely to sufficiently improve the
arrangements, processes, mechanisms and strategies within an
appropriate time-frame.
(2)
For the purposes of paragraph (a) of regulation 12(1),
liquidity risk or elements of liquidity risk shall be considered not to
be covered or to be insufficiently covered by the liquidity
requirement set out in Part Five of the IFR only where the amounts
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
and types of liquidity considered adequate by the competent
authority following the supervisory review of the assessment carried
out by investment firms in accordance with Article 24(1) of the IFD
are higher than the investment firm’s liquidity requirement set out in
Part Five of the IFR.
(3)
The competent authority shall determine the level of the
specific liquidity required pursuant to paragraph (1)(k) of Schedule I
as the difference between the liquidity considered adequate pursuant to
sub-regulation (2) and the liquidity requirement set out in Part Five of
the IFR.
(4)
The competent authority shall require investment firms
to meet the specific liquidity requirements referred to in paragraph
(1)(k) of Schedule I with liquid assets as set out in Article 43 of the
IFR.
(5)
The competent authority shall substantiate in writing its
decision to impose a specific liquidity requirement as referred to in
paragraph (1)(k) of Schedule I by giving a clear account of the full
assessment of the elements referred to in sub-regulations (1) to (3).
The competent authority shall inform the EBA of
(a)
its review and evaluation process referred to in
regulation 9;
(b)
the methodology used for decisions referred to in
regulation 12 and Schedule I;
(c)
the level of administrative sanctions laid down by
Member States, referred to in Article 18 of the IFD.
The competent authority, when processing personal data
for the purposes of the IFD, shall do so in accordance with Regulation
(EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the
processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data,
and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection
Regulation).
(1)
The competent authority shall publish the
following information in accordance with the technical standards
adopted by the European Commission
(a)
the texts of laws, regulations, administrative rules
and general guidance adopted in Malta in relation
to the IFD;
(b)
the manner of exercise of the options and
discretions available in the IFR and the IFD;
INVESTMENT FIRMS DIRECTIVE)
(c)
the general criteria and methodologies it uses in the
review and evaluation pursuant to regulation 9;
(d)
without prejudice to the confidentiality provisions
of the Act, aggregate statistical data on key aspects
of the implementation of the IFR and the IFD in
Malta, including the number and nature of
supervisory measures taken and of administrative
penalties imposed in terms of the Act.
(2)
The information published in accordance with sub-
regulation (1) shall be sufficiently comprehensive and accurate to
enable a meaningful comparison of the approaches adopted by the
European regulatory authorities .
(3)
The disclosures shall be published following a common
format and they shall be updated regularly. The disclosures shall be
published on the official website of the competent authority.
Amended by: