Motor Vehicles (Interoperability of Electronic Road Tolls Systems)
Table of Provisions (13)
Statutory Text (13 Articles)
L.N. 398 of 2021
TRAFFIC REGULATION ORDINANCE
(CAP. 65)
AUTHORITY FOR TRANSPORT IN MALTA ACT
(CAP. 499)
Motor Vehicles (Interoperability of Electronic Road Tolls Systems)
(Amendment) Regulations, 2021
IN EXERCISE of the powers conferred by article 54 of the
Traffic Regulation Ordinance and by article 43 of the Authority for
Transport in Malta Act, the Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and
Capital Projects, after consultation with the Authority for Transport in
Malta, made the following regulations:-
(1) The title of these regulations is the Motor Vehicles
(Interoperability of Electronic Road Tolls Systems) (Amendment)
Regulations, 2021 and these regulations shall be read and construed as
one with the Motor Vehicles (Interoperability of Electronic Road Tolls
Systems) Regulations, hereinafter referred to as "the principal
regulations".
(2) The scope of these regulations is to transpose Directive
(EU) 2019/520 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19
March 2019 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and
facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay
road fees in the Union (recast).
Regulation 2 of the principal regulations shall be
substituted by the following new regulation
" Interpretation.
2 .
In these regulations, unless the context
otherwise requires
"Directive" means Directive (EU) 2019/520 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March
2019 on the interoperability of electronic road toll
systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of
information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union
(recast).".
The Schedule to the principal regulations shall be Substitutes the
Schedule to the
substituted by the following new Schedule
principal
regulations.
"SCHEDULE
(Regulation 3)
Directive (EU) 2019/520 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 19 March 2019 on the interoperability of electronic road
toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on
the failure to pay road fees in the Union (recast)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union, and in particular Article 91(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national
parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social
Committee * ,
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions ** ,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure ***
Whereas
(1) Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council **** has been substantially amended. Since further
amendments are to be made, that Directive should be recast in the
interests of clarity.
(2) It is desirable to achieve widespread deployment of
electronic road toll systems in the Member States and in the
neighbouring countries, and to have, as far as possible, reliable, user
**
1 OJ C 81, 2.3.2018, p. 181.
OJ C 176, 23.5.2018, p. 66
*** Position of the European Parliament of 14 February 2019 (not yet published in
the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 4 March 2019.
**** Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29
April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Commu-
nity (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 124).
friendly, and cost-efficient systems suited to the future development of
road-charging policy at Union level and to future technical
developments. Therefore, it is necessary to make electronic road toll
systems interoperable to reduce the cost of, and the burdens linked to,
the payment of tolls across the Union.
(3) Interoperable electronic road toll systems contribute to
achieving the objectives laid down by Union law on road tolls.
(4) The lack of interoperability is a significant problem in
electronic road toll systems where the road fee due is linked to the
distance covered by the vehicle (distance-based tolls) or to the vehicle
passing a specific point (for example, cordon pricing). The provisions
regarding the interoperability of electronic road toll systems should
therefore apply only to those systems and should not apply to systems
where the road fee due is linked to the time spent by the vehicle on the
tolled infrastructure (for example, time-based systems such as
vignettes).
(5) Cross-border enforcement of the obligation to pay road fees
in the Union is a significant problem in all kind of systems, whether
distance-based, cordon-based or time-based, electronic or manual. To
deal with the problem of cross-border enforcement following a failure
to pay a road fee, the provisions regarding the cross-border exchange
of information should therefore apply to all those systems.
(6) In national law, the offence of failing to pay a road fee can
be classified as an administrative offence or as a criminal offence. This
Directive should apply regardless of the classification of the offence.
(7) Due to the lack of consistent classification across the
Union, and their indirect link to the use of the infrastructure, parking
fees should be left outside the scope of this Directive.
(8) The interoperability of electronic road toll systems requires
harmonisation of the technology used and of the interfaces between
interoperability constituents.
(9) The harmonisation of technologies and interfaces should be
supported by the development and maintenance of appropriate open
and public standards, available on a non-discriminatory basis to all
system suppliers.
(10) For the purpose of covering, with their on-board equipment
(OBE), the required communication technologies, European
Electronic Toll Service (EETS) providers should be allowed to make
use of, and link to, other hardware and software systems already
present in the vehicle, such as satellite navigation systems or handheld
devices.
(11) The specific characteristics of electronic road toll systems
which are currently applied to light-duty vehicles should be taken into
account. Since no such electronic road toll systems currently use
satellite positioning or mobile communications, EETS providers
should be allowed, for a limited period of time, to provide users of
light-duty vehicles with OBE suitable for use with 5,8 GHz microwave
technology only. This derogation should be without prejudice to the
right of Member States to implement satellite-based tolling for light-
duty vehicles.
(12) Toll systems based on automatic number plate recognition
(ANPR) technology require more manual checks of toll transactions in
the back office than systems using OBE. Systems using OBE are more
efficient for large electronic toll domains, and systems using ANPR
technology are more suitable for small domains, such as city tolls,
where the use of OBE would generate disproportionate costs or
administrative burdens. ANPR technology can be useful in particular
when combined with other technologies.
(13) In view of technical developments connected with solutions
based on ANPR technology, the standardisation bodies should be
encouraged to define the necessary technical standards.
(14) The specific rights and obligations of EETS providers
should apply to entities which prove that they have fulfilled certain
requirements and have obtained registration as EETS providers in their
Member State of establishment.
(15) The rights and obligations of the main EETS actors, that is
to say, the EETS providers, toll chargers and EETS users, should be
clearly defined to ensure that the market functions in a fair and
efficient manner.
(16) It is particularly important to safeguard certain rights of the
EETS providers, such as the right to the protection of commercially
sensitive data, and to do so without negatively impacting the quality of
the services provided to the toll chargers and EETS users. In particular,
the toll charger should be required not to disclose commercially
sensitive data to any of the EETS provider's competitors. The amount
and type of data which EETS providers communicate to toll chargers,
for the purpose of calculating and applying tolls or of verifying the
calculation of applied toll on the vehicles of EETS users by the EETS
providers, should be kept to a strict minimum.
(17) EETS providers should be required to fully cooperate with
toll chargers in their enforcement efforts, so as to increase the overall
efficiency of electronic road toll systems. Therefore, toll chargers
should be allowed to request from the EETS provider, where a failure
to pay a road fee is suspected, data relating to the vehicle and to the
owner or holder of the vehicle who is the EETS provider's client,
provided that those data are not used for any purpose other than
enforcement.
(18) In order to enable EETS providers to compete, in a non-
discriminatory manner, for all clients in a given EETS domain, it is
important that the possibility is given to them to become accredited to
that domain sufficiently early so that they are able to offer services to
the users as of the first day of operation of the toll system.
(19) Toll chargers should give access to their EETS domain to
EETS providers on a non-discriminatory basis.
(20) To ensure transparency and non-discriminatory access to
EETS domains for all EETS providers, toll chargers should publish all
the necessary information relating to access rights in an EETS domain
statement.
(21) All OBE user rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a
Member State or by a toll charger should be transparent, publicly
announced and available under the same conditions to clients of EETS
providers.
(22) EETS providers should be entitled to fair remuneration,
calculated based on a transparent, non-discriminatory and identical
methodology.
(23) Toll chargers should be allowed to deduct from the
remuneration of EETS providers the appropriate costs incurred to
provide, operate and maintain the EETS-specific elements of the
electronic road toll system.
(24) EETS providers should pay to the toll charger all tolls due
by their clients. EETS providers should, however, not be liable for
tolls that their clients have not paid, when the latter are equipped with
an OBE that has been declared to the toll charger as invalidated.
(25) Where a legal entity that is a toll service provider also plays
other roles in an electronic road toll system, or has other activities not
directly related to electronic toll collection, it should be required to
keep accounting records which make a clear distinction possible
between the costs and revenues related to the provision of toll services
and the costs and revenues related to other activities, and to provide,
upon request, information on those costs and revenues related to the
provision of toll services to the relevant Conciliation Body or judicial
body. Cross subsidies between the activities performed in the role of
toll service provider and other activities should not be allowed.
(26) Users should have the possibility to subscribe to EETS
through any EETS provider, regardless of their nationality, Member
State of residence or Member State of registration of the vehicle.
(27) To avoid double payment and to give users legal certainty,
the payment of a toll to an EETS provider should be considered as
fulfilling the user's obligations towards the relevant toll charger.
(28) The contractual relationships between toll chargers and
EETS providers should ensure, inter alia, that tolls are paid correctly.
(29) A mediation procedure should be established with a view to
settling disputes between toll chargers and EETS providers during
contractual negotiations and in their contractual relationships. National
Conciliation Bodies should be consulted by toll chargers and EETS
providers who are seeking a settlement of a dispute relating to the right
to non-discriminatory access to EETS domains.
(30) Conciliation Bodies should have the power to verify that
the contractual conditions imposed on any EETS provider are non-
discriminatory. In particular, they should have the power to verify that
the remuneration offered by the toll charger to the EETS providers
respects the principles set out in this Directive.
(31) The traffic data of EETS users constitutes input that is
essential for enhancing transport policies of the Member States.
Member States should therefore have the possibility to request such
data from toll service providers, including EETS providers for the
purpose of designing traffic policies and enhancing traffic
management or for other non-commercial use by the State, in
compliance with applicable data protection rules.
(32) A framework is needed that lays down the procedures for
accrediting EETS providers to an EETS domain and that ensures fair
access to the market while safeguarding the adequate level of service.
The EETS domain statement should set out in detail the procedure for
accrediting an EETS provider to the EETS domain, and in particular
the procedure for checking conformity to specifications and suitability
for use of interoperability constituents. The procedure should be the
same for all EETS providers.
(33) To ensure easy access to information by EETS market
actors, Member States should be required to compile and publish all
important data regarding EETS in publicly available national registers.
(34) To allow for technological progress, it is important that toll
chargers have the possibility to test new tolling technologies or
concepts. Such tests should however be limited, and EETS providers
should not be required to take part in them. The Commission should
have the possibility of not authorising such tests if they could
prejudice the correct functioning of the regular electronic road toll
system or of the EETS.
(35) Large differences in technical specifications of electronic
road toll systems might hamper the achievement of EU- wide
interoperability of electronic tolls, and thus contribute to the
persistence of the current situation where users need several pieces of
OBE to pay tolls in the Union. This situation is detrimental to the
efficiency of transport operations, to the cost-efficiency of toll
systems, and to the achievement of transport policy objectives. The
issues underlying this situation should therefore be addressed.
(36) While cross-border interoperability is improving
throughout the Union, the mid- to long-term objective is to make it
possible to travel across the Union with only one piece of OBE.
Therefore, in order to avoid administrative burdens and costs for road
users, it is important that the Commission set up a roadmap to achieve
this objective, and to facilitate the free movement of people and goods
in the Union, without negatively affecting competition on the market.
(37) EETS is a market-based service and therefore EETS
providers should not be obliged to provide their services across the
Union. However, in the interest of users, EETS providers should cover
all EETS domains in any Member State in which they decide to
provide their services. Furthermore, the Commission should assess
whether the flexibility given to EETS providers leads to the exclusion
from EETS of small or peripheral EETS domains, and, if it finds that it
does, take action where necessary.
(38) The EETS domain statement should describe in detail the
framework commercial conditions for EETS providers' operations in
the EETS domain in question. In particular, it should describe the
methodology used for calculating the remuneration of EETS providers.
(39) Where a new electronic road toll system is being launched
or an existing system is being substantially modified, the toll charger
should publish the new or updated EETS domain statements with
sufficient notice to allow EETS providers to be accredited or re-
accredited to the system at the latest one month before the day of its
operational launch. The toll charger should design and follow the
procedure for the accreditation or, respectively, re-accreditation of
EETS providers in such a way that the procedure can be concluded at
the latest one month before the operational launch of the new or
substantially modified system. Toll chargers should respect their part
of the planned procedure as defined in the EETS domain statement.
(40) Toll chargers should not request or require from EETS
providers any specific technical solutions which could jeopardise
interoperability with other EETS domains and with the existing
interoperability constituents of the EETS provider.
(41) The EETS has the potential to considerably reduce the
administrative costs and burdens of international road transport
operators and drivers.
(42) EETS providers should be allowed to issue invoices to
EETS users. However, toll chargers should be allowed to request that
invoices are sent on their behalf and in their name, since invoicing
directly in the name of the EETS provider can, in certain EETS
domains, have adverse administrative and tax implications.
(43) Each Member State with at least two EETS domains should
designate a contact office for EETS providers wishing to provide the
EETS in its territory in order to facilitate their contacts with the toll
chargers.
(44) Electronic tolling and other services, such as cooperative
ITS (C-ITS) applications use similar technologies and neighbouring
frequency bands for short range vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-
infrastructure communication. In the future, the potential for applying
other emerging technologies to electronic tolling merits exploration,
after a thorough assessment of the costs, benefits, technical barriers
and possible solutions thereto. It is important that measures are
implemented to protect existing investments in the 5,8 GHz
microwave technology from the interference of other technologies.
(45) Without prejudice to State aid and competition law,
Member States should be allowed to develop measures to promote
electronic toll collection and billing.
(46) When standards relevant for the EETS are reviewed by the
standardisation bodies, there should be appropriate transition
arrangements to ensure the continuity of the EETS and the
compatibility, with the toll systems, of interoperability constituents
already in use at the moment of the revision of the standards.
(47) The EETS should allow intermodality to develop, whilst
pursuing compliance with the "user pays’ and "polluter pays’
principles.
(48) Problems with identifying non-resident offenders to
electronic road toll systems hamper further deployment of such
systems and the wider application of the "user pays’ and "polluter
pays’ principles on Union roads and therefore there is a need to find a
way to identify such persons and to process their personal data.
(49) For reasons of consistency and efficient use of resources,
the system for exchanging information on those who fail to pay a road
fee, and on their vehicles, should use the same tools as the system that
is used for exchanging information on road-safety-related traffic
offences provided for in Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European
Parliament and of the Council * .
(50) In certain Member States a failure to pay a road fee is
established only once the obligation to pay the road fee has been
notified to the user. Since this Directive does not harmonise national
laws in this regard, Member States should have the possibility to apply
this Directive to identify users and vehicles for the purpose of
notification. However, such extended application should be allowed
only if certain conditions are fulfilled.
(51) Follow-up proceedings initiated after a failure to pay a road
fee are not harmonised across the Union. Often, the identified road
user is given the possibility of paying the road fee due, or a fixed
substitute amount, directly to the entity responsible for levying the
road fee, before any further administrative or criminal proceedings are
initiated by Member State authorities. It is important that such efficient
procedure to put an end to the failure to pay a road fee is available on
similar terms to all road users. For this purpose, Member States should
be allowed to provide the entity responsible for levying the road fee
with the data necessary to identify the vehicle in respect of which there
was a failure to pay a road fee and to identify its owner or holder,
provided that proper protection of personal data is ensured. In this
context, Member States should ensure that compliance with the
payment order issued by the entity concerned puts an end to the failure
to pay a road fee.
(52) In certain Member States, the absence, or dysfunctioning,
of OBE is regarded as a failure to pay a road fee where such fees can
* Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11
March 2015 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-
related traffic offences (OJ L 68, 13.3.2015, p. 9).
only be paid by using OBE.
(53) Member States should provide the Commission with the
information and data necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and
efficiency of the system for exchanging information on those who fail
to pay a road fee. The Commission should assess the data and
information obtained, and propose, if necessary, amendments to this
Directive.
(54) While analysing possible measures to further facilitate the
cross-border enforcement of the obligation to pay road fees in the
Union, the Commission should also assess in its report the need for
mutual assistance between Member States.
(55) The enforcement of the obligation to pay road fees, the
identification of the vehicle and of the owner or holder of the vehicle
for which a failure to pay a road fee was established and the collection
of information on the user for the purpose of ensuring the compliance
of the toll charger with its obligations to tax authorities all entail the
processing of personal data. Such processing needs to be carried out in
accordance with Union rules, as set out, inter alia, in Regulation (EU)
2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council * , Directive
(EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council ** and
Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
*** . The right to protection of personal data is explicitly recognised by
Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
(56) This Directive does not affect the Member States' freedom
to lay down rules governing road infrastructure charging and taxation
matters.
(57) In order to facilitate the cross-border exchange of
information on the vehicles and owners or holders of vehicles for
which there was a failure to pay road fees, the power to adopt acts in
* Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of
personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive
95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
** Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of
personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, inves-
tigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of crimi-
nal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council
Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).
*** Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12
July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of pri-
vacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and elec-
tronic communications) (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union (TFEU) should be delegated to the Commission in
respect of the amendment of Annex I to reflect changes in the Union
law. The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU
should be delegated to the Commission also in respect of laying down
the details for the classification of vehicles for the purposes of
establishing the applicable tariff schemes, further defining the
obligations of the EETS users regarding the provision of data to the
EETS provider and the use and handling of the OBE, laying down the
requirements for interoperability constituents regarding safety and
health, reliability and availability, environment protection, technical
compatibility, security and privacy and operation and management,
laying down the general infrastructure requirements for
interoperability constituents and laying down the minimum criteria of
eligibility for notified bodies. It is of particular importance that the
Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory
work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be
conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the
Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making
* . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of
delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all
documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their
experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert
groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
(58) The implementation of this Directive requires uniform
conditions for the application of technical and administrative
specifications for the deployment, in the Member States, of procedures
that involve EETS actors and the interfaces between them, so as to
facilitate interoperability and ensure that national toll collection
markets are governed by equivalent rules. In order to ensure uniform
conditions for the implementation of this Directive and to define those
technical and administrative specifications, implementing powers
should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be
exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the
European Parliament and of the Council ** .
(59) This Directive should be without prejudice to the
obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limit for the
transposition into national law of the Directive set out in Annex III,
Part B.
* OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
** Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning
mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of
implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
(60) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes
the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
European Union, notably the protection of personal data.
(61) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in
accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the
European Parliament and of the Council * ,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Subject matter and scope
1. This Directive lays down the conditions necessary for the
following purposes
(a) to ensure the interoperability of electronic road toll
systems on the entire Union road network, urban and interurban
motorways, major and minor roads, and various structures, such
as tunnels or bridges, and ferries; and
(b) to facilitate the cross-border exchange of vehicle
registration data regarding the vehicles and the owners or holders
of vehicles for which there was a failure to pay road fees of any
kind in the Union.
In order to respect the principle of subsidiarity, this Directive
shall apply without prejudice to the decisions taken by Member States
to levy road fees on particular types of vehicles, and to determine the
level of those fees and the purpose for which such fees are levied.
2. Articles 3 to 22 do not apply to
(a) road toll systems which are not electronic within the
meaning of point 10 of Article 2; and
(b) small, strictly local road toll systems for which the
costs of compliance with the requirements of Articles 3 to 22
would be disproportionate to the benefits.
* Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18
December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of
personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free move-
ment of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
3. This Directive does not apply to parking fees.
The objective of the interoperability of electronic road toll
systems in the Union shall be achieved by means of the European
Electronic Toll Service (EETS) which shall be complementary to the
national electronic toll services of the Member States.
Where the national law requires a notification to the user of
the obligation to pay before a failure to pay a road fee can be
established, Member States may also apply this Directive to identify
the owner or the holder of the vehicle and the vehicle itself for
notification purposes, only if all the following conditions are fulfilled
(a) there are no other means to identify the owner or
holder of the vehicle; and
(b) the notification to the owner or holder of the vehicle
of the obligation to pay is a compulsory stage of the road fee
payment procedure under national law.
Where a Member State applies paragraph 5, it shall take the
measures necessary to ensure that any follow-up proceedings in
relation to the obligation to pay the road fee are pursued by public
authorities. References to failure to pay a road fee in this Directive
shall include cases covered by paragraph 5 if the Member State where
the failure to pay takes place, applies that paragraph.
Article 2
Definitions
1. For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions
shall apply
(1) "toll service" means the service that enables users to use a
vehicle in one or more EETS domains under a single contract and,
where necessary, with one piece of on-board equipment (OBE), and
which includes
(a) where necessary, providing a customised OBE to
users and maintaining its functionality;
(b) guaranteeing that the toll charger is paid the toll due
by the user;
(c) providing to the user the means by which the payment
is to be made or accepting an existing one;
(d)
collecting the toll from the user;
(e)
managing customer relations with the user; and
(f) implementing and adhering to the security and
privacy policies for the road toll systems;
(2) "toll service provider" means a legal entity providing toll
services on one or more EETS domains for one or more classes of
vehicles;
(3) "toll charger" means a public or private entity which levies
tolls for the circulation of vehicles in an EETS domain;
(4) "designated toll charger" means a public or private entity
which has been appointed as the toll charger in a future EETS domain;
(5) "European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)" means the toll
service provided under a contract on one or more EETS domains by an
EETS provider to an EETS user;
(6) "EETS provider" means an entity which, under a separate
contract, grants access to EETS to an EETS user, transfers the tolls to
the relevant toll charger, and which is registered by its Member State
of establishment;
(7) "EETS user" means a natural or legal person who has a
contract with an EETS provider in order to have access to the EETS;
(8) "EETS domain" means a road, a road network, a structure,
such as a bridge or a tunnel, or a ferry, where tolls are collected using
an electronic road toll system;
(9) "EETS compliant system" means the set of elements of an
electronic road toll system which are specifically needed for the
integration of EETS providers in the system and for the operation of
EETS;
(10) "electronic road toll system" means a toll collection system
in which the obligation, for the user, to pay the toll is exclusively
triggered by and linked to the automatic detection of the presence of
the vehicle in a certain location through remote communication with
OBE in the vehicle or automatic number plate recognition;
(11) "on-board equipment (OBE)", means the complete set of
hardware and software components to be used as part of the toll
service which is installed or carried on board a vehicle in order to
collect, store, process and remotely receive/transmit data, either as a
separate device or embedded in the vehicle;
(12) "main service provider" means a toll service provider with
specific obligations, such as the obligation to sign contracts with all
interested users, or specific rights, such as specific remuneration or a
guaranteed long term contract, different from the rights and
obligations of other service providers;
(13) "interoperability constituent" means any elementary
component, group of components, subassembly or complete assembly
of equipment incorporated or intended to be incorporated into EETS
upon which the interoperability of the service depends directly or
indirectly, including both tangible objects and intangible objects such
as software;
(14) "suitability for use" means the ability of an interoperability
constituent to achieve and maintain a specified performance when in
service, integrated representatively into EETS in relation with a toll
charger's system;
(15) "toll context data" means the information defined by the
responsible toll charger as necessary to establish the toll due for
circulating a vehicle on a particular toll domain and conclude the toll
transaction;
(16) "toll declaration" means a statement to a toll charger that
confirms the presence of a vehicle in an EETS domain in a format
agreed between the toll service provider and the toll charger;
(17) "vehicle classification parameters" means the vehicle
related information in accordance with which tolls are calculated based
on the toll context data;
(18) "back office" means the central electronic system used by
the toll charger, a group of toll chargers who have created an
interoperability hub, or by the EETS provider to collect, process and
send information in the framework of an electronic road toll system;
(19) "substantially modified system" means an existing
electronic road toll system that has undergone or undergoes a change
which requires EETS providers to make modifications to the
interoperability constituents that are in operation, such as
reprogramming or adapting the interfaces of their back office, to such
an extent that re-accreditation is required;
(20) "accreditation" means the process defined and managed by
the toll charger, which an EETS provider must undergo before it is
authorised to provide the EETS in an EETS domain;
(21) "toll" or "road fee" means the fee which must be paid by the
road user for circulating on a given road, a road network, a structure,
such as a bridge or a tunnel, or a ferry;
(22) "failure to pay a road fee" means the offence consisting of
the failure by a road user to pay a road fee in a Member State, defined
by the relevant national provisions of that Member State;
(23) "Member State of registration" means the Member State
where the vehicle which is subject to the payment of the road fee is
registered;
(24) "national contact point" means a designated competent
authority of a Member State for the cross-border exchange of vehicle
registration data;
(25) "automated search" means an online access procedure for
consulting the databases of one, more than one, or all of the Member
States;
(26) "vehicle" means a motor vehicle, or articulated vehicle
combination intended or used for the carriage by road of passengers or
goods;
(27) "holder of the vehicle" means the person in whose name the
vehicle is registered, as defined in the law of the Member State of
registration;
(28) "heavy-duty vehicle" means a vehicle having a maximum
permissible mass exceeding 3.5 tonnes;
(29) "light-duty vehicle" means a vehicle having a maximum
permissible mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes.
Article 3
Technological solutions
1. All new electronic road toll systems which require the
installation or use of OBE shall, for carrying out electronic toll
transactions, use one or more of the following technologies
(a)
satellite positioning;
(b)
mobile communications;
(c)
5.8 GHz microwave technology.
Existing electronic road toll systems which require the
installation or use of OBE and use other technologies shall comply
with the requirements set out in the first subparagraph of this
paragraph if substantial technological improvements are carried out.
2. The Commission shall request the relevant standardisation
bodies, in accordance with the procedure laid down by Directive (EU)
2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council * to swiftly
adopt standards applicable to electronic road toll systems with regard
to the technologies listed in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and
the ANPR technology, and to update them where necessary. The
Commission shall request that the standardisation bodies ensure the
continual compatibility of interoperability constituents.
3. OBE which uses satellite positioning technology and is
placed on the market after 19 October 2021 shall be compatible with
the positioning services provided by the Galileo and the European
Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service ("EGNOS") systems.
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 6, EETS providers shall
make available to EETS users OBE which is suitable for use,
interoperable and capable of communicating with the relevant
electronic road toll systems in service in the Member States using the
technologies listed in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1.
5. The OBE may use its own hardware and software, use
elements of other hardware and software present in the vehicle, or
both. For the purpose of communicating with other hardware systems
present in the vehicle, the OBE may use technologies other than those
listed in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, provided that security,
quality of service and privacy are ensured.
EETS OBE is allowed to facilitate services other than tolling,
provided that the operation of such services does not interfere with the
toll services in any EETS domain.
6. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to
introduce electronic road toll systems for light-duty vehicles based on
satellite positioning or mobile communications, EETS providers may
until 31 December 2027 provide users of light-duty vehicles with OBE
suitable for use with 5,8 GHz microwave technology only, to be used
in EETS domains which do not require satellite positioning or mobile
communications technologies.
* Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9
September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the
field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L
241, 17.9.2015, p. 1).
CHAPTER II
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF EETS
Article 4
Registration of EETS providers
Each Member State shall establish a procedure for registering
EETS providers. It shall grant the registration to entities which are
established on its territory, which request registration and which can
demonstrate that they fulfil the following requirements
(a)
hold EN ISO 9001 certification or equivalent;
(b) have the technical equipment and the EC declaration
or certificate attesting the conformity of the interoperability
constituents to specifications;
(c) have competence in the provision of electronic toll
services or in other relevant domains;
(d)
have appropriate financial standing;
(e) maintain a global risk management plan, which is
audited at least every two years; and
(f)
are of good repute.
Article 5
Rights and obligations of EETS providers
1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers whom they have registered conclude EETS
contracts covering all EETS domains on the territories of at least four
Member States within the 36 months following their registration in
accordance with Article 4. They shall take the measures necessary to
ensure that that those EETS providers conclude contracts covering all
EETS domains in a given Member State within the 24 months
following the conclusion of the first contract in that Member State,
except for those EETS domains in which the responsible toll chargers
do not comply with Article 6(3).
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers whom they have registered maintain at all times
the coverage of all EETS domains once they have concluded contracts
therefor. They shall take the measures necessary to ensure that, where
an EETS provider is not able to maintain coverage of an EETS domain
because the toll charger does not comply with this Directive, it re-
establishes the coverage of the concerned domain as soon as possible.
3. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers whom they have registered publish information
on their EETS domains coverage and any changes thereto, as well as,
within one month of registration, detailed plans regarding any
extension of their service to further EETS domains, with annual
updates.
4. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that, where necessary, EETS providers whom they have registered, or
who provide the EETS on their territory, provide EETS users with
OBE which fulfils the requirements set out in this Directive, as well as
in Directives 2014/53/EU * and 2014/30/EU ** of the European
Parliament and of the Council. They may request from concerned
EETS providers evidence that those requirements are fulfilled.
5. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers who provide the EETS on their territory keep lists
of invalidated OBE related to their EETS contracts with the EETS
users. They shall take the measures necessary to ensure that such lists
are maintained in strict compliance with the Union rules on the
protection of personal data as set out, inter alia, in Regulation (EU)
2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC.
6. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers whom they registered make public their
contracting policy towards EETS users.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers who provide the EETS on their territory provide
toll chargers with the information they need to calculate and apply the
toll on the vehicles of EETS users or provide toll chargers with all
information necessary to allow them to verify the calculation of
applied toll on the vehicles of EETS users by the EETS providers.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers who provide the EETS on their territory
cooperate with toll chargers in their efforts to identify suspected
* Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April
2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the mak-
ing available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/
EC (OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62).
** Directive 2014/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 Feb-
ruary 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to
electromagnetic compatibility (OJ L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 79).
offenders. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that, where a failure to pay a road fee is suspected, the toll charger is
able to obtain, from the EETS provider, the data relating to the vehicle
involved in the suspected failure to pay a road fee and to the owner or
holder of that vehicle who is a client of the EETS provider. Such data
shall be made available instantly by the EETS provider.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that
the toll charger does not disclose such data to any other toll service
provider. They shall take the measures necessary to ensure that, where
the toll charger is integrated with a toll service provider in one entity,
the data are used for the sole purpose of identifying suspected
offenders, or in accordance with Article 27(3).
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that a toll charger responsible for an EETS domain on their territory is
able to obtain, from an EETS provider, data relating to all vehicles
owned or held by clients of the EETS provider, which have, in a given
period of time, driven on the EETS domain for which the toll charger
is responsible, as well as data relating to the owners or holders of these
vehicles, provided that the toll charger needs this data to comply with
its obligations to tax authorities. Member States shall take the
measures necessary to ensure that the EETS provider provides the
requested data no later than two days after receiving the request. They
shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the toll charger does
not disclose such data to any other toll service provider. They shall
take the measures necessary to ensure that, where the toll charger is
integrated with a toll service provider in one entity, the data are used
for the sole purpose of compliance by the toll charger with its
obligations to tax authorities.
The data provided by EETS providers to toll chargers shall
be processed in compliance with Union rules on the protection of
personal data as set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/679, as well as with
the national laws, regulations or administrative provisions transposing
Directives 2002/58/EC and (EU) 2016/680.
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, at the
latest by 19 October 2019, to further define the obligations of the
EETS providers regarding
(a) monitoring the performance of their service level, and
cooperation with toll chargers in verification audits;
(b) cooperation with toll chargers in the performance of
toll chargers' systems' tests;
(c) service and technical support to EETS users and
personalisation of OBE;
(d)
the invoicing of EETS users;
(e) the information which EETS providers must provide
to toll chargers and which is referred to in paragraph 7; and
(f) informing the EETS user of a detected toll non-
declaration situation.
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the
examination procedure referred to in Article 31(2).
Article 6
Rights and obligations of toll chargers
1. Where an EETS domain does not comply with the technical
and procedural EETS interoperability conditions provided for in this
Directive, the Member State on whose territory the EETS domain lies
shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the responsible toll
charger assesses the problem with the stakeholders concerned and, if
within its sphere of responsibilities, takes remedial actions with a view
to ensuring EETS interoperability of the toll system. Where necessary,
the Member State shall update the register referred to in Article 21(1)
in respect of the information referred to in point (a) thereof.
2. Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to
ensure that any toll charger responsible for an EETS domain on the
territory of that Member State develops and maintains an EETS
domain statement setting out the general conditions for EETS
providers for accessing their EETS domains, in accordance with the
implementing acts referred to in paragraph 9.
Where a new electronic road toll system is created on the
territory of a Member State, that Member State shall take the measures
necessary to ensure that the designated toll charger responsible for the
system publishes the EETS domain statement with sufficient notice to
allow for an accreditation of interested EETS providers at the latest
one month before the operational launch of the new system, with due
regard to the length of the process of assessment of conformity to
specifications and of the suitability for use of interoperability
constituents referred to in Article 15(1).
Where an electronic road toll system on the territory of a Member
State is substantially modified, that Member State shall take the
measures necessary to ensure that the toll charger responsible for the
system publishes the updated EETS domain statement with sufficient
notice to allow already accredited EETS providers to adapt their
interoperability constituents to the new requirements and to obtain re-
accreditation at the latest one month before the operational launch of
the modified system, giving due regard to the length of the process of
assessment of the conformity to specifications and of the suitability for
use of interoperability constituents referred to in Article 15(1).
3. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that toll chargers responsible for EETS domains on their territory
accept on a non-discriminatory basis any EETS provider requesting to
provide EETS on the said EETS domains.
Acceptance of an EETS provider in a EETS domain shall be
subject to the provider's compliance with the obligations and general
conditions set out in the EETS domain statement.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that
toll chargers do not require EETS providers to use specific technical
solutions, or processes, that hinder the interoperability of an EETS
provider's interoperability constituents with electronic road toll
systems in other EETS domains.
If a toll charger and an EETS provider cannot reach an
agreement, the matter may be referred to the Conciliation Body
responsible for the relevant toll domain.
4. Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to
ensure that the contracts between the toll charger and the EETS
provider, regarding the provision of EETS on the territory of that
Member State, permit the invoice for the toll to be issued to the EETS
user directly by the EETS provider.
The toll charger may require that the EETS provider invoices the
user in the name and on behalf of the toll charger, and the EETS
provider shall comply with that request.
5. The toll charged by toll chargers to EETS users shall not
exceed the corresponding national or local toll. This is without
prejudice to the right of Member States to introduce rebates or
discounts to promote the use of electronic toll payments. All OBE user
rebates or discounts on tolls offered by a Member State or by a toll
charger shall be transparent, publicly announced and available under
the same conditions to clients of EETS providers.
6. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that toll chargers accept on their EETS domains any operational OBE
from EETS providers with whom they have contractual relationships
which have been certified in accordance with the procedure defined in
the implementing acts referred to in Article 15(7) and which do not
appear on a list of invalidated OBE referred to in Article 5(5).
7. In the event of an EETS dysfunction attributable to the toll
charger, the toll charger shall provide for a degraded mode of service
enabling vehicles with the equipment referred to in paragraph 6 to
circulate safely with a minimum of delay and without being suspected
of a failure to pay a road fee.
8. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that toll chargers collaborate in a non-discriminatory way with EETS
providers or manufacturers or notified bodies with a view to assessing
the suitability for use of interoperability constituents on their EETS
domains.
9. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, at the
latest by 19 October 2019, to lay down the minimum content of the
EETS domain statement, including
(a)
the requirements for EETS providers;
(b) the procedural conditions, including commercial
conditions;
(c)
the procedure of accreditation of EETS providers;
and
(d)
the toll context data.
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the
examination procedure referred to in Article 31(2).
Article 7
Remuneration
1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that EETS providers are entitled to be remunerated by the toll charger.
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that the methodology for defining the remuneration of the EETS
providers is transparent, non-discriminatory and identical for all EETS
providers accredited to a given EETS domain. They shall take the
measures necessary to ensure that the methodology is published as part
of the commercial conditions in the EETS domain statement.
3. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that in EETS domains with a main service provider, the methodology
for calculating the remuneration of EETS providers follows the same
structure as the remuneration of comparable services provided by the
main service provider. The amount of remuneration of EETS providers
may differ from the remuneration of the main service provider
provided that it is justified by
(a) the cost of specific requirements and obligations of
the main service provider and not of the EETS providers; and
(b) the need to deduct, from the remuneration of EETS
providers, the fixed charges imposed by the toll charger based on
the costs, for the toll charger, of providing, operating and
maintaining an EETS compliant system in its toll domain,
including the costs of accreditation, where such costs are not
included in the toll.
Article 8
Tolls
1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that where, for the purpose of establishing the toll tariff applicable to a
given vehicle, there is discrepancy between the vehicle classification
used by the EETS provider and the toll charger, the toll charger's
classification prevails, unless an error can be demonstrated.
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that the toll charger is entitled to require, from an EETS provider,
payment for any substantiated toll declaration and any substantiated
toll non-declaration relating to any EETS user account managed by
that EETS provider.
3. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that, where an EETS provider has sent to a toll charger a list of
invalidated OBE referred to in Article 5(5), the EETS provider shall
not be held liable for any further toll incurred through the use of such
invalidated OBE. The number of entries in the list of invalidated OBE,
the list's format and its updating frequency shall be agreed between toll
chargers and EETS providers.
4. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that, in microwave-based toll systems, toll chargers communicate to
EETS providers substantiated toll declarations for tolls incurred by
their respective EETS users.
5. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance
with Article 30, at the latest by 19 October 2019, to lay down the
details for the classification of vehicles for the purposes of establishing
the applicable tariff schemes, including any procedures necessary for
establishing such schemes. The set of vehicle classification parameters
to be supported by EETS shall not restrict the choice of tariff schemes
by toll chargers. The Commission shall ensure sufficient flexibility to
allow the set of classification parameters to be supported by EETS to
evolve according to foreseeable future needs. Those acts shall be
without prejudice to the definition, in Directive 1999/62/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council * , of the parameters according
to which tolls shall vary.
Article 9
Accounting
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that
legal entities which provide toll services keep accounting records
which make a clear distinction possible between the costs and
revenues related to the provision of toll services and the costs and
revenues related to other activities. The information on the costs and
revenues related to the toll service provision shall be provided, upon
request, to the relevant Conciliation Body or judicial body. Member
States shall also take the measures necessary to ensure that cross
subsidies between the activities performed in the role of toll service
provider and other activities are not allowed.
Article 10
Rights and obligations of EETS users
1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to allow
EETS users to subscribe to EETS through any EETS provider,
regardless of their nationality, Member State of residence or the
Member State in which the vehicle is registered. When entering into a
contract, EETS users shall be duly informed about valid means of
payment and, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, about the
processing of their personal data and the rights stemming from
applicable legislation on the protection of personal data.
2. The payment of a toll by an EETS user to its EETS
provider shall be deemed to fulfil the EETS user's payment obligations
to the relevant toll charger.
If two or more OBE are installed or carried on-board a vehicle, it
is the responsibility of the EETS user to use or activate the relevant
* Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June
1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastruc-
tures (OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 42).
OBE for the specific EETS domain.
3. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance
with Article 30, at the latest by 19 October 2019, to further define the
obligations of the EETS users regarding
(a)
the provision of data to the EETS provider; and
(b)
the use and handling of the OBE.
CHAPTER III
CONCILIATION BODY
Article 11
Establishment and functions
1. Each Member State with at least one EETS domain shall
designate or establish a Conciliation Body in order to facilitate
mediation between toll chargers with an EETS domain located within
its territory and EETS providers that have contracts or are in
contractual negotiations with those toll chargers.
2. The Conciliation Body shall be empowered, in particular,
to verify that the contractual conditions imposed by a toll charger on
EETS providers are non-discriminatory. It shall be empowered to
verify that the EETS providers are remunerated in accordance with the
principles provided for in Article 7.
3. The Member States referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the
measures necessary to ensure that their Conciliation Body is
independent, in its organisation and legal structure, from the
commercial interests of toll chargers and toll service providers.
Article 12
Mediation procedure
1. Each Member State with at least one EETS domain shall
lay down a mediation procedure in order to enable a toll charger or an
EETS provider to request the relevant Conciliation Body to intervene
in any dispute relating to their contractual relations or negotiations.
2. The mediation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall
require that the Conciliation Body states, within a period of one month
following the receipt of a request for it to intervene, whether all
documents necessary for the mediation are in its possession.
3. The mediation procedure referred to in paragraph 1 shall
require that the Conciliation Body issues its opinion on a dispute no
later than six months after receipt of the request for it to intervene.
4. In order to facilitate its tasks, Member States shall give the
Conciliation Body the power to request relevant information from toll
chargers, EETS providers and any third parties active in the provision
of EETS within the Member State concerned.
5. The Member States with at least one EETS domain and the
Commission shall take the measures necessary to ensure the exchange
of information between the Conciliation Bodies concerning their work,
guiding principles and practices.
CHAPTER IV
TECHNICAL PROVISIONS
Article 13
Single continuous service
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that
EETS is provided to EETS users as a single continuous service.
This means that
(a) once the vehicle classification parameters, including
the variable ones, have been stored or declared, or both, no
further in-vehicle human intervention is required during a
journey unless there is a modification to the vehicle's
characteristics; and
(b) human interaction with a particular piece of OBE
stays the same whatever the EETS domain.
Article 14
Additional elements regarding EETS
1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that the interaction of EETS users with toll chargers as part of EETS is
limited, where applicable, to the invoicing process in accordance with
Article 6(4) and to enforcement processes. Interactions between EETS
users and EETS providers, or their OBE, may be specific to each
EETS provider, without compromising EETS interoperability.
2. Member States may require that toll service providers,
including EETS providers, at the request of the Member States
authorities, provide traffic data in respect of their clients, subject to
compliance with the applicable data protection rules. Such data shall
only be used by the Member States for the purpose of traffic policies
and enhancing traffic management and the data shall not be used to
identify the clients.
3. The Commission shall adopt, at the latest by 19 October
2019, implementing acts laying down the specifications of electronic
interfaces between the interoperability constituents of toll chargers,
EETS providers and EETS users, including, where applicable, the
content of the messages exchanged between the actors through those
interfaces. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance
with the examination procedure referred to in Article 31(2).
Article 15
Interoperability constituents
1. Where a new electronic road toll system is created on the
territory of a Member State, that Member State shall take the measures
necessary to ensure that the designated toll charger responsible for the
system establishes and publishes in the EETS domain statement the
detailed planning of the process of assessment of conformity to
specifications and of the suitability for use of interoperability
constituents, which allows for the accreditation of interested EETS
providers at the latest one month before the operational launch of the
new system.
Where an electronic road toll system on the territory of a Member
State is substantially modified, that Member State shall take the
measures necessary to ensure that the toll charger responsible for the
system establishes and publishes in the EETS domain statement, in
addition to the elements referred to in the first subparagraph, the
detailed planning of the re-assessment of conformity to specifications
and of the suitability for use of the interoperability constituents of
EETS providers already accredited to the system before its substantial
modification. The planning shall allow for the re- accreditation of
concerned EETS providers at the latest one month before the
operational launch of the modified system.
The toll charger shall respect that planning.
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that each toll charger responsible for an EETS domain on the territory
of that Member States sets up a test environment in which the EETS
provider or its authorised representatives can check that its OBE is
suitable for use in the toll charger's EETS domain and obtain
certification of the successful completion of the respective tests.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to allow toll chargers
to set up a single test environment for more than one EETS domain,
and to allow one authorised representative to check the suitability for
use of one type of OBE on behalf of more than one EETS provider.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to allow toll
chargers to require EETS providers or their authorised representatives
to cover the cost of the respective tests.
3. Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or hinder the
placing on the market of interoperability constituents for use in EETS
where they bear the CE marking or either a declaration of conformity
to specifications or a declaration of suitability for use, or both. In
particular, Member States shall not require checks which have already
been carried out as part of the procedure for checking conformity to
specifications or suitability for use, or both.
4. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance
with Article 30, at the latest by 19 October 2019, to lay down the
requirements for interoperability constituents regarding safety and
health, reliability and availability, environment protection, technical
compatibility, security and privacy and operation and management.
5. The Commission shall also adopt delegated acts in
accordance with Article 30, at the latest by 19 October 2019, to lay
down the general infrastructure requirements regarding
(a) the accuracy of toll declaration data with a view to
guaranteeing equality of treatment between EETS users in
respect of tolls and charges;
(b) the identification,
through
the
OBE,
of
the
responsible EETS provider;
(c) the use of open standards for the interoperability
constituents of the EETS equipment;
(d)
the integration of the OBE in the vehicle; and
(e) the signalisation, to the driver, of the requirement to
pay a road fee.
6. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, at the
latest by 19 October 2019, to lay down the following specific
infrastructure requirements
(a) requirements on common communication protocols
between toll chargers and EETS providers equipment;
(b) requirements on mechanisms for toll chargers to
detect whether a vehicle circulating on their EETS domain is
equipped with a valid and functioning OBE;
(c)
requirements on the human-machine interface in the
OBE;
(d) requirements applying specifically to interoperability
constituents in microwave technologies-based toll systems; and
(e) requirements applying specifically in Global
Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based toll systems.
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the
examination procedure referred to in Article 31(2).
7. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, at the
latest by 19 October 2019, to lay down the procedure to be applied by
the Member States for assessing the conformity to specifications and
suitability for use of interoperability constituents, including the
content and format of the EC declarations. Those implementing acts
shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure
referred to in Article 31(2).
CHAPTER V
SAFEGUARD CLAUSES
Article 16
Safeguard procedure
1. Where a Member State has reason to believe that
interoperability constituents bearing a CE marking and placed on the
market are unlikely, when used as intended, to meet the relevant
requirements, it shall take all necessary steps to restrict their field of
application, prohibit their use or withdraw them from the market. The
Member State shall immediately inform the Commission of the
measures taken and give the reasons for its decision, stating in
particular whether failure to conform is due to
(a)
incorrect application of technical specifications; or
(b)
inadequacy of technical specifications.
2. The Commission shall consult the concerned Member
State, manufacturer, EETS provider or their authorised representatives
established within the Union as quickly as possible. Where, following
that consultation, the Commission establishes that the measure is
justified, it shall immediately inform the Member State concerned as
well as the other Member States. However, where, following that
consultation, the Commission establishes that the measure is
unjustified, it shall immediately inform the Member State concerned,
as well as the manufacturer or its authorised representative established
within the Union and the other Member States.
3. Where interoperability constituents bearing the CE marking
fail to comply with interoperability requirements, the competent
Member State shall require the manufacturer or its authorised
representative established in the Union to restore the interoperability
constituent to a state of conformity to specifications or suitability for
use, or both, under the conditions laid down by that Member State and
shall inform the Commission and the other Member States thereof.
Article 17
Transparency of assessments
Any decision taken by a Member State or a toll charger concerning
the assessment of conformity to specifications or suitability for use
of interoperability constituents and any decision taken pursuant to
Article 16 shall set out in detail the reasons on which it is based. It
shall be notified as soon as possible to the concerned manufacturer,
EETS provider or their authorised representatives, together with an
indication of the remedies available under the laws in force in the
Member State concerned and of the time limits allowed for the
exercise of such remedies.
CHAPTER VI
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
Article 18
Single contact office
Each Member State with at least two EETS domains on its territory
shall designate a single contact office for EETS providers. The
Member State shall make public the contact details of that office,
and provide them, upon request, to interested EETS providers. The
Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that,
upon request of the EETS provider, the contact office facilitates and
coordinates early administrative contacts between the EETS
provider and the toll chargers responsible for the EETS domains on
the territory of the Member State. The contact office may be a
natural person or a public or a private body.
Article 19
Notified bodies
1. Member States shall notify to the Commission and the
other Member States any bodies entitled to carry out or supervise the
procedure for the assessment of conformity to specifications or
suitability for use referred to in the implementing acts referred to in
Article 15(7), indicating each body's area of competence, and the
identification numbers obtained in advance from the Commission. The
Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European
Union the list of bodies, their identification numbers and areas of
competence, and shall keep the list updated.
2. Member States shall apply the criteria provided for in the
delegated acts referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article for the
assessment of the bodies to be notified. Bodies meeting the assessment
criteria provided for in the relevant European standards shall be
deemed to meet the said criteria.
3. A Member State shall withdraw approval from a body
which no longer meets the criteria provided for in the delegated acts
referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article. It shall immediately inform
the Commission and the other Member States thereof.
4. Where a Member State or the Commission considers that a
body notified by another Member State does not meet the criteria
provided for in the delegated acts referred to in paragraph 5 of this
Article, the matter shall be referred to the Electronic Toll Committee
referred to in Article 31(1), which shall deliver its opinion within three
months. In the light of the opinion of that Committee, the Commission
shall inform the Member State which notified the body in question of
any changes that are necessary for the notified body to retain the status
conferred upon it.
5. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance
with Article 30, at the latest by 19 October 2019, to lay down the
minimum criteria of eligibility for notified bodies.
Article 20
Coordination Group
A Coordination Group of the bodies notified under Article 19(1)
(the "Coordination Group") shall be set up as a working group of
the Electronic Toll Committee referred to in Article 31(1), in
accordance with that Committee's Rules of Procedure.
Article 21
Registers
1. For the purposes of the implementation of this Directive,
each Member State shall keep a national electronic register of the
following
(a) the EETS domains within their territory, including
information relating to
(i)
the corresponding toll chargers;
(ii)
the tolling technologies employed;
(iii) the toll context data;
(iv) the EETS domain statement; and
(v) the EETS providers having EETS contracts
with the toll chargers active in the territory of that Member
State;
(b) the EETS providers to whom it has granted
registration in accordance with Article 4; and
(c) the details of the single contact office referred to in
Article 18 for EETS including a contact email address and
telephone number.
Unless otherwise specified, Member States shall verify at least
once a year that the requirements set out in points (a), (d), (e) and (f) of
Article 4 are still met, and shall update the register accordingly. The
register shall also contain the conclusions of the audit provided for in
point (e) of Article 4. A Member State shall not be held liable for the
actions of the EETS providers mentioned in its register.
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that all the data contained in the national electronic register are kept
up-to-date and are accurate.
3. The registers shall be electronically accessible to the
public.
4. These registers shall be available as of 19 October 2021.
5. At the end of each calendar year, the Member States
authorities in charge of the registers shall communicate, to the
Commission, by electronic means, the registers of EETS domains and
EETS providers. The Commission shall make the information
available to the other Member States. Any inconsistencies with the
situation in a Member State shall be brought to the attention of the
Member State of registration and of the Commission.
CHAPTER VII
PILOT SYSTEMS
Article 22
Pilot toll systems
1. To allow for EETS technical development, Member States
may temporarily authorise, on limited parts of their toll domain and in
parallel with the EETS compliant system, pilot toll systems
incorporating new technologies or concepts which do not comply with
one or more provisions of this Directive.
2. EETS providers shall not be required to participate in pilot
toll systems.
3. Before starting a pilot toll system, the Member State
concerned shall request the authorisation of the Commission. The
Commission shall issue the authorisation or refuse it, in the form of a
Decision, within six months from the moment it received the request.
The Commission may refuse the authorisation if the pilot toll system
could prejudice the correct functioning of the regular electronic road
toll system or of the EETS. The initial period of such authorisation
shall not exceed three years.
CHAPTER VIII
EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ON THE FAILURE TO PAY
ROAD FEES
Article 23
Procedure for the exchange of information between Member
States
1. In order to allow the identification of the vehicle, and the
owner or holder of that vehicle, for which a failure to pay a road fee
has been established, each Member State shall grant access only to
other Member States' national contact points to the following national
vehicle registration data, with the power to conduct automated
searches thereon
(a)
data relating to vehicles; and
(b)
data relating to the owners or holders of the vehicle.
The data elements referred to in points (a) and (b) which are
necessary in order to conduct an automated search shall comply with
Annex I
2. For the purposes of the exchange of data referred to in
paragraph 1, each Member State shall designate a national contact
point. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that
the exchange of information between Member States takes place only
between the national contact points. The powers of the national contact
points shall be governed by the applicable law of the Member State
concerned. In that data exchange process, particular attention shall be
paid to the proper protection of personal data.
3. When conducting an automated search in the form of an
outgoing request, the national contact point of the Member State in
whose territory there was a failure to pay a road fee shall use a full
registration number.
Those automated searches shall be conducted in compliance with
the procedures referred to in points 2 and 3 of Chapter 3 of the Annex
to Council Decision 2008/616/JHA * and with the requirements of
Annex I to this Directive.
The Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a
road fee shall use the data obtained in order to establish who is liable
for the failure to pay that fee.
4. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that the exchange of information is carried out using the European
Vehicle and Driving Licence Information System (Eucaris) software
application and amended versions of this software, in compliance with
Annex I to this Directive and with points 2 and 3 of Chapter 3 of the
Annex to Decision 2008/616/JHA.
5. Each Member State shall bear its own costs arising from the
administration, use and maintenance of the software applications
referred to in paragraph 4.
Article 24
Information letter on the failure to pay a road fee
1. The Member State in whose territory there was a failure to
pay a road fee shall decide whether or not to initiate follow-up
proceedings in relation to the failure to pay a road fee.
Where the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to
pay a road fee decides to initiate such proceedings, that Member State
shall, in accordance with its national law, inform the owner, the holder
of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of failing to
* Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Deci-
sion 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross- border cooperation, particularly
in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 12).
pay the road fee.
This information shall, as applicable under national law, include
the legal consequences thereof within the territory of the Member State
in which there was a failure to pay a road fee under the law of that
Member State.
2. When sending the information letter to the owner, the
holder of the vehicle or to the otherwise identified person suspected of
failing to pay the road fee, the Member State in whose territory there
was a failure to pay a road fee shall, in accordance with its national
law, include any relevant information, notably the nature of the failure
to pay the road fee, the place, date and time of the failure to pay the
road fee, the title of the texts of the national law infringed, the right to
appeal and to have access to information, and the sanction and, where
appropriate, data concerning the device used for detecting the failure
to pay a road fee. For that purpose, the Member State in whose
territory there was a failure to pay a road fee shall base the information
letter on the template set out in Annex II.
3. Where the Member State in whose territory there was a
failure to pay a road fee decides to initiate follow-up proceedings in
relation to the failure to pay a road fee, it shall, for the purpose of
ensuring the respect of fundamental rights, send the information letter
in the language of the registration document of the vehicle, if
available, or in one of the official languages of the Member State of
registration.
Article 25
Follow-up proceedings by the levying entities
1. The Member State on whose territory there was a failure to
pay a road fee may provide to the entity responsible for levying the
road fee the data obtained through the procedure referred to in Article
23(1) only if the following conditions are met
(a) the data transferred is limited to what is needed by
that entity to obtain the road fee due;
(b) the procedure for obtaining the road fee due complies
with the procedure provided for in Article 24;
(c) the entity concerned is responsible for carrying out
this procedure; and
(d) compliance with the payment order issued by the
entity receiving the data puts an end to the failure to pay a road
fee.
2. Member States shall ensure that the data provided to the
responsible entity are used solely for the purpose of obtaining the road
fee due and is immediately deleted once the road fee is paid or, if the
failure to pay persists, within a reasonable period after the transfer of
the data, to be set by the Member State.
Article 26
Reporting by Member States to the Commission
Each Member State shall send a comprehensive report to the
Commission by 19 April 2023 and every three years thereafter.
The comprehensive report shall indicate the number of automated
searches conducted by the Member State in whose territory there
was a failure to pay a road fee addressed to the national contact
point of the Member State of registration, following failures to pay
road fees that occurred on its territory, together with the number of
failed requests.
The comprehensive report shall also include a description of the
situation at national level in relation to the follow-up concerning the
failures to pay road fees, based on the proportion of such failures to
pay road fees which have been followed up by information letters.
Article 27
Data protection
1. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and the national laws,
regulations or administrative provisions transposing Directives 2002/
58/EC and (EU) 2016/680 shall apply to personal data processed under
this Directive.
2. Member States shall, in accordance with applicable data
protection legislation, take the measures necessary, to ensure that
(a) the processing of personal data for the purposes of
Articles 23, 24 and 25 is limited to the types of data listed in
Annex I to this Directive;
(b) personal data are accurate, kept up-to date and
requests for rectification or erasure are handled without undue
delay; and
(c) a time limit is established for the storage of personal
data. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure
that personal data processed under this Directive are used only
for the purposes of
(a) identification of suspected offenders in view of
the obligation to pay road fees within the scope of Article
5(8);
(b) ensuring the compliance of the toll charger as
regards its obligations to tax authorities within the scope of
Article 5(9); and
(c) identification of the vehicle and the owner or
holder of the vehicle for which a failure to pay a road fee
has been established within the scope of Articles 23 and 24.
Member States shall also take the measures necessary to ensure
that the data subjects have the same rights of information, access,
rectification, erasure and restriction of processing, and to lodge a
complaint with a data protection supervisory authority, compensation
and an effective judicial remedy as provided for in Regulation (EU)
2016/679 or, where applicable, Directive (EU) 2016/680.
3. This Article shall not affect the possibility of Member
States to restrict the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in
certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 in accordance with
Article 23 of that Regulation for the purposes listed in the first
paragraph of that Article.
4. Any person concerned shall have the right to obtain,
without undue delay, information on which personal data recorded in
the Member State of registration were transmitted to the Member State
in which there was a failure to pay a road fee, including the date of the
request and the competent authority of the Member State in whose
territory there was a failure to pay a road fee.
CHAPTER IX
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 28
Report
1. By 19 April 2023, the Commission shall present a report to
the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation and
effects of this Directive, in particular as regards the advancement and
deployment of the EETS and the effectiveness and efficiency of the
mechanism for the exchange of data in the framework of the
investigation of events of failure to pay road fees.
The report shall analyse in particular the following
(a) the effect of Article 5(1) and (2) on the deployment of
EETS, with a particular focus on the availability of the service in
small or peripheral EETS domains;
(b) the effectiveness of Articles 23, 24 and 25 on the
reduction in the number of failures to pay road fees in the Union;
(c) the progress made on interoperability aspects
between electronic road toll systems using satellite positioning
and 5,8 GHz microwave technology.
2. The report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a
proposal to the European Parliament and the Council for further
revision of this Directive, regarding notably the following elements
(a) additional measures to ensure that the EETS is
available in all EETS domains, including small and peripheral
ones;
(b) measures to further facilitate the cross-border
enforcement of the obligation to pay road fees in the Union,
including mutual assistance arrangements; and
(c) the extension of the provisions facilitating cross-
border enforcement to low emission zones, restricted access
zones or other urban vehicle access regulation schemes.
Article 29
Delegated acts
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in
accordance with Article 30, updating Annex I to take into account
any relevant amendments to be made to Council Decisions 2008/
615/JHA * and 2008/616/JHA or where this is required by any other
relevant legal acts of the Union.
Article 30
Exercise of the delegation
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the
Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article
* Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-bor-
der cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (OJ
L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1).
8(5), Article 10(3), Article 15(4) and (5), Article 19(5) and Article 29
shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from
18 April 2019. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of
the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of
the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended
for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or
the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before
the end of each period.
3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 8(5), Article
10(3), Article 15(4) and (5), Article 19(5) and Article 29 may be
revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A
decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power
specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the
publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European
Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity
of any delegated acts already in force.
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall
consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with
the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April
2016 on Better Law-Making.
5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall
notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the
Council.
6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 8(5), Article
10(3), Article 15(4) and (5), Article 19(5) and Article 29 shall enter
into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the
European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months
of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council
or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the
Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the
European Parliament or of the Council.
Article 31
Committee procedure
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Electronic Toll
Committee.
That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
2. When reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Where the committee
delivers no opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft
implementing act and the third sub-paragraph of Article 5(4) of
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Article 32
Transposition
1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by 19 October
2021, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply with Articles 1 to 27 and Annexes I and II. They shall
immediately communicate the text of those measures to the
Commission.
They shall apply those measures from 19 October 2021.
When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a
reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference
on the occasion of their official publication. They shall also include a
statement that references in existing laws, regulations and
administrative provisions to the Directive repealed by this Directive
shall be construed as references to this Directive. Member States shall
determine how such reference is to be made and how that statement is
to be formulated.
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the
text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the
field covered by this Directive.
Article 33
Repeal
Directive 2004/52/EC is repealed with effect from 20 October 2021,
without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating
to the time-limit for the transposition into national law of the
Directive set out in Annex III, Part B.
References to the repealed Directive shall be construed as
references to this Directive and shall be read in accordance with the
correlation table set out in Annex IV.
Article 34
Entry into force
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following
that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 35
Addressees
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 March 2019.
For
the
European
The President
Parliament For the Council
The President
A. TAJANI
G. CIAMBA
ANNEX I
Data elements necessary to conduct the automated search referred
to in Article 23(1)
Data elements provided as a result of the automated search
conducted pursuant to Article 23(1)
Part I. Data relating to vehicles
Part II. Data relating to owners or holders of the vehicles
ANNEX II
TEMPLATE FOR THE INFORMATION LETTER
referred to in Article 24
[Cover page]
[Name, address and telephone number of sender].........................
.... [Name and address of addressee]
INFORMATION LETTER
regarding the failure to pay a road fee occurred in .,................
………………………………………………
[name of the Member State in whose territory there was a failure
to pay a road fee]
Page 2
On
a
failure to pay a road fee with the vehicle with registration
……………………………
[date]
number .......................... make ..............................
model
........................ was detected by .......................................
[name of the responsible body]
[Option 1] (1)
You are registered as the holder of the registration certificate of
the abovementioned vehicle.
[Option 2] (1)
The holder of the registration certificate of the abovementioned
vehicle indicated that you were driving that vehicle when the failure to
pay a road fee was committed. The relevant details of the failure to pay
a road fee are described on page 3 below.
The amount of the financial penalty due for the failure to pay a
road fee is .............................. EUR/national currency (1) . The amount
of the road fee due to pay is .............................................. EUR/
national currency (1) .
Deadline for the payment is ..................................................
You are advised to complete the attached reply form (page 4) and
send it to the address shown, if you do not pay this financial penalty
(1) /road fee (1) .
This letter shall be processed in accordance with the national law
of ...........................................................................................[name of
the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road
fee].
Page 3
Relevant details concerning the failure to pay a road fee
(a) Data concerning the vehicle which was used in the failure to
pay a
road fee: Registration number: .........................................
Member State of registration: ……......................................................
Make and model ...............................................................................
(b) Data concerning the failure to pay a road fee
Place, date and time where the failure to pay a road fee occurred
Nature and legal classification of the failure to pay a road fee
Detailed description of the failure to pay a road fee
Reference
to
the
relevant
legal
provision(s)
Description of or reference to the evidence regarding the failure to pay
a road fee: ...........................................................................................
(c) Data concerning the device that was used for detecting the
failure to pay a road fee (2)
Specification of the device: ..........................................
Identification number of the device: ..................................
Expiry date for the last gauging: ...................................
(1) Delete if not applicable.
(2) Not applicable if no device has been used.
Page 4
Reply form
(please complete using block capitals)
Identity of the driver: — Full name: ……............................ —
Place and date of birth...................................................................... —
Number of driving licence: ..............................................................
delivered (date): …………………and at (place): ...................
— Address: ….......................................................................
B. List of questions
1. Is the vehicle, make ................., registration number
......................, registered in your name? ................ yes/no (1) If not,
holder
of
the
registration
certificate
is
...................................................................... (name, first name,
address)
2. Do you acknowledge that you failed to pay a road fee? yes/no
(1)
3. If you do not acknowledge this, please explain why
Please send the completed form within 60 days from the date of this
information letter to the following authority or entity
at the following address………………………………………………
INFORMATION
(Where the information letter is sent by the entity responsible for
levying the road fee pursuant to Article 25)
If the road fee due is not paid within the deadline set out in this
information letter, this case will be forwarded to and examined by the
competent authority of ……..................................................................
[name of the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to
pay a road fee].
If this case is not pursued, you will be informed within 60 days
after receipt of the reply form or the proof of payment (1) .
/
(Where the information letter is sent by the competent authority
of the Member State): This case will be examined by the competent
authority of ................................................................................ [name
of the Member State in whose territory there was a failure to pay a road
fee]. If this case is not pursued, you will be informed within 60 days
after receipt of the reply form or the proof of payment (1) .
(1) Delete if not applicable.
If this case is pursued, the following procedure applies
[to be filled in by the Member State in whose territory there was a
failure to pay a road fee – what the further procedure will be, Including
details of the possibility and procedure of appeal against the decision
to pursue the case. These details shall in any event include: name and
address of the authority or entity in charge of pursuing the case;
deadline for payment; name and address of the body of appeal
concerned; deadline for appeal].
This letter as such does not lead to legal consequences.
Data protection disclaimer
[Where Regulation (EU) 2016/679 is applicable
In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, you have the right to
request access to, and rectification or erasure of, personal data or
restriction of processing of your personal data or to object to the
processing, as well as the right to data portability. You also have the
right to lodge a complaint with [name and address of the relevant
supervisory authority].
[Where Directive (EU) 2016/680 is applicable
In accordance with [name of the national law applying Directive (EU)
2016/680], you have the right to request from the controller access to
and rectification or erasure of personal data and restriction of
processing of your personal data. You also have the right to lodge a
complaint with [name and address of the relevant supervisory
authority].]
ANNEX III
PART A
Repealed Directive with the amendment thereto
(referred to in Article 33)
PART B
Time-limit for transposition into national law
(referred to in Article 33)
ANNEX IV
Correlation
Table
€4.77
3.2014, p. 79).
jiżguraw li fornituri tal-EETS li jipprovdu l-EETS fit-territorju
tagħhom jikkooperaw mal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ fl-isforzi tagħhom
biex jidentifikaw awturi suspettati ta' reati. L-Istati Membri għandhom
jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li, fejn ikun suspettat nuqqas
ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat- triq, il-kollettur tal-pedaġġ ikun jista' jikseb mill-
fornitur tal-EETS id-data marbuta mal-vettura involuta fin-nuqqas
suspettat ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq u lis-sid jew lid-detentur ta' dik il-
vettura li hu klijent tal-fornitur tal-EETS. Din id-data għandha
tingħata minnufih mill-fornitur tal-EETS.
L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-kollettur tal-pedaġġ ma jiżvelax din id-data lil ebda
fornitur ieħor tas-servizz ta' pedaġġ. Huma għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri
meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li, fejn il-kollettur tal- pedaġġ ikun integrat
ma' fornitur tas-servizz ta' pedaġġ f'entità waħda, id-data tintuża biss
biex tidentifika awturi suspettati ta' reati, jew skont l-Artikolu 27(3).
9. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li kollettur tal-pedaġġ responsabbli minn dominju tal-EETS
fit-territorju tagħhom ikun jista' jikseb minn fornitur tal-EETS data
marbuta mal-vetturi kollha li s-sid jew id-detenturi tagħhom ikunu
klijenti tal-fornitur tal-EETS, li, f'perijodu partikolari ta' żmien, ikunu
saqu fid-dominju tal-EETS li għalih ikun responsabbli l-kollettur tal-
pedaġġ, kif ukoll id-data marbuta mas-sidien jew id-detenturi ta' dawn
il-vetturi, dment li l-kollettur tad-data jkun jeħtieġ din id-data biex
jikkonforma mal-obbligi tiegħu lejn l-awtoritajiet tat- taxxa. L-Istati
Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li l-fornitur
tal-EETS jipprovdi d-data mitlubapedaġġ ma jiżvelax din id-data lil
ebda fornitur ieħor tas-servizz ta' pedaġġ. Għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri
meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li, fejn il-kollettur tad-data hu integrat ma'
fornitur tas-servizz ta' pedaġġ f'entità waħda, id-data tintuża biss
għall-konformità mill-kollettur tal-pedaġġ mal-obbligi tiegħu lejn l-
awtoritajiet tat-taxxa.
10. Id-data mogħtija mill-fornituri tal-EETS lill-kolletturi tal-
pedaġġi għandha tiġi pproċessata f'konformità mar-regoli tal-Unjoni
dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data personali kif jinsabu spjegati fir-
Regolament (UE) 2016/679, kif ukoll mal-liġijiet, ir-regolamenti jew
id-dispożizzjonijiet amministrattivi nazzjonali li jittrasponu d-Direttivi
2002/58/KE u (UE) 2016/680.
11. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni,
mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex ikomplu jiddefinixxu l-
obbligi tal-fornituri tal-EETS dwar
(a) il-monitoraġġ tal-prestazzjoni tal-livell tas-servizz
tagħhom, u kooperazzjoni mal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ fil-verifika
tal- awditi;
(b) kooperazzjoni
mal-Kolletturi
tal-Pedaġġ
fil-
prestazzjoni tat-testijiet tas-sistemi tal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ;
(c) appoġġ tekniku u tas-servizz lil utenti tal-EETS u
personalizzazzjoni ta' OBE;
(d)
kontijiet mibgħuta lil utenti tal-EETS;
(e) l-informazzjoni li fornituri tal-EETS iridu jipprovdu
lill-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi u li tissemma fil-paragrafu 7; u
(f) li utent tal-EETS jiġi mgħarraf b'sitwazzjoni
identifikata ta' pedaġġ mhux iddikjarat; Dawk l-atti ta'
implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati skont il-proċedura ta'
eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 31(2).
Artikolu 6
Drittijiet u obbligi tal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ
1. Fejn dominju tal-EETS ma jikkonformax mal-
kondizzjonijiet ta' interoperabilità teknika u proċedurali tal-EETS
ipprovduti f'din id-Direttiva, l-Istat Membru li t-territorju tiegħu jinsab
fid-dominju tal-EETS jeħtieġ li jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżgura li
l-kollettur tal-pedaġġ responsabbli jivvaluta l-problema mal-partijiet
interessati kkonċernati u, jekk ikun jaqa' taħt ir-responsabbiltajiet
tiegħu, jieħu azzjonijiet ta' rimedju bil-ħsieb li jiżgura l-
interoperabilità tas- sistema ta' pedaġġ. Fejn meħtieġ, l-Istat Membru
jeħtieġ li jaġġorna r-reġistru msemmi fil-punt (a) l-Artikolu 21(1) fir-
rigward tal-informazzjoni msemmija fil-punt (a) tiegħu.
2. Kull Stat Membru jeħtieġ li jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżgura li kwalunkwe kollettur tal-pedaġġi responsabbli minn dominju
tal-EETS fit-territorju ta' dak l-Istat Membru jiżviluppa u jżomm
dikjarazzjoni dwar id-dominju tal-EETS li tistipula l-kondizzjonijiet
ġenerali biex il-fornituri tal-EETS jaċċessaw id-dominji tal-EETS
tagħhom, skont l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 9.
Fejn tinħoloq sistema elettronika ta' pedaġġ fit-territorju ta' Stat
Membru dak l-Istat Membru jeħtieġ li jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżgura li l-kollettur tal-pedaġġ nominat responsabbli mis-sistema
jippubblika d-dikjarazzjoni dwar id- dominju tal-EETS billi javża
biżżejjed minn qabel biex tkun tista' ssir akkreditazzjoni tal-fornituri
tal-EETS interessati mhux aktar tard minn xahar qabel il-varar
operazzjonali tas-sistema l-ġdida, filwaqt li jitqies kif dovut it-tul tal-
proċess tal-valutazzjoni tal-konformità mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet u tal-
idoneità għall-użu tal-kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità msemmi fl-
Artikolu 15(1).
Fejn sistema elettronika ta' pedaġġ fit-territorju ta' Stat Membru
tiġi modifikata sostanzjalment, dak l-Istat Membru jeħtieġ li jieħu l-
miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżgura li l-kollettur tal-pedaġġ responsabbli mis-
sistema jippubblika d-dikjarazzjoni aġġornata dwar id-dominju tal-
EETS biżżejjed minn qabel biex fornituri tal-EETS diġà akkreditati
jkunu jistgħu jadattaw il-kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità tagħhom għar-
rekwiżiti l-ġodda u jiksbu akkreditazzjoni mill-ġdid mhux aktar tard
minn xahar qabel il-varar operazzjonali tas-sistema modifikata,
b'kunsiderazzjoni dovuta għat-tul tal-proċess tal- valutazzjoni tal-
konformità mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet u tal-idoneità għall-użu tal-
kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità msemmija fl-Artikolu 15(1).
3. L-Istati Membri jeħtieġ li jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ responsabbli minn dominji tal-EETS
fit-territorju tagħhom jaċċettaw fuq bażi nondiskriminatorja
kwalunkwe fornitur tal-EETS li jitlob li jipprovdi l-EETS fid-dominji
tal-EETS imsemmija.
Aċċettazzjoni ta' fornitur tal-EETS f'dominju tal-EETS għandha
tkun soġġetta għall-konformità tal-fornitur mal-obbligi u l-
kundizzjonijiet ġenerali stipulati fid-dikjarazzjoni tad-dominju tal-
EETS.
L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi ma jirrikjedux li l-fornituri tal-
EETS jużaw soluzzjonijiet jew proċessi tekniċi speċifiċi li jxekklu l-
interoperabilità tal-kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità ta' fornitur tal-EETS
b'sistemi elettroniċi ta' pedaġġ f'dominji oħra tal-EETS.
Jekk kollettur tal-pedaġġ u fornitur tal-EETS ma jkunux jistgħu
jilħqu qbil, il-kwistjoni tista' tiġi referuta lill-Korp Konċiljatorju
responsabbli mid-dominju rilevanti tal-pedaġġ.
4. Kull Stat Membru jeħtieġ li jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżgura li l-kuntratti bejn il-kollettur tal-pedaġġi u l- fornitur tal-EETS
dwar il-forniment tal-EETS fit-territorju ta' dak l-Istat Membru,
jippermettu li l-kontijiet għall-pedaġġ jinħarġu lill-utent tal-EETS
direttament mill-fornitur tal-EETS.
Il-kollettur tal-pedaġġi jista' jirrikjedi li l-fornitur tal-EETS
joħroġ fatturi għall-utent f'isem u għan-nom tal-kollettur tal- pedaġġi,
u l-fornitur tal-EETS għandu jikkonforma ma' dik it-talba.
5. Il-pedaġġ mitlub mill-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi lill-utenti tal-
EETS ma għandux jaqbeż il-pedaġġ nazzjonali jew lokali
korrispondenti. Dan huwa mingħajr preġudizzju għad-dritt tal-Istati
Membri li jintroduċu ribassi jew skontijiet biex jippromwovu l-użu ta'
pagamenti elettroniċi tal-pedaġġ. Ir-ribassi jew skontijiet kollha tal-
utenti tal-OBE fuq il-pedaġġi offruti minn Stat Membru jew minn
kollettur tal-pedaġġ għandhom ikunu trasparenti, imħabbra
pubblikament u disponibbli bl-istess kondizzjonijiet lill-klijenti tal-
fornituri tal-EETS.
6. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ jaċċettaw fuq id-dominji tal-EETS
tagħhom kwalunkwe OBE operazzjonali minn fornituri tal-EETS li
magħhom għandhom relazzjonijiet kuntrattwali li ġew iċċertifikati
skont il-proċedura definita fl-atti ta' implimentazzjoni msemmija fl-
Artikolu 15(7) u li ma jidhrux fuq lista ta' OBE invalidat imsemmi fl-
Artikolu 5(5).
7. Fil-każ ta' ħsara fl-EETS attribwibbli għall-kollettur tal-
pedaġġi, il-kollettur tal-pedaġġi għandu jforni mod ta' servizz
imnaqqas li jippermetti lill-vetturi bit-tagħmir imsemmi fil-paragrafu 6
jiċċirkolaw fis-sikurezza b'dewmien minimu u mingħajr ma jiġu
suspettati b'nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq.
8. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw
li
l-kolletturi
tal-pedaġġ
jikkollaboraw
b'mod
nondiskriminatorju mal-fornituri tal-EETS jew il-manifatturi jew l-
entitajiet notifikati bil-ħsieb li tiġi vvalutata l-idoneità għall-użu tal-
kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità fid-dominji tal-EETS tagħhom.
9. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni,
sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, li jistabbilixxu l-kontenut
minimu tad-dikjarazzjoni tad-dominju tal-EETS, inkluż
(a)
ir-rekwiżiti għall-fornituri tal-EETS;
(b) il-kondizzjonijiet
proċedurali
inklużi
l-
kondizzjonijiet kummerċjali;
(c)
il-proċedura
tal-akkreditazzjoni
tal-fornituri
tal-
EETS; u
(d)
id-data dwar il-kuntest tal-pedaġġ.
Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati skont il-
proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 31(2).
Artikolu 7
Remunerazzjoni
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-fornituri tal-EETS ikunu intitolati li jiġu remunerati mill-
kollettur tal-pedaġġ.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-metodoloġija għad-definizzjoni tar-remunerazzjoni tal-
fornituri tal-EETS tkun trasparenti, nondiskriminatorja u identika
għall-fornituri kollha tal-EETS akkreditati għal dominju tal-EETS
partikolari. Għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li l-
metodoloġija tiġi ppubblikata bħala parti mill-kondizzjonijiet
kummerċjali fid-dikjarazzjoni tad-dominju tal-EETS.
3. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li fid-dominji tal-EETS b'fornitur ewlieni tas- servizz, il-
metodoloġija għall-kalkolu tar-remunerazzjoni tal-fornituri tal-EETS
issegwi l-istess struttura tar-remunerazzjoni ta' servizzi komparabbli
pprovduti mill-fornitur ewlieni tas-servizz. L-ammont ta'
remunerazzjoni tal-fornituri tal-EETS jista' jkun differenti mir-
remunerazzjoni tal-fornitur ewlieni tas-servizz sakemm ikun ġustifikat
minn
(a) l-ispiża tar-rekwiżiti u l-obbligi speċifiċi tal-fornitur
ewlieni tas-servizz u mhux tal-fornituri tal-EETS; u
(b) il-ħtieġa li jitnaqqsu, mir-remunerazzjoni tal-fornituri
tal-EETS, il-ħlasijiet fissi imposti mill-kollettur tal-pedaġġ
abbażi tal-ispejjeż, għall-kollettur tal-pedaġġ, li jipprovdi, jopera
u jżomm sistema konformi mal-EETS fid-dominju tal-pedaġġ
tiegħu, inklużi l-kostijiet tal-akkreditazzjoni, fejn dawn il-
kostijiet mhumiex inklużi fil-pedaġġ.
Artikolu 8
Pedaġġi
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li fejn, bil-għan li tiġi stabbilita t-tariffa tal- pedaġġ
applikabbli għal vettura partikolari, ikun hemm diskrepanza bejn il-
klassifikazzjoni tal-vettura użata mill-fornitur tal-EETS u l-kollettur
tal-pedaġġ, il-klassifikazzjoni tal-kollettur tal-pedaġġ tipprevali,
sakemm ma tingħatax prova ta' żball.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-kollettur tal-pedaġġ ikun intitolat li jirrikjedi ħlas
mingħand fornitur tal-EETS għal kwalunkwe dikjarazzjoni tal-pedaġġ
sostanzjata u kwalunkwe nondikjarazzjoni tal- pedaġġ sostanzjata
relatata ma' kwalunkwe kont ta' utent tal-EETS ġestit minn dak il-
fornitur tal-EETS.
3. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li fejn fornitur tal-EETS ikun bagħat lil kollettur tal-pedaġġi
lista ta' OBE invalidat imsemmi fl-Artikolu 5(5), il-fornitur tal-EETS
ma għandux jinżamm responsabbli għal kwalunkwe pedaġġ ieħor
imġarrab permezz tal-użu ta' tali OBE invalidat. L-għadd ta' entrati fil-
lista tal-OBE invalidat, il- format tal-lista u l-frekwenza tal-
aġġornament tagħha għandhom jiġu maqbula bejn il-kolletturi tal-
pedaġġi u l-fornituri tal-EETS.
4. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li, f'sistemi tal-pedaġġ li jużaw il-microwave, il- kolletturi
tal-pedaġġ jikkomunikaw lill-fornituri tal-EETS dikjarazzjonijiet tal-
pedaġġ sostanzjati għal pedaġġi mġarrba mill-utenti tal-EETS
rispettivi tagħhom.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità
mal-Artikolu 30, sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex
tistabbilixxi d-dettalji għall-klassifikazzjoni tal-vetturi bil-għan li jiġu
stabbiliti l-iskemi tariffarji applikabbli, inkluża kwalunkwe proċedura
meħtieġa biex jiġu stabbiliti tali skemi. Is-sett tal-parametri tal-
klassifikazzjoni tal-vetturi li għandu jiġi aċċettat mill-EETS ma
għandux jirrestrinġi l-għażla tal-iskemi tariffarji mill-kolletturi tal-
pedaġġ. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tiżgura biżżejjed flessibilità biex
tippermetti li s-sett tal-parametri ta' klassifikazzjoni jkun aċċettat mill-
EETS biex jevolvi skont il-ħtiġijiet futuri prevedibbli. Dawk l-atti
għandhom ikunu mingħajr preġudizzju għad- definizzjoni, fid-
Direttiva 1999/62/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill * , tal-
parametri li skonthom għandhom ivarjaw il-pedaġġi.
Artikolu 9
Kontabilità
L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-entitajiet legali li jipprovdu servizzi ta' pedaġġ iżommu
rekords tal-kontabilità li jagħmlu distinzjoni ċara possibbli bejn l-
ispejjeż u d-dħul relatati mal-forniment tas- servizz ta' pedaġġ u l-
ispejjeż u d-dħul relatati ma' attivitajiet oħra. L-informazzjoni dwar l-
ispejjeż u d-dħul relatati mal- forniment tas-servizz ta' pedaġġ għandha
tiġi pprovduta, fuq talba, lill-Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni jew il-korp
* Id-Direttiva 1999/62/KE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta' Ġunju
1999 dwar il-ħlas li jrid isir minn vetturi ta' merkanzija tqila għall-użu ta' ċerti
infrastrutturi (ĠU L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 42).
ġudizzjarju rilevanti. L-Istati Membri għandhom ukoll jieħdu l-miżuri
meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li s-sussidji inkroċjati bejn l-attivitajiet
imwettqa fir-rwol ta' fornitur tas-servizz ta' pedaġġ u attivitajiet oħra
ma jkunux permessi.
Artikolu 10
Drittijiet u obbligi tal-utenti tal-EETS
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jippermettu lill-utenti tal-EETS jabbonaw mal-EETS permezz ta'
kwalunkwe fornitur tal-EETS, irrispettivament min-nazzjonalità
tagħhom, l-Istat Membru ta' residenza jew l- Istat Membru li fih tkun
irreġistrata l-vettura. Meta jkunu deħlin f'kuntratt, l-utenti tal-EETS
għandhom jiġu infurmati kif xieraq dwar il-mezzi validi ta' ħlas, skont
ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, dwar l-ipproċessar tad-data personali
tagħhom u d-drittijiet li jirriżultaw mil-leġislazzjoni applikabbli dwar
il-protezzjoni tad-data personali.
2. Il-ħlas ta' pedaġġ minn utent tal-EETS lill-fornitur tal-
EETS tiegħu għandu jitqies li jissodisfa l-obbligi tal-ħlas li l- utent tal-
EETS ikollu lejn il-kollettur tal-pedaġġ rilevanti. Jekk jiġu installati
jew jinġarru abbord vettura żewġ OBA jew aktar, hija r-responsabilità
tal-utent tal-EETS li juża jew jattiva l-OBE rilevanti għad-dominju
speċifiku tal-EETS.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità
mal-Artikolu 30, sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex
tkompli tiddefinixxi aktar l-obbligi tal-utenti tal-EETS rigward
(a)
il-forniment tad-data lill-fornitur tal-EETS; u
(b)
l-użu u l-immaniġġjar tal-OBE.
KAPITOLU III
KORP TA' KONĊILJAZZJONI
Artikolu 11
Stabbiliment u funzjonijiet
1. Kull Stat Membru li jkollu minn tal-anqas dominju tal-
EETS wieħed għandu jaħtar jew jistabbilixxi Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni
sabiex jiffaċilita l-medjazzjoni bejn il-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi b'dominju
tal-EETS li jkun jinsab fit-territorju tiegħu u l-fornituri tal-EETS li
jkollhom kuntratti jew ikunu jinsabu f'negozjati kuntrattwali ma' dawk
il-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi.
2. Il-Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni għandu jkollu s-setgħa li, b'mod
partikolari, jivverifika li l-kondizzjonijiet kuntrattwali imposti minn
kollettur tal-pedaġġ fuq il-fornituri tal-EETS ikunu nondiskriminatorji.
Huwa għandu jkollu s-setgħa li jivverifika li l-fornituri tal-EETS jiġu
remunerati f'konformità mal-prinċipji previsti fl-Artikolu 7.
3. L-Istati Membri msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandhom
jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li l-Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni
tagħhom fl-istruttura organizzattiva u legali jkun indipendenti mill-
interessi kummerċjali tal-kolletturi tal- pedaġġi u tal-fornituri tas-
servizz tal-pedaġġ.
Artikolu 12
Proċedura ta' medjazzjoni
1. Kull Stat Membru b'minn tal-inqas dominju EETS wieħed
għandu jistabbilixxi proċedura ta' medjazzjoni sabiex jippermetti lil
kollettur tal-pedaġġ jew fornitur tal-EETS li jitlob lill-Korp ta'
Konċiljazzjoni rilevanti biex jintervjeni fi kwalunkwe tilwim relatat
mar-relazzjonijiet jew in-negozjati kuntrattwali tagħhom.
2. Il-proċedura ta' medjazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1
għandha tirrikjedi li l-Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni jiddikjara, fi żmien
xahar wara li jkun irċieva talba biex jintervjeni, jekk id-dokumenti
kollha neċessarji għall-medjazzjoni humiex fil- pussess tiegħu.
3. Il-proċedura ta' medjazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1
għandha tirrikjedi li l-Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni joħroġ l- opinjoni tiegħu
dwar tilwim mhux aktar tard minn sitt xhur wara li jkun irċieva t-talba
biex jintervjeni.
4. Sabiex jiffaċilitaw il-kompiti tiegħu, l-Istati Membri
għandhom jagħtu lill-Korp ta' Konċiljazzjoni s-setgħa biex jitlob
informazzjoni rilevanti mingħand il-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ, il-fornituri
tal-EETS u kwalunkwe parti terza attiva fil- forniment tal-EETS fl-
Istat Membru kkonċernat.
5. L-Istati Membri b'minn tal-inqas dominju EETS wieħed u
l-Kummissjoni għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw l-
iskambju ta' informazzjoni bejn il-Korpi ta' Konċiljazzjoni rigward ix-
xogħol, il-prinċipji ta' gwida u l-prattiki tagħhom.
KAPITOLU IV
DISPOŻIZZJONIJIET TEKNIĊI
Artikolu 13
Servizz uniku kontinwu
L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-EETS jiġi fornut lill-utenti tal-EETS bħala servizz uniku
kontinwu.
Dan ifisser li
(a) ladarba l-parametri tal-klassifikazzjoni tal-vettura,
inklużi dawk varjabbli, ikunu nħażnu jew ġew iddikjarati, jew it-
tnejn, ma jkunx hemm bżonn ta' aktar intervent uman fil-vettura
waqt vjaġġ sakemm ma jkunx hemm modifika fil- karatteristiċi
tal-vettura; u
(b) l-interazzjoni umana ma' biċċa tagħmir partikolari ta'
OBE tibqa' l-istess ikun xi jkun id-dominju tal-EETS.
Artikolu 14
Elementi addizzjonali rigward l-EETS
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li l-interazzjoni tal-utenti tal-EETS mal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ
bħala parti mill-EETS tkun limitata, fejn applikabbli, għall-proċess ta'
fatturazzjoni skont l-Artikolu 6(4) u għall-proċessi ta' infurzar. L-
interazzjonijiet bejn l-utenti tal-EETS u l-fornituri tal-EETS, jew l-
OBE tagħhom, jistgħu jkunu speċifiċi għal kull fornitur tal-EETS,
mingħajr ma jikkompromettu l-interoperabilità tal-EETS.
2. L-Istati Membri jistgħu jesiġu li l-fornituri tas-servizz tal-
pedaġġ, inkluż il-fornituri tal-EETS, fuq it-talba tal- awtoritajiet tal-
Istati Membri, jipprovdu data tat-traffiku fir-rigward tal-klijenti
tagħhom, soġġett għal konformità mar- regoli applikabbli dwar il-
protezzjoni tad-data. Tali data għandha tintuża biss mill-Istati Membri
għall-fini ta' politiki tat- traffiku u t-titjib tal-ġestjoni tat-traffiku u d-
data ma tistax tintuża biex jiġu identifikati l-klijenti.
3. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta, sa mhux aktar tard mid-
19 ta' Ottubru 2019, atti ta' implimentazzjoni li jistabbilixxu l-
ispeċifikazzjonijiet tal-interfaċċi elettroniċi bejn il-kostitwenti tal-
interoperabilità tal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi, il- fornituri tal-EETS u l-
utenti tal-EETS, inkluż, fejn applikabbli, il-kontenut tal-messaġġi
skambjati bejn l-atturi permezz ta' dawk l-interfaċċi. Dawk l-atti ta'
implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati skont il-proċedura ta' eżami
msemmija fl- Artikolu 31(2).
Artikolu 15
Kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità
1. Fejn tinħoloq sistema elettronika ta' pedaġġ ġdida fit-
territorju ta' Stat Membru, dak l-Istat Membru għandu jieħu l- miżuri
meħtieġa biex jiżgura li l-kollettur tal-pedaġġ nominat responsabbli
għas-sistema jistabbilixxi u jippubblika fid- dikjarazzjoni tad-dominju
tal-EETS l-ippjanar dettaljat tal-proċess ta' valutazzjoni ta' konformità
ma' speċifikazzjonijiet u tal-idoneità għall-użu tal-kostitwenti tal-
interoperabilità, li jippermetti l-akkreditazzjoni tal-fornituri tal-EETS
interessati mhux aktar tard minn xahar qabel il-varar operazzjonali tas-
sistema l-ġdida.
Fejn sistema elettronika ta' pedaġġ ġdida fit-territorju ta' Stat
Membru tkun modifikata sostanzjalment, dak l-Istat Membru għandu
jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżgura li l-kollettur tal-pedaġġi
responsabbli għas-sistema jistabbilixxi u jippubblika fid-dikjarazzjoni
tad-dominju tal-EETS, flimkien mal-elementi msemmija fl-ewwel
subparagrafu, l-ippjanar dettaljat tal-valutazzjoni mill-ġdid tal-
konformità mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet u tal-idoneità għall-użu tal-
kostitwenti tal- interoperabilità tal-fornituri tal-EETS diġà akkreditati
fis-sistema qabel il-modifika sostanzjali tagħha. L-ippjanar għandu
jippermetti akkreditazzjoni mill-ġdid tal-fornituri tal-EETS
ikkonċernati mhux aktar tard minn xahar qabel il-varar operazzjonali
tas-sistema modifikata.
Il-kollettur tal-pedaġġi għandu jirrispetta dak l-ippjanar.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li kull kollettur tal-pedaġġi responsabbli għal dominju tal-
EETS fit-territorju ta' dak l-Istat Membru jistabbilixxi ambjent ta' test
li fih il-fornitur tal-EETS jew ir-rappreżentanti awtorizzati tiegħu
jistgħu jivverifikaw li l-OBE tiegħu huwa adattat għall-użu fid-
dominju tal-EETS tal-kollettur tal-pedaġġi u jikseb ċertifikazzjoni tat-
tlestija b'suċċess tat-testijiet rispettivi. L-Istati Membri għandhom
jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jippermettu lill-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi
jistabbilixxu ambjent ta' test uniku għal aktar minn dominju tal-EETS
wieħed, u biex jippermettu lil rappreżentant awtorizzat wieħed
jivverifika jekk huwiex adattat l-użu ta' tip wieħed ta' OBE f'isem aktar
minn fornitur tal-EETS wieħed.
L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jippermettu lill-kolletturi tal-pedaġġi jitolbu lill-fornituri tal- EETS
jew lir-rappreżentanti awtorizzati tagħhom biex ikopru l-ispiża tat-
testijiet rispettivi.
3. L-Istati Membri ma għandhomx jipprojbixxu, jirrestrinġu
jew jostakolaw it-tqegħid fis-suq ta' kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità
għall-użu fl-EETS meta dawn ikollhom il-marka KE jew inkella
dikjarazzjoni tal-konformità mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet jew dikjarazzjoni
tal-idoneità għall-użu, jew it-tnejn. Partikolarment, l-Istati Membri ma
għandhomx jitolbu verifiki li diġà jkunu twettqu bħala parti mill-
proċedura għall-verifika tal-konformità mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet jew l-
idoneità għall- użu, jew it-tnejn.
4. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità
mal-Artikolu 30, sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex
tistabbilixxi r-rekwiżiti għall-kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità rigward
is-sikurezza u s-saħħa, l-affidabilità u d- disponibilità, il-protezzjoni
ambjentali, il-kompatibilità teknika, is-sigurtà u l-privatezza u l-operat
u l-ġestjoni.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità
mal-Artikolu 30, sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex
tistabbilixxi r-rekwiżiti ġenerali għall-infrastruttura rigward
(a) l-eżattezza tad-data tad-dikjarazzjoni tal-pedaġġ bil-
ħsieb li tiggarantixxi trattament ugwali bejn l-utenti tal-EETS
fir- rigward tal-pedaġġi u l-ħlasijiet;
(b) l-identifikazzjoni, permezz tal-OBE tal-fornitur tal-
EETS responsabbli;
(c) l-użu ta' standards miftuħa għall-kostitwenti tal-
interoperabilità tat-tagħmir tal-EETS;
(d)
l-integrazzjoni tal-OBE fil-vettura; u
(e) is-sinjalazzjoni lis-sewwieq tar-rekwiżit li titħallas
tariffa tat-triq.
6. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni,
sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex tistabbilixxi r-
rekwiżiti speċifiċi għall-infrastruttura li ġejjin
(a) rekwiżiti dwar protokolli komuni ta' komunikazzjoni
bejn it-tagħmir tal-Kolletturi tal-Pedaġġi u t-tagħmir tal-
fornituri tal-EETS;
(b) rekwiżiti dwar mekkaniżmi biex il-kolletturi tal-
pedaġġi jidentifikaw jekk vettura li qed tiċċirkola fid-dominju
tal- EETS tagħhom tkunx mgħammra b'OBE validu u li
jiffunzjona;
(c)
rekwiżiti dwar l-interfaċċa bejn il-bniedem u l-magna
fl-OBE;
(d) rekwiżiti li japplikaw speċifikament għall-kostitwenti
tal-interoperabilità fis-sistemi ta' pedaġġ ibbażati fuq teknoloġiji
tal-microwave; u
(e) rekwiżiti li japplikaw b'mod speċifiku f'sistemi ta'
pedaġġ ibbażati fuq Sistema Globali ta' Navigazzjoni bis-
Satellita (GNSS).
Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni għandhom jiġu adottati skont il-
proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 31(2).
7. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti ta' implimentazzjoni,
sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, sabiex tistabbilixxi l-
proċedura li għandha tiġi applikata mill-Istati Membri għall-
valutazzjoni tal-konformità mal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet u l-idoneità għall-
użu tal-kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità, inklużi l-kontenut u l-format
tad-dikjarazzjonijiet tal-KE. Dawk l-atti ta' implimentazzjoni
għandhom jiġu adottati skont il-proċedura ta' eżami msemmija fl-
Artikolu 31(2).
KAPITOLU V
KLAWSOLI TA' SALVAGWARDJA
Artikolu 16
Proċedura ta' salvagwardja
1. Meta Stat Membru jkollu raġuni biex jemmen li kostitwenti
tal-interoperabilità li jkollhom il-marka KE u li tqiegħdu fis-suq
x'aktarx li meta jintużaw kif suppost ma jissodisfawx ir-rekwiżiti
rilevanti, huwa għandu jieħu l-passi kollha meħtieġa biex jirrestrinġi l-
kamp ta' applikazzjoni tagħhom, jipprojbixxi l-użu tagħhom jew
jirtirahom mis-suq. L-Istat Membru għandu immedjatament jinforma
lill-Kummissjoni dwar il-miżuri meħuda u jagħti r-raġunijiet għad-
deċiżjoni tiegħu, u jiddikjara partikolarment jekk in-nuqqas fil-
konformità huwiex dovut għal
(a) applikazzjoni mhux korretta tal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet
tekniċi; jew
(b)
inadegwatezza tal-ispeċifikazzjonijiet tekniċi.
2. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tikkonsulta lill-Istat Membru
kkonċernat, il-manifattur, il-fornitur tal-EETS jew ir-rappreżentanti
awtorizzati tagħhom stabbiliti fl-Unjoni kemm jista' jkun malajr. Fejn,
wara dik il-konsultazzjoni, il- Kummissjoni tistabbilixxi li il-miżura
hija ġustifikata, hija għandha immedjatament tinforma lill-Istat
Membru kkonċernat kif ukoll lill-Istati Membri l-oħra. Madankollu,
fejn, wara dik il-konsultazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni tistabbilixxi li l-
miżura mhix ġustifikata, hija għandha immedjatament tinforma lill-
Istat Membru kkonċernat, kif ukoll lill-manifattur jew lir-
rappreżentant awtorizzat tiegħu stabbilit fl-Unjoni u lill-Istati Membri
l-oħra.
3. Fejn kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità li jkollhom il-marka
KE ma jikkonformawx mar-rekwiżiti tal-interoperabilità, l- Istat
Membru kompetenti għandu jitlob lill-manifattur jew lir-rappreżentat
awtorizzat tiegħu stabbilit fl-Unjoni sabiex jistabbilixxi mill-ġdid il-
kostitwenti tal-interoperabilità għal stat ta' konformità mal-
ispeċifikazzjonijiet jew l-idoneità għall-użu, jew it-tnejn, skont il-
kondizzjonijiet stabbiliti minn dak l-Istat Membru u għandu jinforma
lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istat Membri l-oħra dwar dan.
Artikolu 17
Trasparenza tal-valutazzjonijiet
Kwalunkwe deċiżjoni meħuda minn Stat Membru jew kollettur
tal-pedaġġi
dwar
il-valutazzjoni
tal-konformità
mal-
ispeċifikazzjonijiet jew l-idoneità għall-użu tal-kostitwenti tal-
interoperabilità u kwalunkwe deċiżjoni meħuda skont l- Artikolu 16
għandha tistabbilixxi fid-dettall ir-raġunijiet li fuqhom tkun ibbażata.
Din għandha tkun innotifikata kemm jista' jkun malajr lill-manifattur,
il-fornitur tal-EETS jew ir-rappreżentanti awtorizzati tagħhom li jkunu
kkonċernati, flimkien ma' indikazzjoni tar-rimedji disponibbli skont il-
liġijiet fis-seħħ fl-Istat Membru kkonċernat u tal-limiti ta' żmien
permessi għall-eżerċizzju ta' tali rimedji.
KAPITOLU VI
ARRANĠAMENTI AMMINISTRATTIVI
Artikolu 18
Uffiċċju ta' kuntatt uniku
Kull Stat Membru b'mill-inqas żewġ dominji tal-EETS fit-
territorju tiegħu għandu jinnomina uffiċċju ta' kuntatt uniku għall-
fornituri tal-EETS. L-Istat Membru għandu jagħmel pubbliċi d-dettalji
ta' kuntatt ta' dak l-uffiċċju, u jipprovdihom, fuq talba, lill-fornituri
interessati tal-EETS. L-Istat Membru għandu jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa
biex jiżgura li, fuq talba tal- fornitur tal-EETS, l-uffiċċju ta' kuntatt
jiffaċilita u jikkoordina kuntatti amministrattivi bikrija bejn il-fornitur
tal-EETS u l- kolletturi tal-pedaġġ responsabbli għad-dominji tal-
EETS fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru. L-uffiċċju ta' kuntatt jista' jkun
persuna fiżika jew korp pubbliku jew privat.
Artikolu 19
Korpi nnotifikati
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jinnotifikaw lill-Kummissjoni u
lill-Istati Membri l-oħra dwar kull korp intitolat biex iwettaq jew
jissorvelja l-proċedura għall-valutazzjoni tal-konformità mal-
ispeċifikazzjonijiet jew l-idoneità għall-użu msemmija fl-atti ta'
implimentazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 15(7), filwaqt li jindikaw il-
qasam tal-kompetenza ta' kull entità, u n-numri tal-identifikazzjoni
miksuba minn qabel mingħand il-Kummissjoni. Il-Kummissjoni
għandha tippubblika f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea l-lista
tal-korpi, in-numru tal-identifikazzjoni u l-oqsma tal-kompetenza
tagħhom, u għandha żżomm il-lista aġġornata
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom japplikaw il-kriterji previsti fl-
atti delegati msemmija fil-paragrafu 5 ta' dan l-Artikolu għall-
valutazzjoni tal-korpi li għandhom jiġu notifikati. Il-korpi li
jissodisfaw il-kriterji tal-valutazzjoni previsti fl- istandards rilevanti
Ewropej għandhom jitqiesu li jissodisfaw il-kriterji msemmija.
3. Stat Membru għandu jirtira l-approvazzjoni minn korp li
ma jibqax jissodisfa l-kriterji previsti fl-atti delegati msemmija fil-
paragrafu 5 ta' dan l-Artikolu. Huwa għandu jinforma immedjatament
lill-Kummissjoni u lill-Istati Membri l-oħra b'dan.
4. Jekk Stat Membru jew il-Kummissjoni jidhrilhom li korp
notifikat minn Stat Membru ieħor ma jissodisfax il-kriterji previsti fl-
atti delegati msemmija fil-paragrafu 5 ta' dan l-Artikolu, il-kwistjoni
għandha titressaq quddiem il-Kumitat tal- Pedaġġ Elettroniku msemmi
fl-Artikolu 31(1), li għandu jagħti l-opinjoni tiegħu fi żmien tliet xhur.
Fid-dawl tal-opinjoni ta' dak il-Kumitat, il-Kummissjoni għandha
tinforma lill-Istat Membru li nnotifika lill-korp inkwistjoni bi
kwalunkwe tibdila meħtieġa biex il-korp notifikat ikun jista' jżomm l-
istatus li jkun ingħatalu.
5. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tadotta atti delegati f'konformità
mal-Artikolu 30, sa mhux aktar tard mid-19 ta' Ottubru 2019, biex
tistabbilixxi l-kriterji minimi ta' eliġibbiltà għall-korpi notifikati.
Artikolu 20
Grupp ta' Koordinazzjoni
Grupp ta' Koordinazzjoni tal-korpi notifikati skont l-Artikolu
19(1) (il-"Grupp ta' Koordinazzjoni") għandu jiġi stabbilit bħala grupp
ta' ħidma tal-Kumitat tal-Pedaġġ Elettroniku msemmi fl-Artikolu
31(1), skont ir-Regoli ta' Proċedura ta' dak il-Kumitat.
Artikolu 21
Reġistri
1. Għall-finijiet tal-implimentazzjoni ta' din d-Direttiva, kull
Stat Membru għandu jżomm reġistru elettroniku nazzjonali ta' dan li
(a) id-dominji tal-EETS fit-territorju tiegħu, inkluż
informazzjoni li tirrigwarda
(i)
il-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ korrispondenti;
(ii)
it-teknoloġiji tal-pedaġġ użati;
(iii) id-data dwar il-kuntest tal-pedaġġ;
(iv) id-dikjarazzjoni tad-dominju tal-EETS; u
(v) il-fornituri tal-EETS li għandhom kuntratti tal-
EETS mal-kolletturi tal-pedaġġ attivi fit-territorju ta' dak l-
Istat Membru.
(b) il-fornituri tal-EETS li lilhom ikun ippermetta r-
reġistrazzjoni f'konformità mal-Artikolu 4; u
(c) id-dettalji ta' uffiċċju ta' kuntatt uniku msemmi fl-
Artikolu 18 għall-EETS, inkluż l-indirizz tal-posta elettronika ta'
kuntatt u n-numru tat-telefon.
Sakemm ma jkunx speċifikat mod ieħor, l-Istati Membri
għandhom jivverifikaw tal-inqas darba fis-sena li r-rekwiżiti stabbiliti
f'punti (a), (d), (e) u (f) tal-Artikolu 4 jkunu għadhom sodisfatti, u
għandhom jaġġornaw ir-reġistri kif xieraq. Ir- reġistru għandu jkun fih
ukoll il-konklużjonijiet tal-awditu previst fil-punt (e) tal-Artikolu 4.
Stat Membru ma għandux jinżamm responsabbli għall-azzjonijiet tal-
Fornituri tal-EETS msemmija fir-reġistru tiegħu.
2. Stati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
jiżguraw li d-data kollha li tinsab fir-reġistru elettroniku nazzjonali
tinżamm aġġornata u hija preċiża.
3. Ir-reġistri għandhom ikunu elettronikament aċċessibbli
għall-pubbliku.
4. Dawn ir-reġistri għandhom ikunu disponibbli mid-19 ta'
Ottubru 2021.
5. Fit-tmiem kull sena kalendarja, l-awtoritajiet tal-Istati
Membri responsabbli mir-reġistri għandhom jikkomunikaw, lill-
Kummissjoni, b'mezzi elettroniċi, ir-reġistri tad-dominji tal-EETS u
tal-fornituri tal-EETS. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tqiegħed l-
informazzjoni għad-dispożizzjoni tal-Istati Membri oħra. Għandha
tinġibed l-attenzjoni tal-Istat Membru tar- reġistrazzjoni u tal-
Kummissjoni dwar kwalunkwe inkonsistenza fis-sitwazzjoni fi Stat
Membru.
KAPITOLU VII
SISTEMI PILOTA
Artikolu 22
Sistemi pilota tal-pedaġġ
1. Sabiex jippermettu l-iżvilupp tekniku tal-EETS, l-Istati
Membri jistgħu jawtorizzaw b'mod temporanju, f'partijiet limitati tad-
dominju tal-pedaġġ tagħhom u b'mod parallel mas-sistema tal-ilmenti
tal-EETS, sistemi tal-pedaġġ pilota li jinkorporaw teknoloġiji jew
kunċetti ġodda li ma jikkonformawx ma' dispożizzjoni waħda jew
aktar ta' din id-Direttiva.
2. Il-fornituri tal-EETS ma għandhomx ikunu obbligati
jipparteċipaw f'sistemi tal-pedaġġ pilota.
3. Qabel ma tibda sistema pilota ta' pedaġġ, l-Istat Membru
kkonċernat għandu jitlob l-awtorizzazzjoni tal- Kummissjoni. Il-
Kummissjoni għandha toħroġ l-awtorizzazzjoni jew tirrifjutaha,
f'forma ta' Deċiżjoni, fi żmien sitt xhur mill-mument li tkun irċeviet it-
talba. Il-Kummissjoni tista' tirrifjuta l-awtorizzazzjoni jekk is-sistema
pilota ta' pedaġġ tista' tippreġudika l-funzjonament korrett tas-sistema
elettronika ta' pedaġġ regolari jew tal-EETS. Il-perijodu inizjali ta'
dawn l-awtorizzazzjonijiet ma għandux jaqbeż it-tliet snin.
KAPITOLU VIII
SKAMBJU TA' INFORMAZZJONI DWAR IN-NUQQAS TA'
ĦLAS TA' TARIFFI TAT-TRIQ
Artikolu 23
Proċedura għall-iskambju ta' informazzjoni bejn l-Istati Membri
1. Sabiex ikunu jistgħu jiġu identifikati l-vettura u s-sid jew
id-detentur ta' dik il-vettura, li għaliha ġie stabbilit li ma sarx il-ħlas ta'
tariffa tat-triq, kull Stat Membru għandu jagħti aċċess biss lill-punti ta'
kuntatt nazzjonali ta' Stati Membri oħra għad-data nazzjonali li ġejja
dwar ir-reġistrazzjoni tal-vetturi, bis-setgħa li jwettqu tiftix
awtomatizzat dwarhom
(a)
data relatata mal-vetturi; u
(b) data relatata mas-sidien jew mad-detenturi tal-
vettura. L-elementi tad-data msemmija fil-punti (a) u (b) u li
huma meħtieġa biex isir tiftix awtomattizat għandhom
jikkonformaw mal-Anness I.
2. Għall-finijiet tal-iskambju ta' data msemmi fil-paragrafu 1,
kull Stat Membru għandu jaħtar punt ta' kuntatt nazzjonali. L-Istati
Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw li l-
iskambju ta' informazzjoni bejn l-Istati Membri jsir biss bejn il-punti
ta' kuntatt nazzjonali. Is-setgħat tal-punti ta' kuntatt nazzjonali
għandhom ikunu rregolati bil-liġi applikabbli tal-Istat Membru
kkonċernat. F'dak il-proċess ta' skambju ta' data, għandha tingħata
attenzjoni partikolari lill-protezzjoni xierqa tad-data personali.
3. Meta jsir tiftix awtomatizzat fil-forma ta' talba maħruġa, il-
punt ta' kuntatt nazzjonali tal-Istat Membru li fit- territorju tiegħu kien
hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq għandu juża n-numru ta'
reġistrazzjoni kollu kemm hu.
Dan it-tiftix awtomatizzat għandu jsir f'konformità mal-proċeduri
msemmija fil-punti 2 u 3 tal-Kapitolu 3 tal-Anness tad-Deċiżjoni
tal-Kunsill 2008/616/ĠAI * u mar-rekwiżiti tal-Anness I ta' din id-
Direttiva.
L-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas tal-ħlas ta'
tariffa tat-triq għandu juża d-data miksuba sabiex jiġi stabbilit min
hu responsabbli għan-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' din it-tariffa.
4. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex
ikun żgurat li l-iskambju ta' informazzjoni jsir bl-użu tal- applikazzjoni
tas-software tas-Sistema ta' Informazzjoni Ewropea tal-Liċenzji tal-
Vetturi u tas-Sewqan (Eucaris) u l- verżjonijiet emendati ta' dan is-
software, f'konformità mal-Anness I ta' din id-Direttiva u mal-punti 2
u 3 tal-Kapitolu 3 tal-Anness tad-Deċiżjoni 2008/616/ĠAI.
5. Kull Stat Membru għandu jħallas l-ispejjeż tiegħu stess li
jirriżultaw mill-amministrazzjoni, l-użu u l-manutenzjoni tal-
applikazzjonijiet tas-software imsemmija fil-paragrafu 4.
* Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 2008/616/ĠAI tat-23 ta' Ġunju 2008 dwar l-implimen-
tazzjoni tad-Deċiżjoni 2008/615/ĠAI dwar it-titjib tal- koperazzjoni transkon-
finali, b'mod partikolari fil-ġlieda kontra t-terroriżmu u l-kriminalità
transkonfinali (ĠU L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 12).
Artikolu 24
Ittra ta' informazzjoni dwar nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq
1. L-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas ta'
ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq għandu jiddeċiedi jekk għandux jibda
proċedimenti ta' segwitu f'dak li jirrigwarda n-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa
tat-triq.
F'każ li l-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas
ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq jiddeċiedi li jibda tali proċedimenti,
f'konformità mal-liġi nazzjonali tiegħu, dak l-Istat Membru għandu
jinforma lis-sid, lid-detentur tal-vettura jew alternattivament lill-
persuna identifikata ssuspettata li naqset milli tħallas it-tariffa tat-triq.
Din l-informazzjoni għandha, skont kif ikun applikabbli taħt il-
liġi nazzjonali, tinkludi l-konsegwenzi legali tagħhom fit- territorju
tal-Istat Membru fejn kien hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq
skont il-liġi ta' dak l-Istat Membru.
2. Meta jkun qed jibgħat l-ittra ta' informazzjoni lis-sid, lid-
detentur tal-vettura jew alternattivament lill-persuna identifikata
ssuspettata li naqset milli tħallas it-tariffa tat-triq, l-Istat Membru fejn
seħħ in-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat- triq għandu, skont il-liġi
nazzjonali tiegħu, jinkludi kwalunkwe informazzjoni rilevanti,
partikolarment dwar in-natura ta' dan in-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-
triq, il-post, id-data u l-ħin tan-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq, it-
titolu tat-testi tal-liġi nazzjonali miksura, id-dritt għall-appell u ta'
aċċess għall-informazzjoni, u s-sanzjoni u, fejn xieraq, id-data li
tikkonċerna t-tagħmir li ntuża biex jiġi identifikat in-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta'
tariffa tat-triq. Għal dak l-għan, l-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu
kien hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq għandu jibbaża l-ittra ta'
informazzjoni fuq il-mudell stabbilit fl-Anness II.
3. F'każ li l-Istat Membru fejn li fit-territorju tiegħu kien
hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq jiddeċiedi li jibda proċedimenti
ta' segwitu fir-rigward tan-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq, dan
għandu, bil-għan li jiżgura li d-drittijiet fundamentali jiġu rispettati,
jibgħat l-ittra ta' informazzjoni bil-lingwa tad-dokument ta'
reġistrazzjoni tal-vettura, fejn disponibbli, jew b'waħda mil-lingwi
uffiċjali tal-Istat Membru tar-reġistrazzjoni.
Artikolu 25
Il-proċedimenti ta' segwitu mill-entitajiet tal-ġbir
1. L-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas ta'
ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq jista' jipprovdi lill-entità responsabbli mill-ġbir
tat-tariffa tat-triq id-data miksuba permezz tal-proċedura msemmija fl-
Artikolu 23(1) biss jekk jiġu ssodisfati l-kundizzjonijiet li ġejjin
(a)
id-data trasferita tkun limitata għal dak li jkun
meħtieġ minn dik l-entità biex tikseb it-tariffa tat-triq dovuta;
(b) il-proċedura biex tinkiseb it-tariffa tat-triq dovuta
tkun konformi mal-proċedura prevista fl-Artikolu 24;
(c) l-entità kkonċernata tkun responsabbli għat-twettiq ta'
din il-proċedura; u
(d) il-konformità mal-ordni ta' ħlas maħruġa mill-entità li
tirċievi d-data ġġib fi tmiemu n-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat- triq.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiżguraw li d-data pprovduta
lill-entità responsabbli tintuża biss għall-għan li tinkiseb it- tariffa tat-
triq dovuta u titħassar immedjatament ladarba t-tariffa tat-triq titħallas
jew, jekk in-nuqqas ta' ħlas jippersisti, fi żmien raġonevoli wara t-
trasferiment tad-data, li għandu jiġi stabbilit mill-Istat Membru.
Artikolu 26
Rappurtar mill-Istati Membri lill-Kummissjoni
Kull Stat Membru għandu jibgħat rapport komprensiv lill-
Kummissjoni sad-19 ta' April 2023 u sussegwentement kull tliet
snin.
Ir-rapport komprensiv għandu jindika n-numru ta' każijiet ta' tiftix
awtomatizzat li jkunu saru mill-Istat Membru li fih seħħ nuqqas ta'
ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq indirizzat lill-punt ta' kuntatt nazzjonali tal-
Istat Membru tar-reġistrazzjoni, wara l-każijiet ta' nuqqas ta' ħlas
tat-tariffa tat-triq li jkunu seħħew fit-territorju tiegħu, flimkien ma'
n-numru ta' talbiet li ma rnexxewx.
Ir-rapport komprensiv għandu jinkludi wkoll deskrizzjoni tas-
sitwazzjoni fil-livell nazzjonali b'rabta mas-segwitu li jikkonċerna
nuqqasijiet ta' ħlas tat-tariffi tat-triq, abbażi tal-proporzjon ta' tali
nuqqasijiet ta' ħlas tat-tariffi tat-triq li ngħataw segwitu b'ittri ta'
informazzjoni.
Artikolu 27
Protezzjoni tad-data
1. Ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 u l-liġijiet, ir-regolamenti
jew id-dispożizzjonijiet amministrattivi nazzjonali li jittrasponu d-
Direttivi 2002/58/KE u (UE) 2016/680 għandhom japplikaw għad-
data personali pproċessata skont din id- Direttiva.
2. L-Istati Membri għandhom, skont il-leġiżlazzjoni
applikabbli dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data, jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa,
sabiex jiżguraw li
(a) l-ipproċessar tad-data personali għall-finijiet tal-
Artikoli 23, 24 u 25 ikun limitat għat-tipi ta' data elenkati fl-
Anness I għal din id-Direttiva;
(b) id-data personali tkun preċiża, tinżamm aġġornata u
li t-talbiet għar-rettifika jew għat-tħassir jiġu ttrattati mingħajr
dewmien żejjed; u
(c)
jiġi stabbilit limitu ta' żmien għall-ħżin tad-data
personali. L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri neċessarji
biex jiżguraw li d-data personali proċessata taħt din id-Direttiva
tintuża biss għall-finijiet ta'
(a) identifikazzjoni ta' awturi suspettati ta' reati fid-
dawl tal-obbligu li jitħallsu t-tariffi tat-triq fl-ambitu tal-
Artikolu 5(8);
(b) żgurar tal-konformità tal-kollettur tal-pedaġġi
fir-rigward tal-obbligi tiegħu lejn l-awtoritajiet tat-taxxa fl-
ambitu tal-Artikolu 5(9); u
(c) identifikazzjoni tal-vettura u s-sid jew id-
detentur tal-vettura li għaliha ġie stabbilit nuqqas ta' ħlas ta'
tariffa tat- triq fl-ambitu tal-Artikoli 23 u 24.
L-Istati Membri għandhom jieħdu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżguraw
li s-suġġetti tad-data jkollhom l-istess drittijiet ta' informazzjoni,
aċċess, rettifika, tħassir u restrizzjoni tal-ipproċessar u li jressqu
lment quddiem awtorità superviżorja tal- protezzjoni tad-data,
kumpens u rimedju ġudizzjarju effettiv kif previst fir-Regolament
(UE) 2016/679 jew, fejn applikabbli, id-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680.
3. Dan l-Artikolu ma għandux jaffettwa l-possibilità li l-Istati
Membri jirrestrinġu l-ambitu tal-obbligi u d-drittijiet previsti f'ċerti
dispożizzjonijiet tar-Regolament (UE) 2016/679 skont l-Artikolu 23 ta'
dak ir-Regolament għall-finijiet elenkati fl-ewwel paragrafu ta' dak l-
Artikolu.
4. Kwalunkwe persuna kkonċernata għandu jkollha d-dritt li
tikseb, mingħajr dewmien mhux dovut, informazzjoni dwar liema data
personali rreġistrata fl-Istat Membru tar-reġistrazzjoni tkun ġiet
trażmessa lill-Istat Membru fejn kien hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa
tat-triq, inkluża d-data tat-talba u l-awtorità kompetenti tal-Istat
Membru li fih sar nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq.
KAPITOLU IX
DISPOŻIZZJONIJIET FINALI
Artikolu 28
Rapport
1. Sad-19 ta' April 2023, il-Kummissjoni għandha tippreżenta
rapport lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill dwar l-
implimentazzjoni u l-effetti ta' din id-Direttiva, b'mod partikolari fir-
rigward tal-avvanzi u l-użu tal-EETS u l-effikaċja u l- effiċjenza tal-
mekkaniżmu għall-iskambju tad-data fil-qafas tal-investigazzjoni ta'
każijiet ta' nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffi tat-triq.
Ir-rapport għandu janalizza b'mod partikolari dan li ġej
(a) l-effett tal-Artikolu 5(1) u (2) fuq l-użu tal-EETS,
b'attenzjoni partikolari għad-disponibilità tas-servizz f'dominji
żgħar jew periferiċi tal-EETS;
(b) l-effettività tal-Artikoli 23, 24 u 25 dwar it-tnaqqis
fin-numru ta' nuqqasijiet ta' ħlas ta' tariffi tat-triq fl-Unjoni; u
(c) il-progress li jkun sar fir-rigward tal-aspetti tal-
interoperabilità bejn is-sistemi elettroniċi ta' pedaġġ li jużaw il-
pożizzjonament bis-satellita u t-teknoloġija tal-microwave b'5,8
GHz.
2. Ir-rapport għandu jiġi akkumpanjat, jekk ikun xieraq, minn
proposta lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill biex din id-Direttiva
tkompli tiġi riveduta, partikolarment b'rabta mal-elementi li ġejjin
(a) miżuri addizzjonali biex jiġi żgurat li l-EETS ikun
disponibbli fid-dominji kollha tal-EETS, inkluż dawk żgħar u
periferiċi.
(b) miżuri biex ikompli jiġi ffaċilitat l-infurzar
transfruntier tal-obbligu tal-ħlas tat-tariffi tat-triq fl-Unjoni,
inklużi l- arranġamenti ta' assistenza reċiproka; u
(c) l-estensjoni tad-dispożizzjonijiet li jiffaċilitaw l-
infurzar transfruntier għal żoni b'emissjonijiet baxxi, għal żoni
ta' aċċess ristrett jew għal skemi ta' regolamentazzjoni tal-aċċess
urban għall-vetturi.
Artikolu 29
Atti delegati
Il-Kummissjoni tingħata s-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati,
f'konformità mal-Artikolu 30, li jaġġornaw l-Anness I biex titqies
kwalunkwe emenda rilevanti li għandhom isiru lid-Deċiżjonijiet tal-
Kunsill 2008/615/ĠAI * u 2008/616/ĠAI jew fejn dan ikun rikjest
minn xi att legali rilevanti ieħor tal-Unjoni.
Artikolu 30
Eżerċitar tad-delega
1. Is-setgħa ta' adozzjoni ta' atti delegati hija mogħtija lill-
Kummissjoni suġġett għall-kondizzjonijiet stabbiliti f'dan l- Artikolu.
2. Is-setgħa li tadotta atti delegati msemmija fl-Artikolu 8(5),
l-Artikolu 10(3), l-Artikolu 15(4) u (5), l-Artikolu 19(5) u l-Artikolu
29 għandha tingħata lill-Kummissjoni għal perjodu ta' ħames snin mit-
18 ta' April 2019. Il-Kummissjoni għandha tfassal rapport dwar id-
delega tas-setgħa mhux aktar tard minn disa' xhur qabel tmiem il-
perjodu ta' ħames snin. Id-delega ta' setgħa għandha tiġi estiża
awtomatikament għal perjodi ta' żmien identiċi, ħlief jekk il-Parlament
Ewropew jew il-Kunsill joġġezzjona għal tali estensjoni mhux iktar
tard minn tliet xhur qabel it-tmiem ta' kull perjodu.
3. Id-delega tas-setgħat imsemmija fl-Artikolu 8(5), l-
Artikolu 10(3), l-Artikolu 15(4) u (5), l-Artikolu 19(5) u l- Artikolu 29
tista' tiġi rrevokata fi kwalunkwe ħin mill-Parlament Ewropew jew
mill-Kunsill. Id-deċiżjoni ta' revoka għandha ttemm id-delega tas-
setgħa speċifikata f'dik id-deċiżjoni. Għandha ssir effettiva fil-jum
wara l-pubblikazzjoni tad-deċiżjoni f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni
Ewropea jew f'data aktar tard speċifikata fih. Ma għandhiex taffettwa
l-validità ta' kwalunkwe att delegat li jkun diġà fis-seħħ.
4. Qabel ma tadotta att delegat, il-Kummissjoni għandha
tikkonsulta l-esperti nnominati minn kull Stat Membru skont il-
prinċipji stipulati fil-Ftehim Interistituzzjonali tat-13 ta' April 2016
dwar it-Tfassil Aħjar tal-Liġijiet.
* Id-Deċiżjoni tal-Kunsill 2008/615/ĠAI tat-23 ta' Ġunju 2008 dwar it-titjib tal-
kooperazzjoni transkonfinali, b'mod partikolari fil-ġlieda kontra t-terroriżmu u
l-kriminalità transkonfinali (ĠU L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1).
5. Hekk kif tadotta att delegat, il-Kummissjoni għandha
tinnotifikah simultanjament lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill- Kunsill.
6. Att delegat adottat skont l-Artikolu 8(5), l-Artikolu 10(3),
l-Artikolu 15(4) u (5), l-Artikolu 19(5) u l-Artikolu 29 għandu jidħol
fis-seħħ biss jekk ma tkun saret l-ebda oġġezzjoni jew mill-Parlament
Ewropew jew mill-Kunsill fi żmien xahrejn min-notifika ta' dak l-att
lill-Parlament Ewropew u lill-Kunsill jew jekk, qabel ma jagħlaq dak
il-perjodu, il- Parlament Ewropew u l-Kunsill ikunu t-tnejn infurmaw
lill-Kummissjoni li mhumiex se joġġezzjonaw. Dak il-perjodu għandu
jiġi estiż b'xahrejn fuq inizjattiva tal-Parlament Ewropew jew tal-
Kunsill.
Artikolu 31
Proċedura ta' kumitat
1. Il-Kummissjoni ser tiġi assistita mill-Kumitat tal-Pedaġġ
Elettroniku.
Dan il-kumitat għandu jkun kumitat fis-sens tar-Regolament
(UE) Nru 182/2011.
2. Meta ssir referenza għal dan il-paragrafu, għandu japplika
l-Artikolu 5 tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 182/2011. Meta l- kumitat ma
jagħti l-ebda opinjoni, il-Kummissjoni ma għandhiex tadotta l-abbozz
tal-att ta' implimentazzjoni u għandu japplika t-tielet subparagrafu tal-
Artikolu 5(4) tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 182/2011.
Artikolu 32
Traspożizzjoni
1. L-Istati Membri għandhom jadottaw u jippubblikaw, sad-19
ta' Ottubru 2021, il-liġijiet, ir-regolamenti u d- dispożizzjonijiet
amministrattivi meħtieġa biex ikunu konformi mal-Artikoli 1 sa 27 u l-
Annessi I u II. Għandhom mill- ewwel jikkomunikaw it-test ta' dawk
il-miżuri lill-Kummissjoni.
Huma għandhom japplikaw dawk il-miżuri mid-19 ta' Ottubru
2021. Meta l-Istati Membri jadottaw dawk il-miżuri, għandhom
jirreferu għal din id-Direttiva jew għandhom ikunu akkumpanjati minn
din ir-referenza fil-pubblikazzjoni uffiċjali tagħhom. Huma għandhom
jinkludu wkoll dikjarazzjoni li r-referenzi fil-liġijiet, ir-regolamenti, u
d-dispożizzjonijiet amministrattivi eżistenti għad-Direttiva mħassra
b'din id- Direttiva għandhom jiġu interpretati bħala referenzi għal din
id-Direttiva. L-Istati Membri għandhom jiddeċiedu kif din ir-referenza
għandha ssir u kif it-tali dikjarazzjoni għandha tiġi mfassla.
2. L-Istati
Membri
għandhom
jikkomunikaw
lill-
Kummissjoni t-test tad-dispożizzjonijiet ewlenin tal-liġi nazzjonali li
huma jadottaw fil-qasam kopert minn din id-Direttiva.
Artikolu 33
Tħassir
Id-Direttiva 2004/52/KE hija mħassra bis-seħħ mill-20 ta' Ottubru
2021, mingħajr preġudizzju għall-obbligi tal-Istati Membri marbuta
mal-limitu -ta' żmien għat-traspożizzjoni fil-liġi nazzjonali tad-
Direttiva mniżżla fl-Anness III, Parti B.
Referenzi għad-Direttiva mħassra għandhom jinftiehmu bħala
referenzi għal din id-Direttiva u għandhom jinqraw skont it-tabella
ta' korrelazzjoni li tinsab fl-Anness IV.
Artikolu 34
Dħul fis-seħħ
Din id-Direttiva għandha tidħol fis-seħħ fl-għoxrin jum wara l-
pubblikazzjoni tagħha f'Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea.
Artikolu 35
Destinatarji
Din id-Direttiva hi indirizzata lill-Istati Membri.
Magħmul fi Brussell, id-19 ta' Marzu 2019.
Għall-Parlament Ewropew
Il-President
Għall-Kunsill
Il-President
A. TAJANI
G. CIAMBA
ANNESS I
Elementi tad-data meħtieġa biex iseħħ it-tiftix awtomatizzat
imsemmi fl-Artikolu 23(1)
Elementi tad-data pprovduti bħala
riżultat
tat-tiftix
awtomatizzat magħmul skont l-artikolu 23(1)
Parti I. Data relatata mal-vetturi
Parti II. Data relatata mas-sidien jew detenturi tal-vetturi
ANNESS II
MUDELL GĦALL-ITTRA TA' INFORMAZZJONI
imsemmija fl-Artikolu 24
[Paġna ta' quddiem]
[Isem, indirizz u numru tat-telefon ta' min qed jibgħat l-ittra]
[Isem u indirizz tad-destinatarju]
ITTRA TA' INFORMAZZJONI
rigward in-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq li seħħ fi
........................... [isem l-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien
hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq]
Paġna 2
Fil-.................................................................. nuqqas ta' ħlas ta'
tariffa tat-triq bil-vettura bin-numru tar-reġistrazzjoni
[data]
numru
................................................marka
…............................mudell ................................................ ġie osservat
minn ................................
[isem l-entità responsabbli]
[Għażla 1] (1)
Inti rreġistrat/a bħala d-detentur taċ-ċertifikat tar-reġistrazzjoni
tal-vettura msemmija hawn fuq.
[Għażla 2] (1)
Id-detentur taċ-ċertifikat tar-reġistrazzjoni tal-vettura msemmija
hawn fuq indika li int kont qed issuq dik il-vettura meta seħħ in-
nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq.
Id-dettalji rilevanti tan-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat-triq huma
deskritti fil-paġna 3 hawn taħt.
L-ammont tal-penali finanzjarja dovut għan-nuqqas ta' ħlas ta'
tariffa tat-triq huwa ta'........... EUR/munita nazzjonali. (1)
L-ammont tat-tariffa tat-triq li jrid jitħallas hu ta' ............. EUR/
munita nazzjonali. (1)
L-iskadenza għall-ħlas hi .........................
Jekk ma tħallasx din il-penali finanzjarja (1) /tariffa tat-triq, int
imħeġġeġ timla' l-formola tat-tweġiba mehmuża (paġna 4) u tibgħatha
fl-indirizz indikat. (1) . Din l-ittra għandha tiġi pproċessata skont il-liġi
nazzjonali ta' .........................................................................
[isem l-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas ta'
ħlas tat-tariffa tat- triq]
Paġna 3
Dettalji rilevanti dwar in-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq
Data dwar il-vettura li ntużat meta seħħ in-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-
tariffa tat-triq
Numru
tar-reġistrazzjoni….......................................................
Stat Membru tar-reġistrazzjoni: ......................................................
Marka u mudell: .............................................................................
Data dwar in-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq: Il-post, id-data u
l-ħin fejn seħħ in-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq
In-natura u l-klassifikazzjoni ġuridika tan-nuqqas ta' ħlas tat-
tariffa
tat-triq
...................................................................................... Deskrizzjoni
dettaljata
tan-nuqqas
ta'
ħlas
tat-tariffa
tat-triq
Referenza għad-dispożizzjoni jew id-dispożizzjonijiet legali
rilevanti
Deskrizzjoni ta' jew referenza għall-evidenza dwar in-nuqqas ta' ħlas
ta' tariffa tat-triq
Data dwar l-apparat li ntuża għall-identifikazzjoni tan-nuqqas ta'
ħlas tat-tariffa tat-triq (2)
Speċifikazzjoni tat-tagħmir
……………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………........................................
Numru tal-identifikazzjoni tat-tagħmir
Skadenza tal-aħħar kalibrazzjoni tat-tagħmir
(1) Ħassar jekk mhux applikabbli.
(2)
Mhux applikabbli jekk ma jkun intuża l-ebda tagħmir.
29.3.2019 L 91/71 Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea MT
Paġna 4
Formola tar-risposta
(jekk jogħġbok imla l-formola b'ittri kapitali)
A. Identità tas-sewwieq
— Isem sħiħ
— Post u data tat-twelid: .
— Numru tal-liċenzja tas-sewqan: .......................... mogħtija
(data): ..........................u fi (post): .............................................
— Indirizz ………………...............................................
B. Lista ta' mistoqsijiet
1. Il-vettura, tal-marka ................, numru ta' reġistrazzjoni
................., hija rreġistrata f'ismek? ................ iva/le (1) Jekk le, id-
detentur
taċ-ċertifikat
tar-reġistrazzjoni
huwa/hija
……................................................
...... (kunjom, isem, indirizz)
2. Tammetti li ma ħallastx tariffa tat-triq? iva/le (1)
3. Jekk dan ma tammettihx, jekk jogħġbok agħti r-raġunijiet
tiegħek
Jekk jogħġbok, il-formola li mlejt ibagħtha fi żmien 60 jum mid-
data ta' din l-ittra ta' informazzjoni lill-awtorità jew entità li ġejja
fl-indirizz li ġej
INFORMAZZJONI
(Fejn l-ittra ta' informazzjoni tintbagħat mill-entità responsabbli
li tiġbor it-tariffi tat-triq skont l-Artikolu 25): Jekk it-tariffa tat-triq
dovuta ma titħallasx sad-data ta' skadenza stipulata f'din l-ittra ta'
informazzjoni, dan il-każ jiġi mgħoddi lill-awtorità kompetenti ta'
...............isem tal-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm
nuqqas ta' ħlas ta' tariffa tat- triq] u eżaminat minn din l-istess awtorità
kompetenti.
Jekk ma jingħatax segwitu għal dan il-każ, int tiġi infurmat/a fi
żmien 60 jum mid-data tar-riċezzjoni tal-formola tat- tweġiba jew tal-
prova tal-ħlas. (1) / (Fejn l-ittra ta' informazzjoni tintbagħat mill-
awtorità kompetenti tal-Istat Membru): Dan il-każ ser jiġi eżaminat
mill-awtorità
kompetenti
ta'...........................................................................................................
......[isem l-Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas ta'
ħlas tat-tariffa tat- triq]. Jekk ma jingħatax segwitu għal dan il-każ, int
tiġi infurmat/a fi żmien 60 jum mid-data tar-riċezzjoni tal-formola ta'
tweġiba jew tal-prova tal-ħlas. (1)
(1) Ħassar jekk mhux applikabbli.
Jekk jingħata segwitu għal dan il-każ, tapplika l-proċedura li
ġejja
........................................................................[għandha timtela mill-
Istat Membru li fit-territorju tiegħu kien hemm nuqqas ta' ħlas ta'
tariffa tat-triq — x'se tkun il- proċedura ulterjuri, inklużi d-dettalji
dwar il-possibilità u l-proċedura ta' appell kontra d-deċiżjoni li jiġi
segwit il-każ. F'kull każ, dawn id-dettalji għandhom jinkludu: l-isem u
l-indirizz tal-awtorità jew tal-entità inkarigata li ssegwi l-każ; l-
iskadenza għall-ħlas; l-isem u l-indirizz tal-organu ta' appell
ikkonċernat; l-iskadenza għall-appell].
Din l-ittra bħala tali ma twassalx għal konsegwenzi legali.
Ċaħda ta' responsabilità dwar il-protezzjoni tad-data
[Fejn huwa applikabbli r-Regolament (UE) 2016/679
Skont ir-Regolament (UE) 2016/679, inti għandek id-dritt li
titlob aċċess għad-data personali, u r-rettifika jew it-tħassir tagħha jew
ir-restrizzjoni tal-ipproċessar tad-data personali tiegħek jew li
toġġezzjona għall-ipproċessar, kif ukoll id-dritt għall-portabilità tad-
data; Inti għandek ukoll id-dritt li tressaq ilment quddiem [isem u
indirizz tal-awtorità superviżorja rilevanti].
[Fejn hija applikabbli d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/680
Skont [isem il-liġi nazzjonali li tapplika d-Direttiva (UE) 2016/
680], inti għandek id-dritt li titlob mingħand il-kontrollur l-aċċess
għad-data personali u r-rettifika jew it-tħassir tagħha u r-restrizzjoni
tal-ipproċessar tad-data personali tiegħek. Inti għandek ukoll id-dritt li
tressaq ilment quddiem [isem u indirizz tal-awtorità superviżorja
rilevanti].]
ANNESS III
PARTI A
Direttiva mħassra flimkien mal-emenda tagħha
(imsemmija fl-Artikolu 33)
PARTI B
Skadenza għat-traspożizzjoni fil-liġi nazzjonali
(imsemmija fl-Artikolu 33)
ANNESS IV
Tabella ta' Korrelazzjoni