Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ln_2009_208 MT

Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

11 Articles / Provisions · Malta
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Table of Provisions (11)

Statutory Text (11 Articles)

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

L.N. 208 of 2009

VETERINARY SERVICES ACT

(CAP. 437)

Measures for the Eradication of Brucellosis, Tuberculosis and

Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

IN exercise of the powers conferred by article 5(1) of the

Veterinary Services Act, the Minister for Resources and Rural

Affairs, in concurrence with the Minister of Finance, the Economy

and Investment has made the following rules:-

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

(1) The title of these rules is the Measures for the Title and

Eradication of Brucellosis, Tuberculosis and Leucosis in Cattle commencement.

(Amendment) Rules, 2009 and they shall be read and construed as

one with the Measures for the Eradication of Brucellosis, L.N. 314 of

Tubercolosis and Leucosis in Cattle Rules, 2005, hereinafter referred 2005.

to as "the principal rules".

(2) These rules shall come into force on such date as the

Minister may by notice in the Gazette prescribe and different dates

may apply for different provisions of these rules

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

Rule 5 of the principal rules shall be amended as follows

Amends rule 5

of the principal

rules.

(a) in the Maltese text thereof, for the word "endemika"

wherever it occurs in this rule, there shall be substituted the

word "enżootika"; and

(b) immediately after sub-rule (1) thereof, there shall be

added the following new sub-rule

"(1A) (i) The plans for accelerating the

eradication of Enzootic Bovine Leucosis in Malta shall be

those laid down in the Schedule to these rules.

(ii) The Minister shall order the slaughter

of cattle infected with Enzootic Bovine Leucosis and

instruct farmers as to the procedure to be undertaken for

such slaughter.

(iii) The Minister shall compensate

farmers for infected cattle slaughtered in terms of the said

Schedule.".

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

Immediately after rule 10 of the principal rules, there shall Addition of new

Schedule to

be added the following new Schedule

principal rules.

"SCHEDULE

[Rule 5(1A)]

Enzootic Bovine Leucosis (EBL) Compensation Scheme

A.

Definitions & Abbreviations

Cohorts: Animals known to have coexisted with and have had direct or

indirect contact with infected animals, which may reasonably have led to the

spread of infection to the animals in question.

D Farms: Cow farms licensed as Dairy Producers, which deliver fresh milk to

approved plants producing milk for human consumption.

R Farms: Cow farms licensed as Non-Dairy Ruminant Producers, which rear

ruminants but do not deliver fresh milk to approved plants producing milk for

human consumption.

EBL: Enzootic Bovine Leucosis

EBL +ve: Found positive for Enzootic Bovine Leucosis based on serology of

individual serum samples.

EBL –ve: Found negative for Enzootic Bovine Leucosis based on serology of

individual serum samples.

Approved Farms: Those farms which, on inspection by VRFCC personnel,

were found to be of sufficient standard to remain operational without requiring any

modifications or improvements.

Conditionally Approved Farms: Those farms which, on inspection by

VRFCC personnel, were found to be of sufficient standard to remain operational

only if certain modifications or improvements are carried out. These modifications

or improvements shall be carried out within the period of time specified by the

VRFCC in order for the farm to become ‘Approved’. If these modifications or

improvements are not made by the specified deadline, the farm will lose its

‘Conditionally Approved’ status and be classified as ‘Unapproved’.

Initial Sampling: The first eligible collection of individual whole blood

samples which was carried out after the 1st of September 2007.

Subsequent Sampling: Collections of individual whole blood samples which

were carried out after ‘Initial Sampling’ but within the period of 1st September

2007 to 1st March 2009.

Initial Testing: The test carried out on samples collected during ‘Initial

Sampling’.

VRFCC: The Veterinary Regulation, Fisheries Conservation and Control

Division within the Ministry for Resources and Rural Affairs.

B.

Eligibility for Compensation under the EBL Scheme

1. Farmers Eligible for Compensation under the EBL Scheme

In order for a farmer to be eligible for compensation for slaughtered cattle

under this scheme, all the following conditions shall be satisfied

(a)

The farmer shall have been licensed by the department

responsible for Veterinary Services as a cattle farm; either as a dairy producer

(D) or a non-dairy ruminant farmer (R), at the time of slaughter;

(b) The farmer shall own a licensed cattle farm which was

‘approved’ or ‘conditionally approved’ by the department responsible for

Veterinary Services in its most recent inspections, at the time of slaughter;

(c)

The farmer shall allow free access to VRFCC personnel to his /

her farm holding for blood sampling and disease testing.

(d) The farmer shall follow, to the best of his abilities, all advice

given by the MRRA or VRFCC regarding management of EBL and EBL-

infected cattle.

(e)

The farmer shall have a good record of conduct with the VRFCC

as far back as September 2007; having never, in this period, attempted to

disrupt or impede the disease surveillance and control activities of the

VRFCC.

(f)

The farmer shall obey the following rules below regarding the

control of movement of animals

Rules regarding the Control of Movement of Animals

(a) Outward movements from D farms found free of EBL (EBL –ve)

will be allowed.

(b) Inward movement of animals to EBL –ve D farms will not be

allowed unless incoming animals are from EBL –ve farms.

(c)

No movement of male animals will be allowed from R farms to D

farms irrespective of disease status.

(d) No movements, inward or outward, will be allowed from any

cattle farm found to harbour EBL (EBL +ve) except in the case of movement

of male animals from EBL +ve D farms to R farms of either status, on the

condition that no female animals are present on the R farm.

2. Status required of Animals for Farmers to be Eligible for Compensation

In order for a farmer to be eligible for compensation under this scheme, all

the following conditions regarding the status of the animal for which compensation

is claimed shall be satisfied

(a) At the time of slaughter the animal shall have been a female or a

breeding male from a farm which was licensed as a D farm, or a female

animal from a farm which was licensed as an R farm.

(b) At the time of slaughter the animal shall have come from a farm

which was ‘approved’ or ‘conditionally approved’ for hygiene standards by

the VRFCC in its most recent inspections.

(c)

The animal shall be slaughtered at the national abattoir before the

end of December 2012.

(d) The animal shall be traceable back to birth on the national

livestock database.

(e)

The animal shall fit into one of the following categories

Category A Animals

Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on

testing of samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009

and delivered to the abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed by the

VRFCC, between 1st October 2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category A1: Animals found EBL +ve based on testing of samples

taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009, which were older

than 1 year when sampled in this period.

Category A2: The proven offspring of the abovementioned animals

which were aged less than 1 year when sampled between September 2007

and 1st March 2009.

Category B Animals

Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC based on

testing of samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009

and delivered to the abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed by the

VRFCC, between 1st October 2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category B1: Non-infected ‘cohort’ animals from farms found to have

farm infection rates above 80% based on testing of samples taken between

September 2007 and 1st March 2009.

Category B2: Dubitably infected ‘cohort’ animals less than 1 year of

age at the time of sampling which may have been born of infected cows or

may have suckled colostrum or milk from infected cows.

Category B3: Animals infected after ‘initial sampling’ which are found

EBL +ve in tests performed on samples taken subsequent to ‘initial

sampling’ but within the period of 1st September 2007 to 31st December

2010, limited to 10% of the total cow population on that farm at the time of

‘initial sampling’.

Category C Animals

Animals classified as eligible for compensation based on testing of

samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 which are

delivered to the abattoir for slaughter for the farmer’s own reasons and on a

date of the farmer’s choosing, between 1st October 2008 and 31st December

2012. Category C1: Animals found EBL +ve based on testing of samples

taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009, which were older

than 1 year when sampled in this period.

Category C2: The proven offspring of the abovementioned animals

which were aged less than 1 year when sampled between 1st September 2007

and 1st March 2009.

Category C3: Animals infected after ‘initial sampling’ which are found

EBL +ve in tests performed on samples taken subsequent to ‘initial

sampling’ but within the period of 1st September 2007 to 31st December

2010, limited to 10% of the total cow population on that farm at the time of

‘initial sampling’.

Category D Animals

Animals from farms classified as EBL +ve based on testing of samples

taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009 which are delivered

to the abattoir for slaughter for the farmer’s own reasons and on a date of the

farmer’s choosing, between 1st October 2008 and 31st December 2012.

Category D1: Non-infected ‘cohort’ animals from farms found to have

farm infection rates above 80% based on testing of samples taken between

1st September 2007 and 1st March 2009.

Category E Animals

Animals classified as dubitably eligible for compensation. Eligibility

for compensation will be decided by the ad hoc EBL Compensation

Committee, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Committee’.

Category E1: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC

based on testing of samples collected between 1st June 2007 and 1st

September 2007.

Category E2: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC

based on testing of samples collected after 1st March 2009 in the case that

‘initial sampling’ was carried out after this date.

Category E3: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC

based on testing of samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st

March 2009 and delivered to the abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed

by the VRFCC, before 1st October 2008.

Category E4: Animals selected specifically for slaughter by the VRFCC

based on testing of samples taken between 1st September 2007 and 1st

March 2009 and delivered to the abattoir for slaughter as and when instructed

by the VRFCC, after 31st December 2012.

C.

Procedure for Controlling Slaughter and Compensation

1. Blood sampling and testing performed on individual animals over 2

years of age on farms of unknown disease status and all individual animals over 1

year of age on farms known to harbour EBL.

2. Meetings held with individual farmers and their Herd Book reviewed to

determine which animals under one year of age should be suspected as EBL-

infected and recommended for slaughter.

3. The farmer shall be informed of changes or improvements which must

take place on his / her farm before compensation will be paid.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

At least one week prior to the date of slaughter, farmers will be given a

list of animals specified by ear tag number to bring to the abattoir, and a date on

which to bring them. Abattoir officials will also be provided with this same list at

least one week prior to the date of slaughter.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

On arrival at the abattoir, abattoir officials shall ensure that all the listed

animals have been brought and that no more unlisted animals have been brought

than can be slaughtered that day.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

Should a greater number of unlisted animals be brought by a farmer

than is possible to slaughter that day, listed animals will be given priority while

unlisted animals may be kept in lairage at the farmer’s expense until the next

slaughter day.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

Farmers shall submit a request for compensation, giving details of

animal identity registration, age and date of slaughter. It will be ascertained from

abattoir records whether listed animals have been duly slaughtered as claimed.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

The farmer shall be informed in writing regarding compensation to

which he is entitled. This will be in the form of an itemized list showing

compensation owed per animal slaughtered according to categorization under this

scheme.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

The farm shall be inspected to ascertain that the changes or

improvements to the farm holding recommended following the previous VRFCC

inspection have been duly made, ensuring an acceptable level of bio-security.

Malta Government Gazette — Legal Notice 2009 208 — Leucosis in Cattle (Amendment) Rules, 2009

Compensation payments are made.

D.

Calculation of Compensation

Age

Market

Category A

Category B Category C Category D Category E

Category

60% MP (X)

X – 20 %

X – 40 %

Zero

Case

Dependant

€ 755

€ 0

€ 1258 –

€ 2096.44

€ 1258

€ 1006

> 24 month

€

€

€

–

12 - 23

€ 931.75

€ 559

€ 447

month

€ 167

€ 0

€ 279 –

€ 465.87

€ 279

€ 223

4 - 12 month

€ 84

€ 0

€ 140 - 84

0 - 3 month

€ 232.94

€ 140

€ 112

Costs Related to Slaughter to be Deducted from Compensation

If animals are deemed eligible for compensation under the EBL

compensation scheme, then costs related to the slaughter and de-boning of

carcasses will be subtracted from the amount of compensation due to the owner of

the animals. Slaughter costs will be subtracted for each animal, based on their

carcass weight at slaughter. De-boning costs will be subtracted for each animal

over one year of age when slaughtered. Costs for disease-testing will be taken from

slaughter costs for each animal over thirty months of age when slaughtered. The

funds will be transferred to the accounts of the respective sections which covered

the costs initially.

Procedure

Animal Requiring

Cost

Recipient Account

Procedure

Slaughter

All; Compulsory

€ 0.20 / kg dead

National Abattoir

weight minus € 14

Disease Testing

Animals > 30 month;

€ 14 / head

National Veterinary Laboratory

Compulsory

Deboning

Animals > 12 month;

€ 40 / head

National Abattoir / Malta Beef

Compulsory

E. Penalties to be Deducted from Compensation for Disruption of

MRRA or VRFCC Activities

Although animals may fall into one of the categories eligible for

compensation, overall compensation will be reduced should the farmer be found

guilty of actions which may disrupt the activities of the VRFCC.

Cases shall be reviewed by the EBL Compensation Committee and judged

based on their own individual circumstances.

Penalties are deducted from the total amount of compensation to be granted

to the farmer. The table below explains the percentage of compensation to be

deducted from the total amount of compensation due to a farmer for each

individual infringement.

Such penalties are cumulative with additional or repetitive infringements by

different owners of the same farm holding.

Infringement

Code

Penalty

Cancellation of sampling appointments without

15 % reduction in total compensation.

valid reason(s) following written warning.

Unlicensed transfer of an animal.

25 % reduction in total compensation.

Tampering with ear tags.

25 % reduction in total compensation.

Purposeful infection of an animal.

100 % reduction in total compensation.

Template of Table of Calculation of Compensation Owed on a Per Animal

Basis

Animal Age Slaughter

Initial

Subtrac- Subtrac- Subtrac- Subtrac-

Final

Compen-

ID

Weight

Compen- ted for

ted for

ted for

ted for

Compen-

sation

(Kg)

sation Slaughter Disease Deboning Misdemea- sation

Category

Owed (€)

(€)

Testing

(€)

nors (%) Owed (€)

(€)

(A – E)

".

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →