Foodstuffs Rules, 2005
Table of Provisions (9)
Statutory Text (9 Articles)
L.N. 97 of 2005
VETERINARY SERVICES ACT
(CAP. 437)
Sampling Methods and Methods of Analysis for the Official
Control of the Levels for Certain Contaminants in
Foodstuffs Rules, 2005
IN exercise of the powers conferred by article 25 of the Veterinary
Services Act, the Minister for Rural Affairs and the Environment has
made the following rules>-
(1) The title to these rules is the Sampling Methods and Title and scope.
Methods of Analysis for the Official Control of the Levels for Certain
Contaminants in Foodstuffs Rules, 2005.
(2) The scope of these rules is to implement the rules found
under European Union Council Directive 98#53#EC establishing methods
of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs.
Definitions.
For the purposes of these rules -
Methods of sampling for official checking control of the levels of aflatoxins
in certain foodstuffs
1. Purpose and scope
Samples intended for official checking of the levels of aflatoxin content in
foodstuffs shall be taken according to the methods described below. Aggregate
samples thus obtained shall be considered as representative of the lots.
Compliance with maximum limits laid down in European Commission
Regulation 98/1525/EC shall be established on the basis of the levels
determined in the laboratory samples.
2. Definitions
Lot
an identifiable quantity of a food commodity delivered
at one time and determined by the official to have
common characteristics, such as origin, variety, type of
packing, packer, consignor or markings.
Sublot
designated part of a large lot in order to apply the
sampling method on that designated part. Each sublot
must be physically separate and identifiable.
Incremental sample
a quantity of material taken from a single place in the
lot or sublot.
Aggregate sample
the combined total of all the incremental samples taken
from the lot or sublot.
Laboratory sample
sample intended for the laboratory ( = subsample).
3. General provisions
Personnel
Sampling shall be performed by an authorised person as specified by the
competent authority.
Material to be sampled
Each lot which is to be examined must be sampled separately. In accordance
with the specific provisions in point 5 of this Schedule, large lots should be
subdivided into sublots to be sampled separately.
Precautions to be taken
In the course of sampling and preparation of the laboratory samples, precautions
must be taken to avoid any changes which would affect the aflatoxin content,
adversely affect the analytical determination or make the aggregate samples
unrepresentative.
Incremental samples
As far as possible incremental samples should be taken at various places
distributed throughout the lot or sublot. Departure from this procedure must be
recorded in the record provided for in 3.8.
Preparation of the aggregate sample and the laboratory samples (subsamples)
The aggregate sample is made up by uniting and sufficiently mixing the
incremental samples. After mixing, the aggregate sample must be divided into
equal subsamples in accordance with the specific provisions of point 5 of this
Schedule.
The mixing is necessary to ensure that each subsample contains Portions of the
whole lot or sublot.
Replicate samples
The replicate samples for enforcement, trade (defence) and referee purposes are
to be taken from the homogenised laboratory sample, unless this conflicts with
Member States' rules on sampling.
Packaging and transmission of laboratory samples
Each laboratory sample shall be placed in a clean, inert container offering
adequate protection from contamination and against damage in transit. All
necessary precautions shall be taken to avoid any change in composition of the
laboratory sample which might arise during transportation or storage.
Sealing and labelling of laboratory samples
Each sample taken for official use shall be sealed at the place of sampling and
identified following the Member State's regulations. A record must be kept of
each sampling, permitting each lot to be identified unambiguously and giving
the date and place of sampling together with any additional information likely to
be of assistance to the analyst.
4. Explanatory provisions
Different types of lots
Food commodities may be traded in bulk, containers, or individual packings
(sacks, bags, retail packings, etc.). The sampling procedure can be applied to all
the different forms in which the commodities are put on the market.
Without prejudice to the specific provisions as laid down in point 5 of this
Schedule, the following formula can be used as a guide for the sampling of lots
traded in individual packings (sacks, bags, retail packings, etc.)
Sampling frequency (SF) = Weight of the lot x weight of the incremental sample
Weight of the aggregate sample x weight of individual packing
—
Weight: in kg
Sampling frequency (SF): every nth sack or bag from which an
incremental sample must be taken (decimal figures should be rounded to
the nearest whole number).
Weight of the incremental sample
The weight of the incremental sample should be about 300 grams unless
otherwise defined in point 5 of this Schedule and with the exception of spices in
which case the weight of the incremental sample is about 100 grams. In the case
of retail packings, the weight of the incremental sample depends on the weight
of the retail packing.
Number of incremental samples for lots of less than 15 tonnes
The number of incremental samples to be taken depends on the weight of the
lot, with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 100, unless otherwise defined in
point 5 of this Schedule. The figures in the following table may be used to
determine the number of incremental samples to be taken.
Table 1
Number of incremental samples to be taken depending on the
weight of the lot
Lot weight
No of incremental samples
(tonnes)
≤ 0,1
> 0,1 - ≤ 0,2
> 0,2 - ≤ 0,5
> 0,5 - ≤ 1,0
> 1,0 - ≤ 2,0
> 2,0 - ≤ 5,0
> 5,0 - ≤ 10,0
> 10,0 - ≤ 15,0
“the competent authority” means the Veterinary Services
within Malta as provided under article 2 of the Veterinary Services
Act, or any other authority to which such responsibility has been
delegated by the Veterinary Services.
Sample preparation and criteria for methods of analysis used in official
checking of the levels of aflatoxins in certain foodstuffs
1. Introduction
Precautions
Daylight should be excluded as much as possible during the procedure, since
aflatoxin gradually breaks down under the influence of ultra-violet light. As the
distribution of aflatoxin is extremely non-homogeneous, samples should be
prepared — and especially homogenised — with extreme care.
All the material received by the laboratory is to be used for the preparation of
test material.
Calculation of proportion of shell/kernel of whole nuts
The limits fixed for aflatoxins in European Union Commission Regulation (EC)
No 1525/98 apply to the edible part.
The level of aflatoxins in the edible part can be determined by
shelling samples of nuts ‘in shell’ and the level of aflatoxins is directly
determined in the edible part,
homogenise the nuts ‘in shell’ by taking them through the sample
preparation procedure. The sampling and analytical procedure must
estimate the weight of nut kernel in the aggregate sample. The weight of
nut kernel in the aggregate sample is estimated after establishing a suitable
factor for the proportion of nut shell to nut kernel in whole nuts. This
proportion is used to ascertain the amount of kernel in the bulk sample
taken
through
the
sample
preparation
and
analysis
procedure.
Approximately 100 whole nuts are taken at random separately from the lot
or are to be put aside from each aggregate sample. The ratio may, for each
laboratory sample, be obtained by weighing the whole nuts, shelling and
re-weighing the shell and kernel portions. However, the proportion of shell
to kernel may be established by the laboratory from a number of samples
and so can be assumed for future analytical work. But if a particular
laboratory sample is found to be in contravention of any limit, the
proportion should be determined for that sample using the approximately
100 nuts that have been set aside.
2. Treatment of the sample as received in the laboratory
Finely grind and thoroughly mix each laboratory sample using a process that
has been demonstrated to achieve complete homogenisation. In case the
maximum level applies to the dry matter, the dry matter content shall be
determined on a part of the homogenised sample, using a procedure that
hasbeen demonstrated to determine accurately the dry matter content.
3. Subdivision of samples for enforcement and defence purposes
The replicate samples for enforcement, trade (defence) and referee purposes
shall be taken from the homogenised material unless this conflicts with Member
States' rules on sampling.
4. Method of analysis to be used by the laboratory and laboratory control
requirements
Definitions
A number of the most commonly used definitions that the laboratory will be
required to use are given below
The most commonly quoted precision parameters are repeatability and
reproducibility.
r
= repeatability, the value below which the absolute difference
between two single test results obtained under repeatability
conditions (i. e. same sample, same operator, same apparatus, same
laboratory, and short interval of time) may be expected to lie within
a specific probability (typically 95 %) and hence r = 2,8 × s r
sr
= Standard deviation, calculated from results generated under
repeatability conditions
= relative standard deviation, calculated from results generated under
repeatability conditions [(S r/x) × 100], where x is the average of
results over all laboratories and samples
= reproducibility, the value below which the absolute difference
between single test results obtained under reproducibility conditions
(i. e. on identical material obtained by operators in different
laboratories, using the standardised test method) may be expected to
lie within a certain probability (typically 95 %); R = 2,8 s R
= standard deviation, calculated from results under reproducibility
conditions
= relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under
reproducibility conditions [(S R/x) × 100]
General requirements
Methods of analysis used for food control purposes must comply whenever
possible with the provisions of points 1 and 2 of the Annex to European Union
Council Directive 85/591/EEC.
4.3. Specific requirements
Where no specific methods for the determination of aflatoxin levels in
foodstuffs are prescribed at European Community level, laboratories may select
any method provided the selected method meets the following criteria
Concentration
Recommended value
Maximum permitted
range
value
All
Negligible
Recovery — Aflatoxin
0,01-0,05 µg/kg
60 to 120 %
>0,05 µg/kg
70 to 110 %
Recovery — Aflatoxins
< 1,0 µg/kg
50 to 120 %
1-10 µg/kg
70 to 110 %
>10 µg/kg
80 to 110 %
All
As derived from
2 × value derived
Horwitz equation
from Horwitz equation
Precision RSD r may be calculated as 0,66 times precision RSD R at the concentration of interest.
Notes
—
Values to apply to both B 1 and sum of B 1 + B 2 + G 1 + G 2 ,
—
if sum of individual aflatoxins B 1 + B 2 + G 1 + G 2 are to be reported, then
response of each to the analytical system must be either known or
equivalent,
—
the detection limits of the methods used are not stated as the precision
values are given at the concentrations of interest,
—
the precision values are calculated from the Horwitz equation, i. e.: RSD R
= 2 (1-0,5 logC) where
—
RSD R is the relative standard deviation calculated from results
generated under reproducibility conditions [(S R /x) × 100]
—
C is the concentration ratio (i. e. 1 = 100 g/100 g, 0,001 = 1 000
mg/kg).
This is a generalised precision equation which has been found to be independent
of analyte and matrix but solely dependent on concentration for most routine
methods of analysis.
Recovery calculation and reporting of results
The analytical result is to be reported corrected or uncorrected for recovery. The
manner of reporting and the level of recovery must be reported. The analytical
result corrected for recovery is used for checking compliance (see Schedule I,
points 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.4.2, 5.5.1.2 and 5.5.2.3).
The analytical result has to be reported as x +/- U whereby x is the analytical
result and U is the expanded measurement uncertainty, using a coverage factor
of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 %.
Laboratory quality standards
Laboratories must comply with European Council Directive 93/99/EEC.
Mitbug] fl-Istamperija tal-Gvern - Printed at the Government Printing Press
The competent authority shall take all measures necessary to Necessary measures
to ensure sampling
ensure that the sampling for the official control of the levels of aflatoxins for the official
in foodstuffs is carried out in accordance with the methods described in control
of aflatoxins in
Schedule I to these rules.
foodstuffs.
The competent authority shall take all measures necessary to Necessary measures
ensure that sample preparation and methods of analyses used for the to
preparation and
official control of the levels of aflatoxins in foodstuffs comply with the methods of analyses
used for the official
criteria described in Schedule II to these rules.
control of the levels
of aflatoxins in
foodstuffs.
Specific provisions
General survey of the sampling procedure for groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit,
spices and cereals
Table 2
Subdivision of lots into sublots depending on product and lot weight
Commodity
Lot weight
Weight or
Number of
Aggregate
(tonnes)
number of
incremental
sample
sublots
samples
Weight (kg)
Dried figs and other
≥ 15
15-30 tonnes
dried fruit
< 15
—
10-100 ( )
≤ 30
Groundnuts,
≥ 500
100 tonnes
pistachios,
> 125 and < 500
5 sublots
Brazil nuts and other
≥ 15 and ≤ 125
25 tonnes
10-100 ( 1 )
< 15
—
≤ 30
≥ 1 500
500 tonnes
> 300 and < 1 500
3 sublots
≥ 50 and ≤ 300
100 tonnes
< 50
—
10-100 ( )
1-10
≥ 15
25 tonnes
< 15
—
10-100 ( )
1-10
( ) Depending on the lot weight — see point 4.3 or 5.3 of this Schedule.
Groundnuts, pistachios and Brazil nuts
Dried figs
Cereals (lots ≥ 50 tonnes)
Spices
Sampling procedure
On condition that the sublot can be separated physically, each lot must be
subdivided into sublots following Table 2 at point 5.1. Taking into account
that the weight of the lot is not always an exact multiple of the weight of
the sublots, the weight of the sublot may exceed the mentioned weight by
a maximum of 20 %,
each sublot must be sampled separately,
number of incremental samples: 100. In the case of lots under 15 tonnes,
the number of incremental samples to be taken depends on the weight of
the lot, with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 100 (see point 4.3),
weight of the aggregate sample = 30 kg which has to be mixed and to be
divided into three equal subsamples of 10 kg before grinding (this division
into three subsamples is not necessary in the case of groundnuts, nuts,
dried fruit and maize intended for further sorting or other physical
treatment, however, this will depend upon the availability of equipment
which is able to homogenise a 30 kg sample). In cases where the aggregate
sample weights are under 10 kg, the aggregate sample must not be divided
into three subsamples. In the case of spices the aggregate sample weighs
not more than 10 kg and therefore no division in subsamples is necessary,
laboratory sample: a subsample of 10 kg (each subsample must be
separately ground finely and mixed thoroughly to achieve complete
homogenisation, in accordance with the provisions laid down in Schedule
II),
if it is not possible to carry out the method of sampling described above
because of the commercial consequences resulting from damage to the lot
(because of packaging forms, means of transport, etc.) an alternative
method of sampling may be applied provided that it is as representative as
possible and is fully described and documented.
Acceptance of a lot or sublot
For groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit and maize subjected to a sorting or other
physical treatment and spices
— acceptance if the aggregate sample or the average of the subsamples
conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement
uncertainty and correction for recovery,
— rejection if the aggregate sample or the average of the subsamples
exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into
account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery,
for groundnuts, nuts, dried fruit and cereals intended for direct human
consumption and cereals, with the exception of maize, to be subjected to a
sorting or other physical treatment
— acceptance if none of the subsamples exceeds the maximum limit,
taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for
recovery,
— rejection if one or more of the subsamples exceeds the maximum limit
beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement
uncertainty and correction for recovery,
— where the aggregate sample is under 10 kg
— acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum
limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and
correction for recovery,
— rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit
beyond reasonable doubt taking into account analytical uncertainty
and correction for recovery.
Nuts other than groundnuts, pistachios and Brazil nuts
Dried fruit other than figs
Cereals (lots under 50 tonnes)
Sampling procedure
For these products, the sampling procedure laid down in point 5.2.1 may be
applied. However, taking into account the low incidence of contamination for
these products and/or the newer forms of packaging in which products can be
traded, simpler sampling methods may be applied.
For cereal lots under 50 tonnes, a sampling plan consisting of, depending on the
lot weight, 10 to 100 incremental samples each of 100 grams, resulting in an
aggregate sample of 1 to 10 kg may be used. The figures in the following table
can be used to determine the number of incremental samples to be taken.
Table 3
Number of incremental samples to be taken depending on the
weight of the lot of cereals
Lot weight
Number of incremental samples
(tonnes)
≤1
> 1 - ≤3
> 3 - ≤10
> 10 - ≤20
> 20 - ≤50
Acceptance of a lot or sublot
See point 5.2.2.
Milk
Sampling procedure
Sampling in accordance with European Union Commission Decision
91/180/EEC of 14 February 1991 laying down certain methods of analysis and
testing of raw milk and heat-treated milk
number of incremental samples: minimum 5,
weight of aggregate sample: minimum 0,5 kg or litres.
Acceptance of a lot or sublot
Acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit,
taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for
recovery,
rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond
reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and
correction for recovery.
Derived products and compound foods
Milk products
5.5.1.1. Sampling procedure
Sampling in accordance with European Union Commission Directive
87/524/EEC of 6 October 1987 laying down European Community methods of
sampling for chemical analysis for the monitoring of preserved milk products.
Number of incremental samples: minimum 5.
For the other milk products an equivalent method of sampling is used.
5.5.1.2. Acceptance of a lot or sublot
Acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit,
taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for
recovery,
rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond
reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and
correction for recovery.
Other derived products with very small particle weight, i.e. flour, fig paste,
peanut butter (homogeneous distribution of aflatoxin contamination).
5.5.2.1. Sampling procedure
Number of incremental samples: 100. For lots of under 50 tonnes the
number of incremental samples should be 10 to 100, depending on the lot
weight (see Table 3 at point 5.3.1 of this Schedule),
the weight of the incremental sample should be about 100 grams. In the
case of lots in retail packing, the weight of the incremental sample
depends on the weight of the retail packing,
weight of aggregate sample = 1-10 kg sufficiently mixed.
5.5.2.2. Number of samples to be taken
The number of aggregate samples to be taken depends on the lot weight.
The division of large lots into sublots must be done as defined for cereals
in Table 2 under point 5.1,
each sublot must be sampled separately.
Acceptance of a lot or sublot
Acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit,
taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for
recovery,
rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond
reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and
correction for recovery.
Other derived products with a relatively large particle size (heterogeneous
distribution of aflatoxin contamination)
Sampling procedure and acceptance as defined at points 5.2 and 5.3 of
This Schedule for the raw agricultural product.
Foods intended for infants and young children
Sampling procedure
The sampling procedure as mentioned for milk and derived products as well as
for compound food in points 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6 applies.
Acceptance of a lot
Acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit,
taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for
recovery,
—
Rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond
reasonable doubt, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and
correction for recovery.
Sampling at retail stage
Sampling of foodstuffs at the retail stage should be done where possible in
accordance with the above sampling provisions. Where this is not possible,
other effective sampling procedures at retail stage can be used provided that
they ensure sufficient representativeness for the sampled lot.