Legislator Case Law & Legislation
2017_si_464 IE

S.I. No. 464/2017 - European Union (Drinking Water) (Amendment) Regulations 2017

7 Articles / Provisions · Ireland
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Table of Provisions (7)

Statutory Text (7 Articles)

ISB SI

1. Chemical and indicator parameters

For the parameters set out in Table 1, the specified performance characteristics are that the method of analysis used must, as a minimum, be capable of measuring concentrations equal to the parametric value with a limit of quantification, as defined in Article 2(2) of Commission Directive 2009/90/EC, of 30% or less of the relevant parametric value and an uncertainty of measurement as specified in Table 1. The result shall be expressed using at least the same number of significant figures as for the parametric value considered in Tables B and C in Part 1 of the Schedule.

Until 31 December 2019, “trueness”, “precision” and “limit of detection” as specified in Table 2 may be used as an alternative set of performance characteristics to “limit of quantification” and “uncertainty of measurement” as specified respectively in the first paragraph and Table 1.

The uncertainty of measurement laid down in Table 1 shall not be used as an additional tolerance to the parametric values set out in Part 1 of the Schedule.

Table 1

Minimum performance characteristic “Uncertainty of measurement”

Parameters

Uncertainty of measurement(See Note 1) % of the parametric value (except for pH)

Notes

Aluminium

25

Ammonium

40

Antimony

40

Arsenic

30

Benzo(a)pyrene

50

See Note 5

Benzene

40

Boron

25

Bromate

40

Cadmium

25

Chloride

15

Chromium

30

Conductivity

20

Copper

25

Cyanide

30

See Note 6

1,2-dichloroethane

40

Fluoride

20

Hydrogen ion concentration pH (expressed in pH units)

0,2

See Note 7

Iron

30

Lead

25

Manganese

30

Mercury

30

Nickel

25

Nitrate

15

Nitrite

20

Oxidisability

50

See Note 8

Pesticides

30

See Note 9

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

50

See Note 10

Selenium

40

Sodium

15

Sulphate

15

Tetrachloroethene

30

See Note 11

Trichloroethene

40

See Note 11

Trihalomethanes — total

40

See Note 10

Total organic carbon (TOC)

30

See Note 12

Turbidity

30

See Note 13

Acrylamide, epichlorohydrin and vinyl chloride to be controlled by product specification

Table 2

Minimum performance characteristics “Trueness”, “precision” and “limit of detection” — may be used until 31 December 2019

Parameters

Trueness (See Note 2) % of the parametric value (except for pH)

Precision(See Note 3)% of the parametric value (except for pH)

Limit of detection (See Note 4)% of the parametric value (except for pH)

Notes

Aluminium

10

10

10

Ammonium

10

10

10

Antimony

25

25

25

Arsenic

10

10

10

Benzo(a)pyrene

25

25

25

Benzene

25

25

25

Boron

10

10

10

Bromate

25

25

25

Cadmium

10

10

10

Chloride

10

10

10

Chromium

10

10

10

Conductivity

10

10

10

Copper

10

10

10

Cyanide

10

10

10

See Note 6

1,2-dichloroethane

25

25

10

Fluoride

10

10

10

Hydrogen ion concentration pH (expressed in pH units)

0,2

0,2

See Note 7

Iron

10

10

10

Lead

10

10

10

Manganese

10

10

10

Mercury

20

10

20

Nickel

10

10

10

Nitrate

10

10

10

Nitrite

10

10

10

Oxidisability

25

25

10

See Note 8

Pesticides

25

25

25

See Note 9

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

25

25

25

See Note 10

Selenium

10

10

10

Sodium

10

10

10

Sulphate

10

10

10

Tetrachloroethene

25

25

10

See Note 11

Trichloroethene

25

25

10

See Note 11

Trihalomethanes — total

25

25

10

See Note 10

Turbidity

25

25

25

Acrylamide, epichlorohydrin and vinyl chloride to be controlled by product specification

Notes to Tables 1 and 2

Note 1: Uncertainty of measurement is a non-negative parameter characterising the dispersion of the quantity values being attributed to a measurand, based on the information used. The performance criterion for measurement uncertainty (k = 2) is the percentage of the parametric value stated in the table or better. Measurement uncertainty shall be estimated at the level of the parametric value, unless otherwise specified.

Note 2: Trueness is a measure of systematic error, i.e. the difference between the mean value of the large number of repeated measurements and the true value. Further specifications are those set out in ISO 5725.

Note 3: Precision is a measure of random error and is usually expressed as the standard deviation (within and between batches) of the spread of results from the mean. Acceptable precision is twice the relative standard deviation. This term is further specified in ISO 5725.

Note 4: Limit of detection is either three times the standard deviation within a batch of a natural sample containing a low concentration of the parameter, or five times the standard deviation of a blank sample (within a batch).

Note 5: If the value of uncertainty of measurement cannot be met, the best available technique should be selected (up to 60%).

Note 6: The method determines total cyanide in all forms.

Note 7: Values for trueness, precision and uncertainty of measurement are expressed in pH units.

Note 8: Reference method: EN ISO 8467

Note 9: The performance characteristics for individual pesticides are given as an indication. Values for the uncertainty of measurement as low as 30% can be achieved for several pesticides, higher values up to 80 % may be allowed for a number of pesticides.

Note 10: The performance characteristics apply to individual substances, specified at 25% of the parametric value in Part B of Annex I.

Note 11: The performance characteristics apply to individual substances, specified at 50% of the parametric value in Part B of Annex I.

Note 12: The uncertainty of measurement should be estimated at the level of 3 mg/l of the total organic carbon (TOC). CEN 1484 Guidelines for the determination of TOC and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) shall be used.

Note 13: The uncertainty of measurement should be estimated at the level of 1,0 NTU (nephelometric turbidity units) in accordance with EN ISO 7027.”

GIVEN under my Official Seal,

24 October 2017.

EOGHAN MURPHY,

Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Instrument and does not purport to be a legal interpretation.)

These regulations transpose the provisions of Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 amending Annexes II and III to Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption.

Annexes II and III of the Directive lay down the minimum requirements of the monitoring programmes for all water intended for human consumption and the specifications for the method of analysis of different parameters. Those specifications now require updating in the light of scientific and technical progress since the introduction of the original 1998 Directive.

Transposition requires technical amendment to the Schedule to the European Union (Drinking Water) Regulations 2014.

1 O.J. No. L330/32, 5.12.1998

2 O.J. No. 327/1, 22.12.2000

3 O.J. No. L260/6, 7.10.2015

ISB SI

2. Sampling at the point of compliance shall meet the following requirements

(

a

) compliance samples for certain chemical parameters (in particular copper, lead and nickel) shall be taken at the consumers tap without prior flushing. A random daytime sample of one litre volume is to be taken. As an alternative, fixed stagnation time methods may be used provided that, at the supply zone level, this does not result in fewer cases of non-compliance than using the random daytime method;

(

b

) compliance samples for microbiological parameters at the point of compliance shall be taken and handled according to EN ISO 19458, sampling purpose B.

ISB SI

3. Sampling in the distribution network, with the exception of sampling at the consumer’s tap, shall be in accordance with ISO 5667-5. For microbiological parameters, sampling in the distribution network shall be taken and handled according to EN ISO 19458, sampling purpose A.”

SECOND SCHEDULE

“Part 3

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PARAMETERS

The methods of analysis used for the purposes of monitoring and demonstrating compliance with these regulations must be validated and documented in accordance with EN ISO/IEC 17025 or other equivalent standards accepted at international level. Each laboratory at which samples are analysed and each party contracted by a laboratory must apply quality management system practices in accordance with EN ISO/IEC 17025 or other equivalent standards accepted at international level.

In the absence of an analytical method meeting the minimum performance criteria set out in Part B, monitoring shall be carried out using best available techniques not entailing excessive costs.

Part A

MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS FOR WHICH METHODS OF ANALYSIS ARE SPECIFIED

The following principles for methods of analysis of microbiological parameters are given either for reference whenever CEN/ISO method is given or for guidance, pending the possible future adoption (in accordance with the Committee procedure laid down in Article 12 of the Directive) of further CEN/ISO international methods for these parameters. Alternative methods may be used, providing the provisions of Regulations 7(8)(a) and 7(8)(b) are adhered to.

The methods for microbiological parameters are

(

a

)

Escherichia coli (E. coli)

and coliform bacteria (EN ISO 9308-1 or EN ISO 9308-2)

(

b

)

Enterococci (EN ISO 7899-2)

(

c

)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

(EN ISO 16266)

(

d

) Enumeration of culturable microorganisms — colony count 22°C (EN ISO 6222)

(

e

) Enumeration of culturable microorganisms — colony count 36°C (EN ISO 6222)

(

f

)

Clostridium perfringens

including spores (EN ISO 14189).

Part B

CHEMICAL AND INDICATOR PARAMETERS FOR WHICH PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS ARE SPECIFIED

ISB SI

4. Based on the results of the risk assessment, the list of parameters in point 2 of Part B shall be extended and/or the sampling frequencies in point 3 of Part B increased, where any of the following conditions is fulfilled

(

a

) the list of parameters or frequencies set out in this Schedule is not sufficient to fulfil the obligations imposed under Article 7;

(

b

) additional monitoring is required for the purposes of Article 7(10);

(

c

) it is necessary to provide the necessary assurances set out in point (1)(a) of Part A.

ISB SI

5. Based on the results of the risk assessment, the list of parameters set out in point 2 of Part B and the sampling frequencies set out in point 3 of Part B may be reduced provided the following conditions are met

(

a

) the frequency of sampling for E. coli must not be reduced below the one laid down in point 3 of Part B under any circumstances;

(

b

) for all other parameters

(i) the location and frequency of sampling shall be determined in relation to the parameters origin, as well as the variability and long-term trend of its concentration, taking into account Article 5;

(ii) to reduce the minimum sampling frequency of a parameter, as set out in point 3 of Part B, the results obtained from samples collected at regular intervals over a period of at least 3 years from sampling points representative of the whole supply zone must all be less than 60% of the parametric value;

(iii) to remove a parameter from the list of parameters to be monitored, as set out in point 2 of Part B, the results obtained from samples collected at regular intervals over a period of at least 3 years from points representative of the whole supply zone must all be less than 30% of the parametric value;

(iv) the removal of a particular parameter set out in point 2 of Part B from the list of parameters to be monitored shall be based on the result of the risk assessment, informed by the results of monitoring of sources of water intended for human consumption and confirming that human health is protected from the adverse effects of any contamination of water intended for human consumption, as laid down in these regulations;

(v) the sampling frequency may be reduced or a parameter removed from the list of parameters to be monitored as set out in points (ii) and (iii) only if the risk assessment confirms that no factor that can be reasonably anticipated is likely to cause deterioration of the quality of the water intended for human consumption.

ISB SI

6. A risk assessment must be approved by the appropriate supervisory authority and information must be made available showing that a risk assessment has been carried out, together with a summary of its results.

Part D

SAMPLING METHODS AND SAMPLING POINTS

ISB SI

Notice of the making of this Statutory Instrument was published in

“Iris Oifigiúil” of

27

th October

, 2017.

I, EOGHAN MURPHY, Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government, in exercise of the powers conferred on me by

section 3

of the

European Communities Act 1972

(No. 27 of 1972) as amended by the

European Communities Act 2007

(No. 18 of 2007) and for the purpose of giving further effect to Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998

1

, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000

2

and Commission Directive 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015

3

, hereby make the following Regulations

Citation

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →