S.I. No. 511/2009 - Rules of the Superior Courts (Defamation) 2009

1. In this Order

“the Act” means the

Defamation Act 2009

and any reference in this Order to a section shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be deemed to be a reference to a section of the Act;

“defamation action” has the same meaning as in section 2.

II. Verifying affidavit under section 8

2. These rules shall come into operation on the 1st day of January 2010.

3. These rules shall be construed together with the Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 to 2009 and may be cited as the Rules of the Superior Courts (Defamation) 2009.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This does not form part of the instrument and does not purport to be a legal interpretation.)

These rules insert a new Order 1B in, and amend Orders 22, Order 36 and Appendix B, Part II of the Rules of the Superior Courts to facilitate the operation of the

Defamation Act 2009

.

4. (1) Where a defamation action has been brought before the Court in respect of the statement in question and an offer to make amends under section 22 is accepted, an application

(i) under paragraph (

a

) of section 23(1) for an order directing the party who made the offer to take the measures concerned, or

(ii) under paragraph (

b

) of section 23(1) for the leave of the Court to make a correction and apology by means of a statement before the Court in such terms as may be approved by the Court and to give an undertaking as to the manner of their publication

shall be made by motion on notice to the opposing party, and shall be grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party.

(2) Where a defamation action has been brought before the Court in respect of the statement in question, an offer to make amends under section 22 is accepted, and the parties do not agree as to the damages or costs that should be paid by the person who made the offer, the plaintiff shall apply by motion on notice to the defendant for the Court’s directions (which may, without limitation, include an order allowing either party to alter or amend his pleadings) for the conduct of an application for a determination under paragraph (

c

) of section 23(1).

5. (1) Where no defamation action has been brought before the Court in respect of the statement in question and an offer to make amends under section 22 is accepted, an application to the Court

(i) under paragraph (

a

) of section 23(1) for an order directing the party who made the offer to take the measures concerned,

(ii) under paragraph (

b

) of section 23(1) for the leave of the Court to make a correction and apology by means of a statement before the Court in such terms as may be approved by the Court and to give an undertaking as to the manner of their publication, or

(iii) for a determination under paragraph (

c

) of section 23(1)

shall be made by originating notice of motion entitled in the matter of section 23 and in which the person to whom the offer was made shall be named as applicant and the person who made the offer shall be named as respondent, which motion shall be grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party.

(2) Notice of an application under sub-rule (1) shall be given by delivering copies of the originating notice of motion and grounding affidavit and any exhibits thereto to the respondent not later than four clear days before the return date for the originating notice of motion.

(3) Save as otherwise directed by the Court, the respondent to such originating notice of motion may deliver a replying affidavit within two weeks of the delivery to him or her of copies of the said originating notice of motion and grounding affidavit.

(4) Save as otherwise directed by the Court, the applicant may deliver a further affidavit within two weeks of the delivery of any replying affidavit.

6. Save in the case of an application under paragraph (

a

) of section 23(1), the Court may, at the hearing of an originating motion under rule 5 (and in addition to any other order it may make)

(

a

) make such orders or give such directions as seem appropriate for the delivery of further affidavits and for the determination of the application;

(

b

) direct that the application (or any undetermined part of the application) be determined by way of plenary hearing, where it appears to the Court that the subject matter of the application is likely to involve a substantial dispute of fact or it is otherwise necessary or desirable in the interests of justice (and the Court may for that purpose make orders and give directions in relation to the exchange of pleadings or points of claim or defence between the parties).

7. A grounding affidavit referred to in rules 4 and 5 shall

(i) identify with sufficient precision or exhibit a copy or transcript of the statement to which the offer of amends relates;

(ii) exhibit a copy of the offer of amends, and

(iii) give particulars of any agreement asserted to have been made arising from the acceptance of the offer of amends.

8. Where an offer to make amends under section 22 is accepted, an application to the Court under paragraph (

d

) of section 23(1) to bring or proceed with a defamation action against another person in respect of the statement to which the offer to make amends applies shall

(i) where a defamation action has been brought before the Court in respect of the statement in question against that other person, be made by motion in that defamation action on notice to the defendant, grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party;

(ii) where a defamation action has not been brought before the Court in respect of the statement in question against that other person, be made by originating notice of motion entitled in the matter of paragraph (

d

) of section 23(1) and in which the person to whom the offer was made shall be named as applicant and the other person referred to in paragraph (

d

) of section 23(1) shall be named as respondent, which motion shall be grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party, and a copy of which motion and affidavit shall be served on the respondent not later than seven clear days before the date on which the motion is returnable.

V. Notification of evidence of apology under section 24

9. Where a defendant in a defamation action intends to give evidence to which section 24(1) applies, he may notify the plaintiff of such intention in accordance with section 24(2) of the Act by including a statement in his defence of such intention.

VI. Particulars of evidence in mitigation

10. In a defamation action, in which the defendant does not by his defence assert the truth of the statement complained of in accordance with section 16, the defendant shall not be entitled on the trial to give evidence in chief, with a view to mitigation of damages, as to the circumstances under which the defamatory statement was published, or as to the character of the plaintiff, without the leave of the Judge, unless seven days at least before the trial he furnished particulars to the plaintiff of the matters as to which he intends giving evidence.”;

(ii) by the insertion immediately following rule 1(1) of Order 22 of the following

“(1A) In an action for damages for defamation the defendant may, upon giving notice in writing to the plaintiff, pay a sum of money into court in satisfaction of the action in accordance with

section 29

of the

Defamation Act 2009

.”;

(iii) by the substitution for rule 1(3) of Order 22 of the following

“(3) In actions where the defence raises questions of title to land or incorporeal hereditaments, money may not be paid into Court under this rule unless liability is admitted in the defence.”;

(iv) by the deletion from Order 36 of rule 36, and

(v) in Appendix B, Part II, by the substitution for the forms of indorsement (opposite and immediately following the marginal note “Defamation”)

“The plaintiff’s claim is for damages for libel.” and

“The plaintiff’s claim is for damages for slander.” of the following form of indorsement—

“The plaintiff’s claim is for damages for defamation

[State whether an offer to make amends under

section 22

of the

Defamation Act 2009

by a person who has published the statement has been accepted and, if so, provide particulars of the order made under paragraph (

d

) of section 23(1) permitting the bringing of these proceedings.]”

S.I. No. 511 of 2009

RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (DEFAMATION) 2009

Notice of the making of this Statutory Instrument was published in

“Iris Oifigiúil” of

18

th December

, 2009.

We, the Superior Courts Rules Committee, constituted pursuant to the provisions of the

Courts of Justice Act 1936

, section 67, by virtue of the powers conferred upon us by The

Courts of Justice Act 1924

, section 36, and the

Courts of Justice Act 1936

, section 68 (as applied by the

Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961

, section 48), and the

Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961

, section 14, and of all other powers enabling us in this behalf, do hereby make the following Rules of Court.

Dated this 3rd day of December, 2009.

John L. Murray

Nicholas Kearns

William McKechnie

Elizabeth Dunne

Patrick OConnor

Paul McGarry

Noel Rubotham

Maeve Kane

I concur in the making of the following Rules of Court.

Dated this 14th day of December, 2009.

DERMOT AHERN

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform

S.I. No. 511 of 2009

RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (DEFAMATION) 2009