S.I. No. 94/2001 - Rules of the Superior Courts (No. 1) (Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991), 2001
Table of Provisions (10)
Statutory Text (10 Articles)
1. For the purposes of this Order
“the Act” means the
Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991
;
“the Hague Convention” means the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, signed at the Hague on the 25th day of October, 1980 and set out in the First Schedule to the Act;
“The Luxembourg Convention” means the European Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions concerning Custody of Children and on Restoration of Custody of Children, signed at Luxembourg on the 20th day of May, 1980 and set out in the Second Schedule to the Act;
“Contracting State” means a State as defined by section 3 or section 17 of the Act, as the case may be;
“The Central Authority” means the Central Authority appointed by the Minister pursuant to section 8 or section 22 of the Act, as the case may be.
2. This rule shall come into operation on the 23rd day of April, 2001.
3. This rule shall be construed together with the Rules of the Superior Courts, 1986 to 1999 and may be cited as the Rules of the Superior Courts (No. 1) (Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991), 2001.
Explanatory Note
(This note is not part of the Instrument and does not purport to be a legal interpretation).
These Rules precribe procedures in relation to proceedings under the
Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991
.
4. (1) A respondent may deliver a replying affidavit and such replying affidavit shall be served on the applicant within seven days of the grounding affidavit having been served upon the respondent.
(2) The replying affidavit shall set out all grounds of defence being relied upon in opposition to the applicant's application.
(3) The applicant may file a further affidavit replying to any issue or matter raised by the respondent within seven days after the service upon the applicant of the respondent's affidavit.
5. (1) The Court shall, at the earliest opportunity, give such directions as are necessary to provide for an expeditious hearing of the matter and all parties shall comply therewith.
(2) Applications shall be heard on the basis of affidavit evidence only. The Court, at its discretion, may, in exceptional circumstances, direct or permit oral evidence to be adduced.
6. (1) Where an application is about to be made to the Court under Part II or Part III of the Act, the applicant may apply to the Court, pursuant to section 12(1), 12(2), 26(1) or 26(2) of the Act for interim directions.
(2) An application pursuant to section 12(2) or 26(2) may be made
ex parte
to the Court in any case where interim directions are required in a case of urgency. Such an application shall be heard on affidavit unless the Court otherwise directs. Where any oral evidence is heard by the Court in the course of any such application
ex parte,
a note of such evidence shall be prepared by the applicant or the applicant's solicitor and approved by the Court and shall be served upon the respondent forthwith together with a copy of the order made, if any, unless otherwise directed by the Court.
Where a special summons has issued and been served, an application brought pursuant to section 12(1) or 26(1) of the Act shall be brought by notice of motion to the Court. Such notice shall be served upon the other party to the proceeding seven days before the return date and shall specify the directions or relief sought from the Court. The said notice shall be grounded upon the affidavit of the party concerned.
(4) Any application brought under the Act (not being an application mentioned in rule 2(1)) shall be brought by motion on notice in the proceedings.
7. (1) An application made pursuant to section 31(1) of the Act shall be brought by way of notice of motion seeking the variation or revocation of the order of recognition or enforcement previously made by the Court. The said application shall be grounded upon affidavit served seven days before the return date. The said affidavit shall be accompanied by the documentation referred to at Article 13 of the Luxembourg Convention.
8. (1) Where an application is made pursuant to section 36(3) of the Act, the said application shall be brought by way of an originating notice of motion. The said notice of motion shall be entitled
“ The High Court
Family Law,
In the Matter of Section 36(3) of the
Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act, 1991
And in the matter of Foreign Proceedings entitled or to be entitled” “(as the case may be).”
(2) The said notice of motion shall be grounded on affidavit sworn by the applicant setting out
(a) the applicant's interest in the matter;
(b) the manner in which the minor has been taken from or sent or kept out of the State without the consent of any of the persons having the right to determine the child's place of residence under the law of that State;
(c) the persons within the jurisdiction of the Court who may have relevant information;
(d) the grounds for believing that the said persons may have relevant information;
(e) the nature of the relevant information in respect of which an order for disclosure is sought.
9. The provisions of Order 119, rules 2 and 3 solely insofar as they relate to the wearing of a wig and gown shall not apply to any proceedings under this Order”
We, the Superior Courts Rules Committee, constituted pursuant to the provisions of the
Courts of Justice Act, 1936
, section 67, and reconstituted pursuant to the provisions of the
Courts of Justice Act, 1953
, section 15, by virtue of the powers conferred upon us by the
Courts of Justice Act, 1924
, section 36, and the
Courts of Justice Act, 1936
, section 68 (as applied by the
Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act, 1961
, section 48), and the
Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act, 1961
, section 14, and of all other powers enabling us in this behalf, do hereby make the annexed Rules of Court.
Dated this 13th day of July, 2000.
Ronan Keane
Anthony Hunt, B.L.
Frederick Morris
Gordon Holmes
Francis D. Murphy
Patrick Groarke
Adrian Hardiman
P.J. Fitzpatrick
Richard Johnson
I concur in the making of the annexed Rules of Court.
Dated this 20th day of March, 2001.
John O'Donoghue
Aire Dli agus Cirt
Comhionannais agus Athchoirithe Dli.
S.I. NO. 94 OF 2001
RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (NO. 1) (CHILD ABDUCTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF CUSTODY ORDERS ACT, 1991), 2001