Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
935.511 PTLVOTPTLOTNC CH-ZH

Art. 11 : Verordnung über den Personentransport mit Taxis und Limousinen (PTLV)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (22 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 11

1 Inhaberinnen und Inhaber von Taxiausweisen und Taxi- Melde-

fahrzeugbewilligungen teilen dem Amt innert 14 Tagen alle Tatsachen pflichten der

und Ereignisse mit, die

Bewilligungs-

inhaberinnen

a. sich auf die Bewilligungsvoraussetzungen gemäss §§ 3 und 4 PTLG und -inhaber

auswirken oder auswirken können,

b. eine Änderung oder den Ersatz des Taxiausweises oder der Taxi-

fahrzeugbewilligung erfordern.

2 Taxifahrerinnen und Taxifahrer teilen dem Amt innert 14 Tagen

mit, wenn sie ihr Dienstleistungsangebot dauerhaft einstellen, und

geben zugleich den Taxiausweis ab.

3 Inhaberinnen und Inhaber von Zusatzbewilligungen gemäss § 10

teilen dem Amt innert 14 Tagen mit, wenn ihnen am Herkunftsort die

Bewilligung entzogen wurde oder sie ihr Dienstleistungsangebot dauer-

haft einstellen.

1. 1. 24-123

3

935.511

V – Personentransport mit Taxis und Limousinen (PTLV)

C. Betriebsvorschriften für Taxis

Tarife

a. Struktur

← Art. 10 Verordnung über den Personentransport mit Taxis und Limousinen (PTLV) Art. 12 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

SR2 2025 67 · gr (Art. 11 VGS)
Procedural Appeal Regarding Untimely Correction of Formal Defect in Traffic Violation Appeal
This article was cited as the basis for waiving the collection of costs in the appeal proceedings.
SR2 2025 31 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Judicial Delay Complaint Dismissed Upon Withdrawal of Accelerated Appeal
Used to justify the exception to not imposing costs despite the withdrawal of the appeal.
SR2 2025 37 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Withdrawal of Fraud Complaint Appeal
Applied as the exceptional basis to refrain from imposing court costs despite the withdrawal of the appeal.
SR2 2025 27 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Challenge to Prosecutor's Decision Dismissed for Lack of Substantive Grounds
Cited in the dispositive to waive the collection of court costs.
SR2 2025 27 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Challenge to Prosecutor's Decision Dismissed for Lack of Substantive Grounds
This provision was cited to justify the exception of not charging court costs.
SR2 2025 20 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Private Complainant's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Post Security
This provision allows for the exceptional waiver of court costs in the final order.
SR2 2025 24 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS (BR 350.210))
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Pre-Trial Release Upheld Due to Insufficient Legal Challenge to Strong Suspicion of Guilt
This provision was applied to grant an exception regarding the imposition of court costs.
SR2 2025 17 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Private Prosecutor's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Security Deposit
The decision to waive court costs is based on this provision.
SR2 2025 12 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über die Gerichtsgebühren in Strafverfahren [VGS; BR 350.210])
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Insufficient Grounding in False Accusation Claim
This provision allows for the exceptional waiver of costs despite the outcome of the proceedings.
SR2 2024 43 · gr (Art. 1 Abs. 4 i.V.m. Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Prosecutor's Reconsideration Renders Appeal Moot
Applied to waive the imposition of costs because the procedural issue became moot due to the opposing party's action.
SR2 2023 59 · gr (Art. 11 Abs. 1 VGS)
Heirs Withdraw Appeal in Breach of Trust Case; Opposing Party Awarded Legal Costs
Cited as the basis for the exceptional waiver of court costs following the withdrawal of the appeal.
SK2 2015 30 · gr (Art. 11 VGS)
Appeal to Terminate Mandatory Outpatient Psychotherapy Denied Due to Continuing Personality Disorder and Drug Relapse
Cited to establish that the fee range for criminal proceedings under the Juvenile Penal Code is reduced by half compared to adult criminal proceedings.