935.51 PTLGLTL

CH-ZH

Art. 22 : Gesetz über den Personentransport mit Taxis und Limousinen (PTLG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (27 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 22

1 Die Vollzugsbehörde erhebt Gebühren für

a. die Ausstellung und Erneuerung des Taxiausweises gemäss § 3,

b. die Erteilung der Taxifahrzeugbewilligung gemäss § 4,

c. die Ausstellung der Plakette gemäss § 14,

d. die Aufnahme in das Register gemäss § 24 Abs. 1 lit. c und d.

2 Der Regierungsrat regelt die Höhe der Gebühren in einer Verord-

nung.

Gebühren-

erhebung

← Art. 21 Gesetz über den Personentransport mit Taxis und Limousinen (PTLG) Art. 23 →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (9)

S 2021 36 · zg (§ 22 Abs. 2 VRG i.V.m. § 1 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über die Kosten im Verfahren vor dem Verwaltungsgericht (BGS 162.12))

Accident Insurance Premium Calculation for Director Salary Dispute

These procedural rules, cited in E. 8, establish that the appeal procedure before the cantonal court is subject to a fee (Spruchgebühr).

VWBES.2020.45 · so (Art. 22 Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz, VRG, BGS 124.11)

Fence Removal Appeal Dismissed Due to Legal Certainty

Cited in the reasoning concerning the conditions for revoking a building permit, though the final order did not rely on this for the dismissal.

OG AB 18 4 · ar (Art. 22 Abs. 1 Justizgesetz [JG, bGS 145.31])

Claimant v. Enforcement Office Regarding Child Support Collection Delays and Misconduct

Cited as the basis for making complaints about general office activity via a supervisory appeal.

OG ARGVP 2013 3611 · ar (Art. 22 Abs. 1 Justizgesetz [bGS 145.31])

Appeal on Erroneous Instructions, Appellate Jurisdiction Over Mediators, and Supervisory Complaint Costs

Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the High Court as the supervisory body in civil matters.

AC.1996.0069 · vd (art. 22 LGD)

Residents v. Departmental Decision on Construction Waste Sorting Center Operation

This provision underlies the decision being appealed, which temporarily authorized the activity, as mentioned in the reasoning explaining the context of the challenged decision.

AC.1994.0242 · vd (art. 22 LGD)

Property Owner v. Municipality and Canton (Recycling Center Permit Remand)

Cited as a basis for sending the case back to the competent cantonal department for a new decision.

AC.1991.0165 · vd (art. 22 LGD)

Waste Sorting Center Permit Dispute

Cited in the reasoning concerning the right of a private company to obtain authorization for a recycling center.

Verwaltung ARGVP 1988 1045 · ar (Art. 22 Abs. 3 des Gesetzes über das Verwaltungsverfahren (bGS 143.5))

Procedural Compliance, Good Faith, and Local Governance Challenges

The court considered not entering a decision on the appeal due to lack of reasoning and application, as per this article.

Verwaltung ARGVP 1988 1044 · ar (Art. 22 Abs. 3 des Gesetzes überdas Verwaltungsverfahren (bGS 143.5))

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to State Grounds and Motion

This provision is cited in the heading describing the case concerning the extension of time for perfecting a deficient appeal.