910.1
LGLAGR
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 111 : Landwirtschaftsgesetz (LG)
Art. 111
1 Fussgänger sind berechtigt, Flur-, Genossenschafts- und b. Dritter
Holzabfuhrwege ohne besondere Erlaubnis zu benützen.
2 Eigentümer, deren Grundstücke in der Nähe eines Flurwegs lie-
gen, können verlangen, dass ihnen gegen angemessene Entschädigung
ein land- und forstwirtschaftliches Wegrecht eingeräumt wird; es ist im
Grundbuch anzumerken.
3 Kommt eine Einigung unter den beteiligten Grundeigentümern
nicht zustande, entscheidet der Gemeindevorstand47.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
BRGE.III.Nr.0031.20 · zh (§ 111 Abs. 1 LG)
Meteorological Mast Permit Access Dispute
Cited regarding the right of pedestrians to use paths without special permission.
BRGE.III.Nr.0031.20 · zh (§ 111 Abs. 2 LG)
Meteorological Mast Permit Access Dispute
Cited regarding the possibility for non-adjacent owners to obtain a right-of-way for forestry/agricultural purposes, which was deemed insufficient for the planned use.
BRGE.III.Nr.0031.20 · zh (§ 111 Abs. 3 LG)
Meteorological Mast Permit Access Dispute
Cited regarding the decision-making authority of the municipal council (Gemeinderat) if agreement on a right-of-way cannot be reached.
VB.2014.00555 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. I LwG)
Meteorological Mast Permit Appeal: Access Viability and Procedural Defect
This article is listed under the legal norms relevant to the case, although its specific application in the final order is less explicit than the grounds for overturning the decision.
VB.2011.00687 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. I LwG)
Building Permit Setback from Public Way Classification
This provision defining the public use of farm tracks was central to the reasoning that supported the final dismissal of the appeal.
VB.2004.00427 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. I LwG)
Land Consolidation Association Path Compensation Dispute
This provision is listed under the 'Rechtsnormen' section which usually implies relevance, but since the dispositive is not provided, and only the summary of the reasoning leading to 'Abweisung' (dismissal) is present, and this is not explicitly cited in the final orders, it must be excluded based on the strict rule.
VB.2000.00369 · zh (Art. 111 lit. II LwG)
Agricultural Right-of-Way Authority and Use Requirements
This provision, concerning the competence for agricultural right of way decisions, appears to be the basis for the court's substantive ruling regarding the applicability of the regulation.
VB.2000.00369 · zh (Art. 111 lit. III LwG)
Agricultural Right-of-Way Authority and Use Requirements
This provision, concerning the competence for agricultural right of way decisions, appears to be the basis for the court's substantive ruling regarding the applicability of the regulation.
VB.2000.00369 · zh (Art. 111 lit. II LwG)
Appeal Regarding Agricultural Right of Way Jurisdiction and Use Qualification
This provision likely defines the competent authority regarding the agricultural right of way, which is relevant to the outcome.
VB.2000.00369 · zh (Art. 111 lit. III LwG)
Appeal Regarding Agricultural Right of Way Jurisdiction and Use Qualification
This provision likely defines the competent authority regarding the agricultural right of way, which is relevant to the outcome.
VB.2004.00427 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. I LwG)
Land Consolidation Cooperative Compensation for Expropriated Pathway Parcels
This provision is listed under the 'Rechtsnormen' section, but since the dispositive is not explicitly provided, and the decision ends with 'Abweisung' (Dismissal), I can only list provisions explicitly mentioned in the context that informed the final order, assuming they pertain to the final outcome if they are listed under norms.
VB.2011.00687 · zh (Art. 111 Abs. I LwG)
Building Permit Setback Dispute Over Field Path Classification
This article is cited in the description of the case that leads to the qualification of the field path as public, which is the basis for the decision on the required setback.