831.3
ZLGLPCLPI
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 9 : Zusatzleistungsgesetz (ZLG)
Art. 9
25 1 Die Vergütung von Krankheits- und Behinderungskosten
nach Art. 14 ELG ist beschränkt auf eine wirtschaftliche und zweckmäs-
sige Leistungserbringung.
2 Die Ansätze nach Art. 14 Abs. 3–5 ELG gelten als Höchstbeträge.
3 Die Verordnung des Regierungsrates bestimmt das Nähere.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)
ZL.2024.00114 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Claimant v. Insurance Authority: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits
Cited in the reasoning, but not in the operative orders 1-3.
ZL.2024.00114 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 2 ZLG)
Claimant v. Insurance Authority: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits
Cited in the reasoning, but not in the operative orders 1-3.
ZL.2024.00114 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 3 ZLG)
Claimant v. Insurance Authority: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits
Cited in the reasoning, but not in the operative orders 1-3.
ZL.2024.00026 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 2 ZLG)
Disability Benefits Appeal: Caregiver Lost Income Calculation Overturned
Cited to establish the maximum limits for the reimbursed sickness and disability costs under cantonal law.
ZL.2023.00021 · zh (§ 9 ZLG)
Heirs v. Insurer (Dental Coverage Dispute and Substitution Principle)
Cited in Order 1 as part of the legal basis concerning the limitation of reimbursement to economic and appropriate services.
ZL.2017.00091 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Pensioner Appeal: Waived Assets and Dietary Cost Compensation Denial
Although discussed in the reasoning, this cantonal provision was not cited in the dispositive orders (Order 1) as a ground for upholding the decision on diet costs.
VB.2013.00181 · zh (§ 9 Abs. I ZLG)
Social Assistance Coverage for Medically Necessary Non-Compulsory Health Treatments
This provision of the Cantonal Law on Social Assistance Benefits is cited as a legal norm used in the final decision.
ZL.2015.00020 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 3 ZLG)
Supplementary Benefit Repayment and Dental Costs Reimbursement Appeal
Cited in the reasoning, but not explicitly in the numbered dispositive orders, thus excluded.
ZL.2015.00020 · zh (§ 9 ZLG)
Supplementary Benefit Repayment and Dental Costs Reimbursement Appeal
Cited in the reasoning, but not explicitly in the numbered dispositive orders, thus excluded.
ZL.2012.00045 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Insured vs. Social Insurance Office Regarding Dental Restoration Coverage
The appeal was rejected because the planned treatment was not simple and economical according to this provision, in conjunction with Art. 14 Abs. 2 ELG.
ZL.2010.00034 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Insurance Provider Must Cover Full Day Care Costs After Guideline Ruled Invalid
Cited as the cantonal implementation of Art. 14 Abs. 2 ELG, limiting reimbursement to economically and appropriately provided services.
ZL.2010.00034 · zh (§ 9 Abs. 3 ZLG)
Insurance Provider Must Cover Full Day Care Costs After Guideline Ruled Invalid
Cited in conjunction with § 3 Abs. 1 ZLV to restrict reimbursement to costs not covered by other insurances.
VB.2013.00181 · zh (§ 9 Abs. I ZLG)
Social Assistance for Complementary Medicine Costs
Cited in the list of legal norms, but not explicitly used in the final operative part of this specific excerpt.