Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
831.3 ZLGLPCLPI CH-ZH

Art. 21 : Zusatzleistungsgesetz (ZLG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (53 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 21

1 Die Zusatzleistungen sind von der Gemeinde zu gewähren, Örtliche

in welcher der Gesuchsteller seinen zivilrechtlichen Wohnsitz hat.

2 Der Aufenthalt in einem Heim, einem Spital oder einer anderen

Anstalt und die behördliche Platzierung einer volljährigen Person in

Familienpflege begründen keine neue Zuständigkeit.30

3 22, 26

Zuständigkeit32

1. 1. 24-123

7

831.3 Zusatzleistungsgesetz (ZLG)

Betrag für die

obligatorische

Krankenpflege-

versicherung

a. Aufgaben der

Durchführungs-

stellen

b. Aufgaben der

SVA

Auszahlung

← Art. 20a Zusatzleistungsgesetz (ZLG) Art. 21a →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (22)

ZL.2022.00024 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Claimant v. Local Authority: Center of Life and Jurisdiction Remanded
Cited in the reasoning regarding municipal competence but not in the dispositive orders.
ZL.2019.00099 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 2 ZLG)
Domicile for Supplementary Benefits: Intent and Institutionalization
This provision is cited to explain that the insured person's stay in a care facility does not create a new place of jurisdiction within the canton.
ZL.2015.00134 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Supplementary Benefits Based on Pre-Institutionalization Domicile
Cited in the final order as the legal basis for determining the responsible municipality within the canton for supplementary benefits based on residence.
ZL.2016.00068 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Supplementary Benefit Jurisdiction and Domicile of Care Facility Resident
This cantonal law provision mirrors the federal ELG regarding municipal responsibility for supplementary benefits within the canton, used to establish the jurisdiction of the municipality Y.---.
ZL.2016.00068 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 2 ZLG)
Supplementary Benefit Jurisdiction and Domicile of Care Facility Resident
Used to confirm that the rule exempting stays in institutions from creating new jurisdiction applies also under cantonal law for disputes between municipalities.
ZL.2014.00022 · zh (§ 21 ZLG)
Domicile Determination for Supplementary Benefits Following Clinic Stay
Cited in the reasoning phase concerning the municipal competence within the canton, aligning with federal law.
ZL.2012.00118 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Canton of Zurich Liable for Supplementary Benefits Despite Temporary Apprenticeship
This provision mirrors Art. 21 Abs. 1 ELG for the responsibility of municipalities within the canton and was applied in conjunction with Art. 21 Abs. 1 ELG to determine cantonal responsibility.
ZL.2012.00118 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 2 ZLG)
Canton of Zurich Liable for Supplementary Benefits Despite Temporary Apprenticeship
This provision mirrors Art. 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ELG for the relationship between municipalities and was applied in conjunction with Art. 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ELG.
ZL.2012.00118 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Jurisdictional Determination for Supplementary Benefits Based on Civil Law Domicile in Cases of Temporary Relocation and Care Home Residency
This cantonal provision mirrors the federal law (Art. 21 Abs. 1 ELG) regarding local jurisdiction among municipalities, applied in the final finding.
ZL.2012.00058 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 2 ZLG)
Municipality Responsibility for Supplementary Benefits After Institutionalization
This cantonal provision, mirroring Art. 21 Abs. 1 ELG regarding home stays, serves as the direct legal basis for maintaining the responsibility of the municipality Z. for benefit payments.
ZL.2012.00058 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 ZLG)
Municipality Liability for Institutional Supplementary Benefits Upon Relocation
The court determined the responsible municipality for benefit payments based on this cantonal law provision, which dictates continuity of responsibility when entering a home.
ZL.2010.00082 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Municipality Liability for Disability Benefits Based on Civil Law Domicile After Facility Closure
The appeal was rejected because the court determined that the appellant municipality was responsible for determining and paying supplementary benefits starting April 1, 2010, based on the cantonal law equivalent to the federal standard.
ZL.2010.00082 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 ZLG)
Municipality Liability for Supplementary Benefits Based on Civil Domicile After Institutional Closure
This provision determines the responsibility among municipalities within the canton, which was used alongside Art. 21 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ELG to decide on the competent authority.
ZL.2010.00046 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 des Zürcher Gesetzes über die Zusatzleistungen zur eidgenössischen Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invalidenversicherung (ZLG))
Canton Responsibility for Supplementary Benefits of Care Home Resident
This provision was used to determine that within the Canton of Zurich, the municipality of B.___ is responsible for assessing the application.
ZL.2010.00046 · zh (§ 21 Abs. 1 des Zürcher Gesetzes über die Zusatzleistungen zur eidgenössischen Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invalidenversicherung (ZLG))
Canton Liability for Supplementary Benefits Based on Domicile at Institution Admission
This provision was used to establish that the municipality of B. is responsible for assessing the application within the Canton of Zurich.