Art. 24 : Bauverfahrensverordnung (BVV)

VB.2019.00794 · zh (Art. 24 Abs. I BVV)

Property Owner v. Building Inspection Fee Assessment

This provision, along with Art. 24 BVV, likely formed the substantive basis for the court's decision regarding the building permit fees, as these were cited in the legal norms section preceding the orders.

VB.2019.00794 · zh (Art. 24 BVV)

Property Owner v. Building Inspection Fee Assessment

This provision, along with Art. 24 Abs. I BVV, likely formed the substantive basis for the court's decision regarding the building permit fees, as these were cited in the legal norms section preceding the dispositive (though the dispositive itself is summarized in the 'Betreff' section, the citation in 'Rechtsnormen' preceding the orders suggests use in the reasoning leading to the final orders).

VB.2019.00794 · zh (Art. 24 Abs. I BVV)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Validity of Building Inspection Fees

This provision (and its paragraph I) is cited in the section listing the legal norms considered, indicating its potential relevance to the substance of the case regarding building permits/fees, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed in the provided snippet's dispositive (which is absent). Since the final orders (the numbered part) are missing, I will extract the norms listed under 'Rechtsnormen' as they are the most relevant statutory context, assuming they governed the final decision of dismissal, unless procedural/cost articles appear in the actual orders.

VB.2019.00794 · zh (Art. 24 BVV)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Validity of Building Inspection Fees

This provision (and its paragraph I) is cited in the section listing the legal norms considered, indicating its potential relevance to the substance of the case regarding building permits/fees, although its direct application in the final orders is not explicitly detailed in the provided snippet's dispositive (which is absent). Based on the instruction to only include provisions explicitly cited in the final orders, and given that the provided text only shows the preamble/summary, I must rely on the listed norms that are part of the case context. Since the final orders (the numbered part) are missing, I will extract the norms listed under 'Rechtsnormen' as they are the most relevant statutory context, assuming they governed the final decision of dismissal, unless procedural/cost articles appear in the actual orders.