700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 73 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 73
59 1 Die baurechtliche Bewilligung setzt eine vollständige IV. Siche-
Baueingabe voraus.
2 Mit der baurechtlichen Bewilligung sind Nebenbestimmungen zu
verbinden, die sichern, dass während des Bestands der bewilligten
Überbauung
a. das Areal weder stärker ausgenützt noch wesentlich anders als
nach den bewilligten Plänen überbaut wird,
b.55 die Grünflächen und sonstigen Umgebungsanlagen sowie die Aus-
stattungen und Ausrüstungen dem plangemässen Zweck erhalten
bleiben.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)
BRGE.III.Nr.0269.20 · zh (§ 69 - 73 PBG)
Building Permits: Unity of Permit Principle Violation
These provisions define area developments (Arealüberbauungen) in the context of the relevant cantonal building law.
BRGE.III.Nr.0269.20 · zh (§ 73 Abs. 1 PBG)
Building Permits: Unity of Permit Principle Violation
The court cited this provision to explain the requirement for a complete building application for area developments.
VB.2023.00468 · zh (§ 73 Abs. 1 PBG)
Building Permit Upheld for Multi-Family Housing Development
The court found no apparent violation of the requirement that a building permit presupposes a complete building application under this provision.
BRGE.III.Nrn.0060.0 · zh (§ 73 Abs. 1 PBG)
Residential Development Permit Appeals Dismissed Over Preemption, Infrastructure, and Design Issues
Cited regarding the required visibility of the essential features of surrounding development even in the main approval procedure for area developments.
VB.2022.00651 · zh (§ 73 Abs. I PBG)
Area Development Permit Cancellation Case
Cited as the legal basis for the overall concept of area development which must be preserved.
VB.2022.00651 · zh (§ 73 PBG)
Area Development Permit Cancellation Case
Cited in relation to the area development permit and its implications for the overall concept.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0082.201 · zh (§ 73 Abs. 1 PBG)
Municipal Building Permit Appeal Regarding Shopping Center Expansion and Heritage Compliance
Cited regarding the requirement for environmental design aspects to be apparent in the main approval procedure for area developments.
BRGE.III.Nr.0268.20 · zh (§ 73 Abs. 1 PBG)
Appeal Upheld Against Staged Building Permit for Area Development Violating Unified Application Requirement and Ignoring Orchard Inventory
Cited as the primary reason for annulling the decision due to the lack of a complete building application for the area development.
VB.2012.00379 · zh (§ 73 Abs. I PBG)
Residential Development Permit Upheld Despite Sewage and Access Objections
This provision is listed, indicating its relevance in the overall decision context.
VB.2010.00437 · zh (§ 73 Abs. II PBG)
Denial of Building Permit for Attic Addition Due to Alteration of Development Uniformity
Used as the primary legal basis for rejecting the appeal concerning the construction of an attic storey.
VB.2010.00241 · zh (§ 73 Abs. II lit. a PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Decision and Site Bisection by Road
This provision, concerning the prerequisites for the building permit, is implicitly the basis for upholding the administrative decision regarding the area calculation and suitability for development.
BRKE.I.Nr.0134.2010 · zh (§ 73 Abs. 2 PBG)
Attic Addition Permit Appeal Over Covenant Restriction
Cited as the provision corresponding to Art. 34 Abs. 1 BauO 1963, confirming the intent behind freezing the development under the Revers.
VB.2006.00380 · zh (§ 73 PBG)
Ancillary Provisions Replacement in Comprehensive Development
This provision likely served as the primary legal basis for the court's decision regarding the replacement of previous provisions with a new area development permit (Arealüberbauungsrevers).
VB.2010.00241 · zh (§ 73 Abs. II lit. a PBG)
Appeal on Building Decision Regarding Area Calculation and Road Interruption
This provision appears to be the substantive legal basis underlying the court's decision regarding the appeal outcome.