700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 62 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 62
27 1 Für Bauten und Anlagen, für die Rechte der Grund- eigentümer, für den Rückgriff auf andere Gemeinden und für das Zug- recht der Gemeinden gelten hinsichtlich Inhalt und Verfahren die gleichen Bestimmungen wie bei übergeordneten Freihaltezonen.
2 In der Erholungszone sind nur die den Vorgaben der Richtpla- nung entsprechenden Bauten und Anlagen zulässig; die Gemeinden erlassen die nötigen Bauvorschriften.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (15)
VB.2006.00133 · zh (§ 62 PBG)
Judicial Review of Municipal Zoning for Golf Course Development
Used to assess whether the protection of the agricultural land reserve is maintained and to evaluate the consequences of the land use change.
VB.2006.00133 · zh (§ 62 PBG)
Zoning Appeal Regarding Golf Course Construction Upheld
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms reviewed, related to the substance of the zoning decision.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0134.202 · zh (§ 62 Abs. 2 PBG)
Rezoning for Sports Facility Overturned Due to Scope and Location Violations
Cited regarding the requirement of a regional development plan entry for the designation of recreational zones outside of building zones.
VB.2022.00328 · zh (§ 62 Abs. II PBG)
Municipal Land-Use Revision for Surf Facility Rejected Due to Spatial Planning Conflicts
Cited as a requirement for designating a recreational zone outside the development area based on the regional master plan.
VB.2015.00040 · zh (§ 62 Abs. II PBG)
Refusal of retroactive building permit for noise wall affirmed
The court addressed the competence of the cantonal authority for building permits in the recreation zone outside the settlement area.
VB.2014.00523 · zh (§ 62 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Outside Designated Zones: Jurisdictional Violation and Cost Allocation
Cited in the reasoning concerning the assessment of zone conformity under cantonal law.
VB.2014.00424 · zh (§ 62 Abs. II PBG)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Terrain Alteration Permit Denial in Recreational Zone
Cited as part of the legal norms applied in the context of the confirmed procedure.
BRGE.III.Nr.0033.20 · zh (§ 62 Abs. 2 PBG)
Zoning Revision to Protected Wetland Invalid
Cited regarding the permissibility of constructions and facilities in recreational zones according to the zoning plan and building regulations.
VB.2014.00278 · zh (§ 62 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Exception for Open Space Encroachment and Jurisdictional Dispute
Cited in relation to the jurisdiction for granting the exception permit, although the final order's reasoning confirmed the Baudirektion's competence in this specific case.
VB.2013.00504 · zh (§ 62 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Slope Reinforcement in Protected Zone Remanded for Expert Opinion
This provision is cited, likely governing the general conditions or review process for the building permit.
VB.2005.00244 · zh (§ 62 PBG)
Building Permit Modification in Recreational Zone Upheld
This provision, concerning the recreation zone, is related to the analysis of zone conformity for the project change.
VB.2001.00048 · zh (§ 62 Abs. II PBG)
Appeal Against Recreational Zone Designation with Limited Residential Use for Equestrian Stable
This provision, cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, is likely the basis for the substantive ruling regarding the planning decision, although the dispositive itself is not fully provided, the cited norms relate to the decision itself.
VB.2013.00504 · zh (§ 62 Abs. I PBG)
Slope Stabilization Structure Permit Appeal
Used to determine the legal basis for granting exceptions for construction projects in non-building zones.
VB.2014.00278 · zh (§ 62 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Balcony Encroachment on Protected Zone
This provision appears to relate to the substantive ruling on the building permit, although the full text of the dispositive is missing to confirm its direct role in the final order, it is listed among the cited norms.
VB.2014.00523 · zh (§ 62 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Outside Designated Zones and Jurisdictional Error
Cited as relevant cantonal law, likely for comparison or context, but not the main ground for the final order regarding jurisdiction.