700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 43 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 43
1 Das Heimschlagsrecht ist innert zehn Jahren seit Eintritt
der Rechtskraft der Freihaltezone schriftlich geltend zu machen.
2 Kommt innert sechs Monaten seit Geltendmachung kein privat-
rechtlicher Vertrag über den Erwerb der Heimschlagsfläche durch das
Gemeinwesen zustande, hat dieses das Schätzungsverfahren nach dem
Gesetz betreffend die Abtretung von Privatrechten einzuleiten.
3 Rechtskräftige Entscheide der Schätzungskommission gelten als
richterliches Urteil.
4 Auf den Heimschlag kann innert zwei Monaten nach Eintritt der
Rechtskraft des Entscheids über die Heimschlagsentschädigung schrift-
lich verzichtet werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (29)
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. I RPV)
Planning Appeal: Non-Conforming Use Conversion Standing and Precedent
The court cited this specific paragraph when ruling that the expansion and change of purpose are independent measures under the final decision.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Planning Appeal: Non-Conforming Use Conversion Standing and Precedent
The court applied this article, along with Art. 37a RPG, in determining the conditions for the change of use in its final orders.
VB.2003.00416 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Permit for Complete Conversion of Structure Outside Building Zone
The court referred to Art. 43 RPV when interpreting the requirements of Art. 37a RPG restrictively.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. I RPV)
Non-Owner Standing to Appeal Land Use Change; Prior Expansion No Bar to Residential Conversion
This specific paragraph was cited in relation to extension and change of use being independent measures.
VB.2004.00314 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Non-Owner Standing to Appeal Land Use Change; Prior Expansion No Bar to Residential Conversion
The court applied this provision regarding the requirements for extension and change of use, which must be met for the Umnutzung under Art. 37a RPG.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0118.201 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. 1 lit. a RPV)
Cantonal Building Directorate v. Land-Use Permit for Parking Spaces
The court leaves open whether the requirements for extension under this article, concerning lawful creation, apply to the commercial use.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0147.201 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. 1 lit. b und c RPV)
Recycling Plant Approval Overturned Due to Amphibian Habitat Concerns
The court found that the zoning authority wrongly concluded that the reuse was compatible with nature conservation regulations and thus permissible under these provisions.
VB.2012.00297 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Administrative Court Overturns Retroactive Permit for Summit Restaurant Expansion
This provision is listed among the legal norms applied or considered relevant to the case.
BRGE.II.Nr.0048.201 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. 1 RPV)
Hotel Outdoor Dining Permit Appeal
Used to assess the conditions for granting an exception permit for commercial buildings and facilities, specifically regarding lawful construction or modification.
BRGE.II.Nr.0048.201 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. 2 und 3 RPV)
Hotel Outdoor Dining Permit Appeal
Used to determine the suitability of the size of the garden restaurant and lounge, considering that open terrace areas are not counted towards the expandable area.
VB.2011.00134 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. II RPV)
Appeal Dismissal in Zoning Dispute Over Agricultural Land Development
This specific subsection of the Ordinance on Spatial Planning was considered in the final decision to reject the appeals regarding moderate or minor expansions.
VB.2011.00134 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Appeal Dismissal in Zoning Dispute Over Agricultural Land Development
This provision of the Ordinance on Spatial Planning was considered in the final decision to reject the appeals, specifically regarding minor expansions in agricultural zones.
BRGE.I.Nr.0195.2011 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Reconstruction of Demolished Workshop Hall Permissible Subject to Conditions
Cited in conjunction with Art. 37a RPG as the basis for refusing the reconstruction.
VB.2010.00039 · zh (Art. 43 Abs. II RPV)
Hotel Expansion Permit Denial Appeal Dismissed
The court addressed whether the construction fell under the permissible expansion measure of this paragraph.
VB.2010.00039 · zh (Art. 43 RPV)
Hotel Expansion Permit Denial Appeal Dismissed
The court addressed whether the construction fell under the permissible expansion measure of this article.