Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
700.1 PBGLATC CH-ZH

Art. 335 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (371 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 335

44 1 Das Baurekursgericht trifft seinen Entscheid in Dreier- IV. Besetzung

besetzung.

2 Der Einzelrichter entscheidet

a. über Rekurse, die offensichtlich unzulässig, zurückgezogen oder

sonstwie gegenstandslos geworden sind,

b. in Fällen, in denen der Streitwert Fr. 20000 nicht übersteigt.

3 In Fällen von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung kann die Sache einer

Dreierbesetzung zum Entscheid unterbreitet werden.

← Art. 334a Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG) Art. 336 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

BRGE.III.Nrn.0108.0 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 1 lit. a des Planungs- und Baugesetzes (PBG) in Verbindung mit § 28a Abs. 1 lit. b des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG))
Appeals Against Zoning Plan Premature Until Final Approval
Allows the single judge to decide with a summary justification because the appeals are clearly not to be considered.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0048.202 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. b PBG)
Heating Oil Spill Cleanup Cost Allocation: Negligent Delivery Employee vs. Property Owner Fault
The rule determining that the single judge decides the appeal because the amount in dispute does not exceed CHF 20,000.
BRGE.II.Nr.0004.202 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 PBG)
Appealability of Inclusion in Cultural Heritage Inventory
This provision was cited to justify the issuance of a single-judge decision due to the obvious inadmissibility of the appeal.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0142.201 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. b des Planungs- und Baugesetzes [PBG])
Cantonal Building Insurance Reimbursement for Environmental Contamination from Slug Pellet Deposition
Determined that the Single Judge has jurisdiction to decide the appeal because the disputed value does not exceed Fr. 20,000.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0016.201 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. a PBG)
Dispute Over Private Road Renovation Cost Settlement and Admissibility of Electronic Submission
Cited in conjunction with § 28a Abs. 1 lit. b VRG for issuing a summarily reasoned single judge decision due to the obvious inadmissibility of the appeal.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0212.201 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. b des Planungs- und Baugesetzes [PBG])
Construction Supervisor Liable for Hazardous Discharge Cost Share
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the single judge to decide because the disputed value did not exceed Fr. 20'000.
BRGE.II.Nr.0126.201 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. a und b sowie Abs. 3 des Planungs- und Baugesetzes (PBG))
Property Owners v. Water Supply Cooperative (Invoice as Appealable Order)
The single judge ruled on the appeal because the value in dispute was low, the appeal was clearly inadmissible, and it was not a matter of fundamental importance.
BRGE.I.Nr.0150.2015 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. b PBG)
Billing Dispute for Multi-Family House Construction
Cited to justify the individual judge's decision on the appeal based on the dispute value.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0072.201 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. b PBG)
Cantonal Insurance Cost Recovery for Unnecessary CBRN Incident Response
Used to establish that the single judge has jurisdiction because the dispute value does not exceed CHF 20,000.
VB.2012.00179 · zh (§ 335 Abs. II lit. a PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Timely Request Service
Referenced in the context of the court's decision.
BRGE.I.Nr.0044.2012 · zh (§ 335 Abs. 2 lit. a PBG)
Late Appeal of Construction Permit Denied Due to Untimeliness
Cited as the basis for the court to render a decision with summary reasoning due to the obvious inadmissibility of the appeal.
VB.2012.00179 · zh (§ 335 Abs. II lit. a PBG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Request for Service of Building Permit Decision
This provision is listed among the cited legal norms, likely related to the substance of the appeal being dismissed.