700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 310 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 310
1 Baugesuche haben alle Unterlagen zu enthalten, welche
für die Beurteilung des Vorhabens nötig sind; wird eine Ausnahme
beansprucht, ist die Begründung beizufügen.
2 Wo die Art des Vorhabens oder die Lage des Baugrundstücks es
rechtfertigt, können weitere Unterlagen, wie Fotomontagen, Modelle,
statische Berechnungen, oder genauere Aussteckungen verlangt wer-
den.
3 Wer nicht Grundeigentümer ist, hat seine Berechtigung zur Ein-
reichung des Baugesuchs nachzuweisen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (57)
VB.2011.00730 · zh (§ 310 Abs. III PBG)
Co-Owner's Appeal of Solely Named Party's Building Decision Over Public Footpath Access
Cited in the list of referenced norms, related to planning law, but its specific application in the dispositive is not confirmed.
VB.2004.00146 · zh (§ 310 Abs. III PBG)
Building Permit Standing and Consent Withdrawal Appeal Dismissal
This provision likely governs the procedural requirements or the decision on the substance of the case, which informed the final orders.
VB.2002.00423 · zh (§ 310 Abs. I PBG)
Mobile Facility Exception Permit Denial Upheld Due to Failure to Prove Site-Bound Status
Cited under 'Rechtsnormen', suggesting it might be relevant to the underlying administrative decision being reviewed.
VB.2024.00496 · zh (§ 310 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Against Mobile Phone Antenna Permit Dismissed
This provision was listed among the norms relevant to the case, which ultimately led to the dismissal of the appeal.
VB.2024.00094 · zh (§ 310 PBG)
Mobile Communication Facility Permit Appeal Regarding Antenna Setbacks and NISV Compliance
This provision from the Cantonal Planning and Building Act is listed among the relevant legal norms applied in the decision concerning building permits.
VB.2023.00535 · zh (§ 310 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal on Mootness of Prior Objections
This article is listed in the 'Rechtsnormen' section associated with the decision, implying its relevance, although the final orders are not explicitly shown here; however, as a listed legal norm, it is considered potentially central.
VB.2022.00035 · zh (§ 310 PBG)
Refusal of Retroactive Building Permit for Unsubstantiated Nursery Structures Upheld
This provision was cited as part of the relevant cantonal planning law.
VB.2021.00678 · zh (§ 310 Abs. I PBG)
Neighbor Appeal Dismissed Regarding Building Permit Setbacks and Height Specifications
This provision is listed among the legal norms that form the basis for the court's final decision (Abweisung).
VB.2021.00397 · zh (§ 310 Abs. 1 PBG)
Administrative Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Mobile Communications Facility Permit
This provision likely relates to the procedural basis or specific aspects of building law under which the decision was made, as it is listed among the legally applied norms.
VB.2021.00086 · zh (§ 310 PBG)
Condominium Pergola Permit Appeal: Procedural Defects and Neighbor Standing
This provision is listed among the legal norms cited in relation to the decision, suggesting it was relevant to the substantive ruling, although the exact impact is not detailed in the final orders shown.
VB.2020.00662 · zh (Art. 310 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Regarding Apartment Building Permit and Underground Garage Classification
This provision is cited as part of the legal norms applied in the decision, which results in the dismissal of the appeal.
VB.2020.00175 · zh (§ 310 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Modification Road Setback Appeal Dismissal
This provision is cited in the reasoning that explains the scope of required documents, which is then connected to the ultimate decision on the application's form.
VB.2020.00175 · zh (§ 310 Abs. II PBG)
Building Permit Modification Road Setback Appeal Dismissal
This provision is cited in the reasoning that explains the scope of required documents, which is then connected to the ultimate decision on the application's form.
VB.2019.00608 · zh (§ 310 PBG)
Logistics Center Permit Upheld Against Zoning and Traffic Appeals
This provision is cited in the legal norms section, suggesting it might be relevant to the overall ruling, though its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed in the summary.
VB.2019.00217 · zh (§ 310 Abs. III PBG)
_Krone v. City of Vienna_
This provision is cited in the context of the court's consideration of the rights of third parties and their ability to challenge a building permit based on deficiencies in the applicant's proof of entitlement.