Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
700.1 PBGLATC CH-ZH

Art. 3 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (371 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 3

1 Der Ausdruck «dieses Gesetz» und die Verweisung auf die Begriffs-

«Vorschriften dieses Gesetzes» umfassen auch die ausführenden bestimmungen

Erlasse.

2 Zu den ausführenden Erlassen zählen die Verordnungen und die

kommunalen Erlasse.

3 Als ausführende Verfügungen gelten alle andern Gesetzesanwen-

dungen.

4 58

1. 1. 25-127

1

700.1

Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG)

Zinssatz

← Art. 2 Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG) Art. 4 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)

BRGE.IV.Nr.0134.202 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Rezoning for Sports Facility Overturned Due to Scope and Location Violations
Cited as requiring a comprehensive balancing of all private and public interests when cultivable land is used for non-agricultural purposes.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0100.010 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Appeal Against Residential Complex Permit Design and Tree Preservation
This article, concerning the required balancing of interests when exercising discretionary powers, was discussed in relation to the ISOS appeal, although ultimately the specific balancing by the ARE was deemed unnecessary for the required appeal review.
VB.2023.00035 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended
This provision was used by the court in its evaluation of spatial planning principles.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0017.202 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. 1 RPV)
Cantonal Watercourse Protection Zone Appeal Regarding Riverbed Width and Harmonization
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of the duty to conduct an interest assessment, relevant to the dismissal of the main claim.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0172.017 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Cantonal Land Use Plan Invalidated Due to Master Plan Inconsistency in Cable Car Project Appeals
The operative decision (order 9) annuls the zoning plan because the appeals concerning it were found to be founded, partly based on the requirements of Art. 3 RPV regarding the required interests assessment.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0052.005 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
School Expansion Zoning Upheld Despite Residential Concerns
Cited concerning the principle of weighing interests in spatial planning.
VB.2016.00314 · zh (§ 3 Abs. IV PBG)
Municipal Protection Ordinance Upheld Against Vineyard Challenge
Cited in connection with § 211 Abs. II PBG to affirm the competence of the executive authority (Beschwerdegegner) to issue the protection ordinance.
BRKE.II.Nr.0029.200 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Golf Course Recreation Zone Upheld Despite Agricultural Designation
Cited regarding the balancing of interests when spatial planning authorities have discretionary powers.
VB.2016.00314 · zh (§ 3 Abs. IV PBG)
Municipal Ordinance Upholding Meadow Protection Zone Over Vineyard Approval
Cited in conjunction with § 211 Abs. II PBG to affirm the jurisdiction of the executive authority to issue the protection ordinance.
VB.2019.00451 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. I RPV)
Appeal Challenging Development Plan Approval: Procedural Rights, Delegation of Authority, and Substantive Legality
This article is cited, suggesting it was relevant to the substantive ruling regarding the Gestaltungsplan.
VB.2019.00451 · zh (Art. 3 RPV)
Appeal Challenging Development Plan Approval: Procedural Rights, Delegation of Authority, and Substantive Legality
This article is cited, suggesting it was relevant to the substantive ruling regarding the Gestaltungsplan.