700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
Art. 293 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 293
1 Nicht anrechenbare Untergeschosse dürfen höchstens
1,5 m über dem gestalteten Boden in Erscheinung treten.23
2 Von dieser Beschränkung ausgenommen sind Haus- und Keller-
zugänge, Gartenausgänge sowie Ein- und Ausfahrten zu Einzel-, Dop-
pel- oder Sammelgaragen.
3 25
4 Die Bau- und Zonenordnung kann die Freilegung von Unter-
geschossen näher regeln.26
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (27)
VB.2000.00018 · zh (§ 293 Abs. IV PBG)
Excavation Permits and Municipal Authority Over Basement Exposure
This provision is cited in the final orders, likely regarding the scope or application of the municipal regulation on excavations.
VB.2000.00018 · zh (§ 293 Abs. IV PBG)
Excavation Limits in Building Permit Dispute
This provision is cited in the context of the municipal authority to regulate the exposure of basements, which is the basis for the restriction on excavations.
VB.2021.00678 · zh (§ 293 PBG)
Neighbor Appeal Dismissed Regarding Building Permit Setbacks and Height Specifications
This provision is listed among the legal norms that form the basis for the court's final decision (Abweisung).
VB.2020.00668 · zh (§ 293 Abs. 4 PBG)
Municipal Authority on Terrain Modifications and Building Facades
This provision explicitly allows for further regulation of the exposure of basements, which includes rules for excavations and embankments on building facades.
VB.2019.00810 · zh (§ 293 Abs. I PBG)
Municipal Excavation Volume Exceeding Subordinate Nature Limit
Cited in the context of its inapplicability to the municipality's zoning plan which uses a building mass index instead of storey height regulation.
VB.2019.00810 · zh (§ 293 Abs. II PBG)
Municipal Excavation Volume Exceeding Subordinate Nature Limit
Cited in the context of its inapplicability to the municipality's zoning plan which uses a building mass index instead of storey height regulation.
VB.2019.00810 · zh (§ 293 Abs. IV PBG)
Municipal Excavation Volume Exceeding Subordinate Nature Limit
Cited in the context of its inapplicability to the municipality's zoning plan which uses a building mass index instead of storey height regulation.
VB.2017.00037 · zh (§ 293 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Parking Garage Legality and Aesthetic Zoning Compliance Dismissed
This provision is implicitly the ground for the final dismissal of the appeal, as it relates to the substantive requirements concerning building law.
BRGE.II.Nrn.0147.01 · zh (§ 293 PBG)
Municipal Permit Overturned Due to Non-Compliant Basement Visibility and Excessive Earth Fill
Cited in relation to the limitation on the height of non-assessable basements above the developed ground, which the construction project violated without the disputed backfilling.
VB.2013.00815 · zh (§ 293 PBG)
Appeal Dismissed: Building Permit Objections on Notification, Basement Use, and Height Calculation
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms, implying it was relevant to the court's final decision regarding the appeal's outcome (dismissal).
VB.2013.00117 · zh (§ 293 Abs. IV PBG)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Building Permit Due to Excavation and Site Integration Issues
Cited in the dispositive regarding the court's review of the administrative decision.
VB.2012.00012 · zh (§ 293 Abs. 2 PBG)
Building Permit Excavation Scope Appeal
The court relied on this paragraph to assess the justification for the planned excavations in relation to garage access.
VB.2008.00553 · zh (§ 293 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Excavation Exposing Lower Floors
The exceptional permit was found to violate the purpose of the municipal excavation rule found in this provision.
VB.2008.00373 · zh (§ 293 Abs. IV PBG)
Building Permit Rejection Upheld Due to Length Surcharge and Excavation Non-Compliance
This procedural provision was part of the legal framework considered for the final decision to dismiss the appeal.
VB.2007.00309 · zh (§ 293 Abs. IV PBG)
Municipal Permit Regulation Interpretation and Unlawful Practice
This provision concerning area development was the subject of the dispute regarding the interpretation of the municipal excavation rule, leading to the decision.