700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
Art. 292 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 292
55, 59 Wo kein geringeres oder grösseres Mass bestimmt ist, Dachaufbauten
dürfen Dachaufbauten, ausgenommen Kamine, Anlagen zur Nutzung
von Sonnenenergie und kleinere technisch bedingte Aufbauten, insge-
samt nicht breiter als die Hälfte der betreffenden Fassadenlänge sein,
sofern sie
a. bei Schrägdächern über die tatsächliche Dachebene hinausragen,
b. bei Flachdächern das vorgeschriebene Mass der Rückversetzungen
unterschreiten.
1. 1. 25-127
67
700.1
Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG)
Untergeschosse
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (123)
BRGE.III.Nr.0009.20 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Pergola as Roof Extension Dispute
The provision is applied to determine whether the pergola constitutes a roof extension and must be accounted for within the permissible third of the facade length.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0029.201 · zh (§ 292 lit. b PBG)
Building Permit Revoked for Violating Facade Length Regulations on Attic Floor
This provision was used to define the limits for roof structures on flat roofs, which was relevant in assessing the excess width of the attic storey.
VB.2010.00469 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal for Mobile Radio Antenna Installation Height Violation
Cited in the context of assessing whether technical cabinets can be qualified as minor technically necessitated roof structures under this provision.
VB.2007.00005 · zh (§ 292 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Against Denial of Building Permit for Antenna Installation on Illegally Constructed Building
This provision is listed as a cited legal norm relevant to the case's subject matter.
VB.2006.00150 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Attic Balcony Violating Setback Regulations
The court used this provision to establish that attic floors should be recognizably structured as such and not convey the impression of a full floor.
VB.2006.00107 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit, Project Modification, and Planning Defect in Lift Crossing
The court used this provision to evaluate the requirements for the projected lift crossing.
BRKE.I.Nr.0198.2003 · zh (§ 292 lit. b PBG)
Height Profile Calculation for Attic Story on Flat Roof
This provision governs roof structures on flat roofs and was used to determine the allowable extent of attic structures.
BRKE.I.Nr.0150.2001 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Attic Story Projection Limits
Cited as the legal basis for regulating roof structures (attic storeys) and determining their permissible extent.
VB.2000.00086 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Building Permit Procedural Defects and Neighbor Standing
The length of the facade, which is crucial for the assessment of the roof extension, is determined by this provision.
VB.2004.00481 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Attic Storey Ridge Line Violation and Cost Allocation in Building Permit Appeal
The court found that the structure of the attic floor contradicted this provision, leading to the acceptance of the appeal.
VB.2010.00469 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial for Mobile Antenna Height Due to Technical Cabinet
Cited in relation to the definition of smaller technically conditioned roof structures, which the Technikschrank does not qualify as.
VB.2010.00704 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Building Permit Demolition and Reconstruction Appeals Regarding Ground Level, Height, Setbacks, and Roof Design
This provision likely relates to the classification of underground structures, relevant for the ruling on the garage's setback obligation.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0100.010 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Appeal Against Residential Complex Permit Design and Tree Preservation
This provision regarding attic structures was raised in an objection, but the court found the appellants' objections unfounded and did not issue an order based on it.
VB.2024.00260 · zh (§ 292 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Dismissed Over Coordination, Height Calculation, and Zoning Exceptions
The court used this provision to assess the admissibility of terrace structures classified as roof superstructures.
VB.2024.00260 · zh (§ 292 lit. a PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Dismissed Over Coordination, Height Calculation, and Zoning Exceptions
The court used this provision to determine which façade (gable or eaves) the bevelled side of the building should be attributed to for height compliance.