700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 276 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 276
55, 59 1 Als Geschosse zählen Voll-, Dach-, Attika- und Unter-
geschosse mit Wohn-, Schlaf- oder Arbeitsräumen.
64
Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG)
700.1
2 In allen Bauzonen können Vollgeschosse durch Dach-, Attika-
oder Untergeschosse ersetzt werden; zusammengerechnet dürfen sie
jedoch die erlaubte Zahl der Vollgeschosse nicht überschreiten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)
BRGE.III.Nr.0009.20 · zh (§ 276 Abs. 1 PBG)
Pergola as Roof Extension Dispute
This provision is invoked to assess whether the pergola, by not constituting living space, leads to the attic being counted towards the number of stories.
VB.2006.00512 · zh (§ 276 PBG)
Building Permit Alterations and Story Determination for Renovations
Cited in relation to the procedural aspects concerning the determination of the permissible number of storeys.
VB.2002.00413 · zh (§ 276 Abs. I PBG)
Building Story Definition in Zoning Compliance
This provision was cited among the legal norms applied.
VB.2006.00512 · zh (§ 276 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Upward Extension and Conversion of Non-Conforming Structure
This procedural provision is cited in the list of relevant legal norms and likely forms the basis for the decision to remit the case (E. 4 suggests a procedural remedy).
VB.2010.00577 · zh (§ 276 Abs. II PBG)
Building Permit, Basement Definition, and Planning Unity Appeal
This provision is listed among the norms cited in the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed in the summary.
VB.2023.00208 · zh (§ 276 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Remanded Over Design Conformity Standard in Protected Area
This provision was cited among the relevant legal norms.
VB.2020.00737 · zh (§ 276 Abs. I PBG)
Apartment Rooftop Extension Permit Upheld Despite Neighbor Objections
This provision was used to assess the interests of neighbors in relation to building in the boundary distance area.
VB.2017.00491 · zh (§ 276 Abs. 1 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal: Basement Classification and Roof Structure
Cited among the legal norms relevant to the case context.
VB.2013.00815 · zh (§ 276 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Dismissed: Building Permit Objections on Notification, Basement Use, and Height Calculation
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms, implying it was relevant to the court's final decision regarding the appeal's outcome (dismissal).
VB.2013.00117 · zh (§ 276 Abs. II PBG)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Building Permit Due to Excavation and Site Integration Issues
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for the court's decision regarding the retaining wall's compliance with aesthetic requirements.
VB.2012.00165 · zh (§ 276 Abs. II PBG)
Administrative Court Upholds Two-Story Building Permit Despite Ambiguous Height Ordinance
Cited in the reasoning regarding the calculation of full storeys replaced by attics or basement storeys.
VB.2011.00389 · zh (§ 276 Abs. 1 PBG)
Rooftop Storage Space Not Counted as Usable Floor Area
This provision is cited as the basis for determining the calculable floor space of a top-floor apartment, specifically concerning a roof terrace.
BRGE.II.Nr.0113.201 · zh (§ 276 Abs. 1 PBG)
Rooftop Terrace as Countable Attic Story Zoning Dispute
Cited in the reasoning as the provision determining when attic floors count towards the floor count, requiring living, sleeping, or working spaces.
VB.2010.00577 · zh (§ 276 Abs. II PBG)
Property De-listing, Basement Classification, and Traffic Safety Decision Timing Dispute
Cited as a legal norm, but its application in the final orders is unconfirmed without the dispositive section.
VB.2010.00360 · zh (§ 276 PBG)
Building Permit Ground Level Determination Based on Original Application Filing Conditions
This provision, along with others, appears to govern the substantive subject matter (building law) that formed the basis of the confirmed jurisprudence.