700.1 PBGLATC

CH-ZH

Art. 275 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (371 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 275

55, 59 1 Vollgeschosse sind alle Geschosse von Gebäuden aus-

ser Unter-, Dach- und Attikageschosse. Bei zusammengebauten Gebäu-

den und bei Gebäuden, die in der Höhe oder in der Situation gestaffelt

sind, wird die Vollgeschosszahl für jeden Gebäudeteil bzw. für jedes

Gebäude separat ermittelt.

2 Dachgeschosse sind Geschosse mit einer Kniestockhöhe bis 1,5 m.

3 Untergeschosse sind Geschosse, bei denen die Oberkante des

fertigen Bodens des darüber liegenden Geschosses, gemessen in der

Fassadenflucht, im Mittel höchstens um 2,5 m über die Fassadenlinie

hinausragt, an keiner Stelle aber mehr als 3 m.

4 Attikageschosse sind auf Flachdächern aufgesetzte, zusätzliche

Geschosse. Das Attikageschoss muss bei den fiktiven Traufseiten ge-

genüber dem darunter liegenden Geschoss um das halbe Mass seiner

Höhe zurückversetzt sein.

5 Die Kniestockhöhe ist der Höhenunterschied zwischen der Ober-

kante des Dachgeschossbodens im Rohbau und der Schnittlinie der

Fassadenflucht mit der Oberkante der Dachkonstruktion.

← Art. 274 Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG) Art. 276 →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (67)

BRGE.IV.Nr.0029.201 · zh (§ 275 Abs. 2 PBG)

Building Permit Revoked for Violating Facade Length Regulations on Attic Floor

The court cited this provision to define attic storeys and establish that the attic storey in question no longer qualified as such due to exceeding permissible limits.

VB.2005.00484 · zh (§ 275 Abs. II PBG)

Municipality v. Unauthorized Attic Construction Over Knee Wall Height

The court affirmed the lower court's finding that the storey in question qualified as an unauthorized full storey, not a roof storey, based on this provision defining storey height requirements.

VB.2002.00413 · zh (§ 275 Abs. I PBG)

Building Story Definition in Zoning Compliance

This provision was cited among the legal norms applied.

VB.2000.00018 · zh (§ 275 Abs. III PBG)

Excavation Permits and Municipal Authority Over Basement Exposure

This provision is cited in the final orders and pertains to the authority of municipalities to regulate the exposure of basements, which is the subject of the dispute.

VB.2000.00018 · zh (§ 275 Abs. III PBG)

Excavation Limits in Building Permit Dispute

This provision is cited in the context of the municipal authority to regulate the exposure of basements, which is the basis for the restriction on excavations.

VB.2003.00196 · zh (§ 275 Abs. II PBG)

Municipality Standing to Challenge Building Permit Violations

Cited in the context of the background legal framework, but not explicitly in the final orders (as per rule: check dispositive).

VB.2010.00577 · zh (§ 275 Abs. III PBG)

Building Permit, Basement Definition, and Planning Unity Appeal

This provision is listed among the norms cited in the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed in the summary.

VB.2010.00704 · zh (§ 275 PBG)

Building Permit Demolition and Reconstruction Appeals Regarding Ground Level, Height, Setbacks, and Roof Design

This provision likely relates to the determination of building height or other dimensional aspects that were central to the dispute.

VB.2023.00208 · zh (§ 275 PBG)

Building Permit Appeal Remanded Over Design Conformity Standard in Protected Area

This provision was cited among the relevant legal norms.

VB.2023.00012 · zh (§ 275 Abs. II PBG)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Apartment Building with Attic

This provision is listed in the cited norms and relates to the main subject of the decision concerning the building permit, which was ultimately dismissed.

BRGE.III.Nr.0116.20 · zh (§ 275 Abs. 4 PBG)

Municipality Appeal on Zoning Setback and Wall Height Regulations Dismissed

Cited in conjunction with § 45 Abs. 2 PBG as the cantonal definition of attic stories that Art. 44 BZO contradicted.

VB.2022.00508 · zh (§ 275 Abs. I PBG)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Attic Story Classification

This provision appears to be the core legal basis for classifying the upper floor, although the dispositive only explicitly confirms the court's finding regarding it, rather than using it as the sole ground for dismissal.

VB.2022.00508 · zh (§ 275 Abs. II PBG)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Attic Story Classification

This provision relates to the classification of the upper floor, which the court confirmed was correctly deemed an attic storey.

VB.2021.00776 · zh (§ 275 Abs. III PBG)

Zoning Ordinance on Basement Use Upheld

Cited in relation to the procedural aspects of the building permit process.

VB.2022.00176 · zh (§ 275 Abs. II PBG)

Appeal Regarding Hypothetical Ridge Line Determination for Polygonal Flat-Roofed Building

This provision is explicitly cited in the section listing the legal norms that served as the basis for the final decision (dismissal).

Art. 275 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)

Art. 275

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (67)