700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 265 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 265
1 Fehlen Baulinien für öffentliche und private Strassen und
Plätze sowie für öffentliche Wege und erscheint eine Festsetzung nicht
nötig, so haben oberirdische Gebäude einen Abstand von 6 m gegen-
über Strassen und Plätzen und von 3,5 m gegenüber Wegen einzuhal-
ten, sofern die Bau- und Zonenordnung keine anderen Abstände vor-
schreibt.27
2.25
3 Über den Abstand von Mauern, Einfriedigungen und Pflanzen
erlässt der Regierungsrat Vorschriften. In den Städten Zürich und
Winterthur liegt diese Zuständigkeit bei den Gemeinden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (96)
VB.2007.00049 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Neighbor Standing and Setback Distances for High-Rise Development
Cited in the factual summary as governing the minimum distance of buildings from streets and squares when no building lines are established.
VB.2004.00252 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Administrative Court Upholds Building Permit Denial Based on Setback Evasion in Remodeling
This provision was implicitly applied as the basis for judging the entire building project according to new construction regulations.
VB.2004.00169 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permits: Footpath Relocation Exceeds Municipal Authority
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement that the path must maintain a minimum distance of 3.5 m from the east facade according to this provision.
VB.2001.00092 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Appeal: Setbacks, Utilization Transfer, and Excavation Permissibility
This provision likely served as the main ground for partially granting the appeal regarding the building permit, specifically concerning the setback distance over the public path, which is mentioned in the decision's subject summary.
VB.2003.00006 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Building Commission's Authority Over Municipal Aesthetic Discretion in Site Development
Cited in the reasoning section, implicitly related to the outcome of the appeal.
VB.2004.00169 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Administrative Court Upholds Appeal on Building Permits Over Footpath Relocation Conflict with Development Plan
Cited as part of the reasoning concerning the required minimum distance of the path from the east facade.
VB.2012.00810 · zh (§ 265 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Rejection and Road Setback Extension
It is cited in relation to the application of case law concerning the extended guarantee of vested rights in the road setback area.
BRGE.II.Nr.0165.202 · zh (§ 265 Abs. 1 PBG)
Kindergarten Extension Permit Revoked Due to Improper Setback Exception
Cited to establish the general rule for building setbacks from streets and paths.
VB.2023.00606 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Asylum Accommodation Zoning Compliance and Building Permit Granted
This provision is cited as the legal basis for granting a building permit if the construction project complies with all relevant regulations.
VB.2022.00389 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Upheld: Path Setback Governs, Overruling Neighboring Property Distance Requirements
The court confirmed that the new buildings must maintain a 3.5 m distance from the public path as required by this provision due to the lack of a building line.
VB.2022.00725 · zh (§ 265 Abs. 1 PBG)
Building Permit Setback Determination: Street vs. Path Classification
This provision defines the required distance from roads and paths, which formed the main legal basis for judging the appeal regarding the building setback.
VB.2022.00726 · zh (§ 265 Abs. 1 PBG)
Construction Permit Appeal: Road vs. Way Setback Classification
This provision establishes the required setback distance (6 m from streets/squares, 3.5 m from paths) when no specific distances are prescribed in the zoning ordinance, which was the basis for the final ruling on the setback.
VB.2022.00480 · zh (§ 265 Abs. 1 PBG)
Zoning Setback Dispute: Road vs. Path Classification
This provision concerning setback distances (6m from streets and 3.5m from paths) was the substantive legal basis explicitly cited in the reasoning leading to the final decision to reject the appeal.
VB.2022.00480 · zh (§ 265 PBG)
Zoning Setback Dispute: Road vs. Path Classification
This general article was cited alongside its specific paragraph in the context of the substantive decision regarding setback distances.
VB.2022.00214 · zh (§ 265 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Application: Road vs. Path Distinction and Attic Story Extension
This provision is cited in the dispositive regarding the required distance from a street, and the court determined that the projected balcony violated this distance.