700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 259 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 259
55, 59 1 Zur anrechenbaren Grundstücksfläche gehören die E. Anrechen-
in der entsprechenden Bauzone liegenden Grundstücksflächen bzw. bare Grund-
Grundstücksteile.
2 Die Flächen der Hauszufahrten werden angerechnet. Nicht ange-
rechnet werden die Flächen der Grund-, Grob- und Feinerschliessung.
stücksfläche
III. Die Abstände
1. Gemeinsame Bestimmung
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (50)
VB.2006.00322 · zh (§ 259 Abs. I PBG)
Demolition Order Upheld Due to Invalid Intra-Zonal Utilization Transfer Over Extensive Distance
This provision is cited, indicating its application in relation to the breach of building regulations concerning use density or distances.
VB.2006.00107 · zh (§ 259 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit, Project Modification, and Planning Defect in Lift Crossing
This provision was cited in relation to the overall legal framework governing the planning.
VB.2000.00305 · zh (§ 259 PBG)
Building Permit Calculation: Plot Area Deduction for Rights of Way
This provision was used to determine the calculation basis for the utilization index, specifically regarding the deduction of areas burdened by rights-of-way.
VB.2000.00305 · zh (§ 259 PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Calculation of Permissible Building Utilization
This provision governed the calculation of the exploitable area, specifically regarding the exclusion of land encumbered by rights of way and access roads.
VB.2006.00215 · zh (§ 259 Abs. 1 PBG)
Railway Tracks Development Area Dispute
Cited as the provision defining the assessable area, against which the exclusion of the railway land was determined.
VB.2006.00327 · zh (§ 259 Abs. I PBG)
Building Permit Appeal Over Length Violation on Concession Land
This provision is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, related to planning law principles.
VB.2010.00574 · zh (§ 259 Abs. I PBG)
Zoning Regulation Upheld on Transfer of Building Utilization Quotas Between Adjacent Plots
This provision is cited in the procedural notes, indicating it is relevant to the legal basis of the decision, specifically regarding the assessment of development right transfer.
VB.2010.00574 · zh (§ 259 PBG)
Zoning Regulation Upheld on Transfer of Building Utilization Quotas Between Adjacent Plots
This provision is cited in the procedural notes, indicating it is relevant to the legal basis of the decision, although the dispositive itself is not fully visible, the context implies it relates to the assessment of municipal regulations regarding development rights transfer.
VB.2023.00299 · zh (§ 259 Abs. 1 PBG)
Property Owner v. Authority Regarding Usage Reservation Reduction
This provision is cited among the legal norms applied in the context of the appeal concerning the adjustment of the building volume revers.
VB.2022.00458 · zh (§ 259 Abs. II PBG)
Property Owner Challenge to Traffic Building Lines Upheld
This provision was implicitly applied regarding the general nature of the planning approval process upheld by the court.
VB.2022.00514 · zh (§ 259 Abs. II PBG)
Building Permit for Replacement House in Water Protection Zone Upheld
Governs building permits and the principle of material coordination.
VB.2023.00063 · zh (§ 259 Abs. 1 PBG)
Administrative Court Approves Exception to Inter-Zonal FAR Transfer Based on Special Circumstances
This provision concerning internal utilization transfer was considered in relation to the granting of the exception under § 220 PBG.
BRGE.I.Nr.0059.2020 · zh (§ 259 Abs. 1 PBG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Based on Impermissible Utilization Transfer and Lack of Harmonious Integration
Cited when discussing the definition of the relevant land area for utilization index calculations.
VB.2019.00663 · zh (§ 259 PBG)
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Regulations and Zoning Compliance
The decision implicitly addresses the application of this provision concerning building regulations, which the court found the municipality was not competent to deviate from.
VB.2019.00740 · zh (§ 259 PBG)
Zoning Appeal: Preliminary Questions, Ground Area Calculation, and Setback Exception
The court used this provision to rule on whether certain traffic areas are part of the assessable area.