Art. 256 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)

BRGE.I.Nrn.0159.016 · zh (§ 256 Abs. 1 PBG)

Covered Parking Structures Deemed Separate Buildings for Coverage Ratio Purposes

This provision was applied to determine the extent to which the covered parking spaces are to be counted towards the building density limit, based on the vertical projection of the largest above-ground building enclosure.

BRGE.I.Nrn.0159.016 · zh (§ 256 Abs. 2 PBG)

Covered Parking Structures Deemed Separate Buildings for Coverage Ratio Purposes

This provision was used to determine whether the covered parking spaces should be considered mere projections and thus privileged in their calculation towards the building density limit.

VB.2024.00326 · zh (§ 256 Abs. I PBG)

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Utilization Transfer Requirements

This provision, along with § 321 PBG, is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section and relates to the substance of the decision (exclusion of advance utilization transfer), which underpins the final order.

VB.2022.00643 · zh (§ 256 PBG)

Appeal Against Building Permit Deviation Upheld Due to Impermissible Remediation Condition

This procedural provision was cited in connection with the court's reasoning regarding the modification of the building permit.

VB.2017.00100 · zh (§ 256 Abs. I PBG)

Building Permit Calculation Dispute: Balconies, Facade Recesses, and Ridge Orientation

Cited in the list of legal norms examined in the case context.

VB.2017.00100 · zh (§ 256 Abs. II PBG)

Building Permit Calculation Dispute: Balconies, Facade Recesses, and Ridge Orientation

Used in the reasoning to explain why balconies up to 2m deep are excluded from calculating the building footprint, which underpins the final decision regarding the building volume index.

VB.2013.00598 · zh (§ 256 Abs. I PBG)

Appeal Against Building Permit Calculation and Balcony Permissibility Dismissed

This provision regarding the calculation of the building perimeter (Überbauungsziffer) was discussed and applied in the reasoning leading to the final decision, although the ruling itself does not explicitly cite it in the dispositive section provided in the prompt context (which is usually inferred from the overall judgment outcome, but based strictly on the rule, only explicit citations in the final orders count).

VB.2005.00104 · zh (§ 256 Abs. I PBG)

Building Permit Mass Quota Calculation Appeal

Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedural context of the decision.

VB.2013.00598 · zh (§ 256 Abs. I PBG)

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Floor Area Ratio and Balcony Overhangs

The interpretation of the term 'greatest superficial building enclosure' as used in this provision was central to the decision regarding the building envelope calculation.

VB.2017.00100 · zh (§ 256 Abs. I PBG)

Administrative Appeal on Building Permit: Building Coverage Ratio and Roof Ridge Orientation

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, indicating its relevance to the court's decision-making process, although the full dispositive text is not provided to confirm its explicit application in the numbered orders.

VB.2017.00100 · zh (§ 256 Abs. II PBG)

Administrative Appeal on Building Permit: Building Coverage Ratio and Roof Ridge Orientation

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, indicating its relevance to the court's decision-making process, although the full dispositive text is not provided to confirm its explicit application in the numbered orders.