700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 238 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 238
1 Bauten, Anlagen und Umschwung sind für sich und in
ihrem Zusammenhang mit der baulichen und landschaftlichen Um-
gebung im ganzen und in ihren einzelnen Teilen so zu gestalten, dass
eine befriedigende Gesamtwirkung erreicht wird; diese Anforderung
gilt auch für Materialien und Farben.
2 Auf Objekte des Natur- und Heimatschutzes ist besondere Rück-
sicht zu nehmen; sie dürfen auch durch Nutzungsänderungen und Un-
terhaltsarbeiten nicht beeinträchtigt werden, für die keine baurecht-
liche Bewilligung nötig ist.
3...71
4 Genügend angepasste energetische Verbesserungen und Anlagen
zur Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien, insbesondere Solaranlagen, wer-
den bewilligt, sofern nicht überwiegende öffentliche Interessen entge-
genstehen.65
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (833)
BRGE.I.Nr.0041.2015 · zh (§ 238 Abs. 1 PBG)
Ventilation Permit Denial Overturned Due to Technical Necessity
Forms the basis for the requirement that buildings, installations, and their surroundings must be designed to achieve a satisfactory overall effect, both individually and in relation to their context.
BRGE.I.Nr.0041.2015 · zh (§ 238 Abs. 2 PBG)
Ventilation Permit Denial Overturned Due to Technical Necessity
Used to justify that particular consideration must be given to objects of nature and heritage protection, leading to a higher standard than merely satisfactory overall impact.
VB.2010.00431 · zh (§ 238 Abs. 1 PBG)
Building Permit Challenge: Cellular Station Near Protected Viewpoint
The decision states that the mobile radio antenna only has to comply with the general aesthetic clause cited here.
VB.2010.00431 · zh (§ 238 Abs. 2 PBG)
Building Permit Challenge: Cellular Station Near Protected Viewpoint
This provision was cited in connection with § 203 Abs. 1 lit. b PBG regarding the classification requirements, which the court ultimately deemed not applicable in the final orders.
VB.2009.00321 · zh (§ 238 Abs. I PBG)
Property Owner Billboard Permit Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Substantive Validity
This provision was cited among the legal norms.
VB.2007.00092 · zh (§ 238 Abs. I PBG)
Property Owner Challenge to Building Permit in Preservation Zone
This provision sets the general design standards applicable in the zone, as determined by the court in its reasoning regarding satisfactory overall impact.
VB.2006.00496 · zh (§ 238 PBG)
Cantonal Building Directorate Deference to Municipal Autonomy in Development Plan Approval
This provision was mentioned in connection with the requirement for classifying a future project, which was addressed in the final decision (E. 8.3).
VB.2006.00532 · zh (§ 238 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Justification and Right to be Heard
The final decision of dismissal is based on the application of this provision concerning the design and placement of the single-family house, within the scope of the municipal authority's discretion.
VB.2005.00368 · zh (§ 238 Abs. II PBG)
Appeal on Building Permit for Underground Waste Containers in Protected Old Town
The court found that the construction project violates this provision regarding the protection of heritage objects and landscape protection.
VB.2006.00148 · zh (§ 238 Abs. II PBG)
Neighbor v. Municipal Authority Regarding Multi-Family House Approval
The court considered that the good design required in a core zone, according to this paragraph, was not met by the construction project.
VB.2006.00107 · zh (§ 238 Abs. I PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit, Project Modification, and Planning Defect in Lift Crossing
The court discussed the application of this provision regarding the project's classification (Einordnung).
VB.2006.00107 · zh (§ 238 Abs. II PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit, Project Modification, and Planning Defect in Lift Crossing
The court used this provision to assess the visual relationship between the new construction and the protected object.
VB.1999.00344 · zh (§ 238 Abs. I PBG)
Permit Challenge and Administrative Appeal Regarding Advertising Structure
The decision of the appellate body was annulled because it improperly intervened in the discretionary power of the municipal authority regarding the application of this provision.
VB.2004.00489 · zh (§ 238 PBG)
Road Project Approval and Building Line Restrictions
This provision is part of the legal norms cited, indicating it was relevant to the substantive decision regarding the road project.
VB.2004.00199 · zh (§ 238 Abs. I PBG)
Agricultural Building Light Panel Permit Dispute
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and relates to the substantive law assessed, although the final decision focuses on the procedural error (abuse of discretion) in applying the rules.