Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
700.1 PBGLATC CH-ZH

Art. 203 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (371 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 203

1 Schutzobjekte sind

im Wesentlichen unverdorbene Natur- und Kulturlandschaften objekte und

sowie entsprechende Gewässer, samt Ufer und Bewachsung;

Aussichtslagen und Aussichtspunkte;

c.27 Ortskerne, Quartiere, Strassen und Plätze, Gebäudegruppen,

Gebäude und Teile sowie Zugehör von solchen, die als wichtige

Zeugen einer politischen, wirtschaftlichen, sozialen oder bau-

künstlerischen Epoche erhaltenswürdig sind oder die Landschaf-

ten oder Siedlungen wesentlich mitprägen, samt der für ihre Wir-

kung wesentlichen Umgebung;

d.

e.

vorgeschichtliche und geschichtliche Stätten und ortsgebundene

Gegenstände sowie Gebiete von archäologischer Bedeutung;

Naturdenkmäler und Heilquellen;

f.27 wertvolle Park- und Gartenanlagen, Bäume, Baumbestände,

Feldgehölze und Hecken;

g.27 seltene oder vom Aussterben bedrohte Tiere und Pflanzen und

die für ihre Erhaltung nötigen Lebensräume.

2 Über die Schutzobjekte erstellen die für Schutzmassnahmen zu-

ständigen Behörden Inventare. Die Inventare stehen bei den Gemeinde-

verwaltungen am Ort der gelegenen Sache, die überkommunalen über-

dies bei der zuständigen Direktion33, zur Einsichtnahme offen.26

Inventare4

1. 1. 25-127

45

700.1 Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG)

B. Bindung des

Gemeinwesens

C. Schutz-

massnahmen

I. Arten

II. Inhalt

III. Abklärung

und Sicherung

D. Vorsorgliche

Schutz-

massnahmen

I. Mit Inventar

← Art. 202 Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG) Art. 204 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (335)

BRGE.I.Nr.0071.2011 · zh (§ 203 Abs. 1 lit. f PBG)
Property Owner vs. Historical Garden Designation
This provision was used to justify the protection of trees as valuable elements contributing to the neighborhood and streetscape.
VB.2010.00431 · zh (§ 203 Abs. 1 lit. b PBG)
Building Permit Challenge: Cellular Station Near Protected Viewpoint
This provision was cited in connection with § 238 Abs. 2 PBG regarding the classification requirements, which the court ultimately deemed not applicable in the final orders.
VB.2008.00432 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. f PBG)
Appeal Dismissed: Building Permit, Tree Protection, and Established Ground Level
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and relates to the substance of the decision concerning building permits and land use, as the appeal was dismissed based on the merits discussed in the grounds.
VB.2008.00481 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. c PBG)
Museum Expansion Over Historic Gymnasium Preservation
This provision appears in the list of legal norms cited, likely underpinning the court's substantive ruling on protection objects, as the case concerns Denkmalschutz (heritage protection).
VB.2005.00255 · zh (§ 203 Abs. II PBG)
Access to Development Plan Documents and Heritage Inventory Sheets
Cited because the object sheets belonging to the publicly accessible inventory must be made available for inspection.
VB.2000.00312 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. c PBG)
Appeal Regarding Preservation Listing and Demolition Permit Denial
This provision is cited and likely relates to the substance of the decision regarding inventory listing and demolition permits or the proportionality of protection.
VB.2003.00195 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. c PBG)
Restaurant and Train Station Protection Status Appeal Dismissal
Cited in the reasoning to qualify the restaurant and train station as protected objects, which is a central element of the dispute, even though the final order dismisses the appeal.
VB.2008.00432 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. f PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit, Tree Exemption, and Ground Level Determination
This provision was cited in relation to the dismissal of the appeal, likely concerning aspects of land use planning or building regulations involved in the case.
VB.2008.00481 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. c PBG)
Cantonal School Gymnasiums vs. Art Museum Expansion
This provision is cited in the final decision, although the specific application isn't detailed in the brief summary, it is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' accompanying the final judgment.
VB.2010.00577 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. f PBG)
Building Permit, Basement Definition, and Planning Unity Appeal
This provision is listed among the norms cited in the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed in the summary.
VB.2024.00360 · zh (§ 203 Abs. I lit. c PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Quashed Due to Unassessed Potential Protection of Existing Hall
This provision is cited in the section detailing the legal norms applied in the case, suggesting it formed part of the basis for the decision regarding the building permit and potential protection of objects.
VB.2024.00360 · zh (§ 203 Abs. II PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Quashed Due to Unassessed Potential Protection of Existing Hall
This provision is cited in the section detailing the legal norms applied in the case, suggesting it formed part of the basis for the decision regarding the building permit and potential protection of objects.
VB.2024.00360 · zh (§ 203 Abs. III PBG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Quashed Due to Unassessed Potential Protection of Existing Hall
This provision is cited in the section detailing the legal norms applied in the case, suggesting it formed part of the basis for the decision regarding the building permit and potential protection of objects.
BRGE.III.Nr.0080.20 · zh (§ 203 Abs. 1 lit. c PBG)
Historic Villa's Contextual Value Protected Despite Interior Alterations
This provision defines what constitutes a protected object, which is central to the court's decision on whether the building should be protected as a historic monument.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0100.010 · zh (§ 203 Abs. 1 lit. f PBG)
Appeal Against Residential Complex Permit Design and Tree Preservation
This provision concerning protected natural objects (including valuable trees) was central to the objection concerning tree protection, but the court concluded no such protected objects existed on the building site.