700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 16 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 16
1 Die Planungen unterer Stufen haben denjenigen der obern
Stufe, die Nutzungsplanungen jeder Art und Stufe der Richtplanung
zu entsprechen.
2 Abweichungen sind nur zulässig, wenn sie sachlich gerechtfertigt
und untergeordneter Natur sind.27
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (54)
VB.2010.00062 · zh (§ 16 Abs. II PBG)
Municipality Development Plan Exceeding Zoning Discretion
This provision was cited by the court in the reasoning when discussing why a certain argument regarding the size of the area for the development plan was not a valid basis for the Gestaltungsplan.
VB.2010.00555 · zh (§ 16 Abs. I PBG)
Ordinance Amendment Invalid Due to Conflict with Cantonal Development Plan
Cited in the reasoning section which justifies the decision to uphold the appeal based on the violation of the planning hierarchy.
VB.2006.00133 · zh (§ 16 PBG)
Judicial Review of Municipal Zoning for Golf Course Development
Used to evaluate the procedural validity of the competence delegation for the approval of the development plan.
VB.2001.00313 · zh (§ 16 PBG)
Rezoning Challenge and Standing of Conservation Association
This provision appears in the list of cited legal norms associated with the decision, even if its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is listed as a relevant norm.
VB.2010.00062 · zh (§ 16 Abs. II PBG)
Municipal Zoning Plan Rejection Upheld Over Agricultural Zone Expansion
The court found that the argument related to this provision was insufficient to justify the development plan.
VB.2024.00227 · zh (§ 16 PBG)
Appeal Against Multi-Family House Permit Due to Traffic Safety and Fire Access Deficiencies
This provision is implicitly cited as a basis for the decision, as the lack of adequate access due to safety and access issues leads to the denial of the building permit.
VB.2023.00035 · zh (§ 16 Abs. II PBG)
Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended
The court used this provision to assess the conformity of the plan with planning law principles.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0244.202 · zh (§ 16 Abs. 1 PBG)
Municipality v. Cyclist Safety Advocates
Cited for the rule that lower-level planning must comply with higher-level planning, including direct plans.
VB.2021.00601 · zh (§ 16 Abs. I PBG)
Road Users' Standing to Challenge Bicycle Path Routing and Speed Limit, and Planning Authority Discretion
This provision of the cantonal planning and building law is listed among the legal norms cited.
VB.2021.00601 · zh (§ 16 Abs. II PBG)
Road Users' Standing to Challenge Bicycle Path Routing and Speed Limit, and Planning Authority Discretion
This provision of the cantonal planning and building law is listed among the legal norms cited.
BRGE.II.Nr.0149.202 · zh (§ 16 Abs. 1 PBG)
Appeal Against Development Plan Approval Due to Conflict with Core Zone Rooflines
Cited in the reasoning section regarding compliance between different planning levels, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
VB.2018.00760 · zh (§ 16 Abs. II PBG)
Cantonal Development Plan Invalid Due to Lack of Standing and Exceeded Jurisdiction; Court Fee Reduced
The plan's establishment was deemed impermissible and incompatible with cantonal law because it constituted a deviation of more than minor importance.
VB.2019.00198 · zh (§ 16 PBG)
State Road Project Approval Upheld
The court referenced this provision in relation to the competence for approving road projects.
BRGE.II.Nr.0071.201 · zh (§ 16 Abs. 1 PBG)
Municipality v. Cantonal Authority Re Zoning Ordinance Revision
This provision mandates that land-use plans must conform to the master plan, which was the basis for rejecting the extension of the zone that did not conform.
BRGE.II.Nr.0071.201 · zh (§ 16 Abs. 2 PBG)
Municipality v. Cantonal Authority Re Zoning Ordinance Revision
This provision concerning justifiable deviations from the master plan was examined, but ultimately deemed inapplicable as the fundamental conformity was lacking.