700.1
PBGLATC
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 146 : Planungs und Baugesetz (PBG)
Art. 146
1 Der Quartierplan bestimmt, wie die Erstellungskosten F. Erstellungs-
von Erschliessungsanlagen sowie von gemeinschaftlichen Ausstattun- kosten
gen und Ausrüstungen zu tragen sind.
1. 1. 25-127
33
700.1 Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG)
Massgebend ist dabei in erster Linie das Interesse an den betref-
fenden Anlagen.
Zu berücksichtigen ist ferner, ob bei der Überbauung noch wei-
tere eigene Aufwendungen, wie längere Zufahrten und Zugänge, Werk-
leitungen und dergleichen, nötig sein werden, die sich bei andern
Grundstücken wegen ihrer Lage und Form erübrigen, und ob solchen
Nachteilen nicht Vorzüge der rückwärtigen Lage gegenüberstehen.
3. Das Aufstellungsverfahren27
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)
VB.2003.00331 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Appeal Dismissed: Neighborhood Development Plan Challenge and Cost Allocation Upheld
Referred to in the context of the overall scope and application of the Quartierplan procedure.
VB.2003.00331 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Administrative Court Upholds Neighborhood Development Plan Dismissing Appeal on Infrastructure and Cost Allocation
This provision likely underpins the authority or procedure related to the Quartierplan decisions being reviewed.
VB.2010.00420 · zh (§ 146I PBG)
Cost Apportionment for Neighborhood Plan Sidewalk Construction and Procedural Fees
Cited in relation to the cost allocation for the execution costs of the sidewalk.
VB.2023.00321 · zh (§ 146 Abs. I PBG)
Administrative Plan Amendment Admissibility and Cost Distribution Reassessment
Cited in the case summary section, relating to procedural or substantive planning law.
VB.2023.00321 · zh (§ 146 Abs. II PBG)
Administrative Plan Amendment Admissibility and Cost Distribution Reassessment
Cited in the case summary section, relating to procedural or substantive planning law.
VB.2023.00321 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Administrative Plan Amendment Admissibility and Cost Distribution Reassessment
Cited in the case summary section, relating to procedural or substantive planning law.
VB.2018.00798 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Property Owner Challenge to Neighborhood Plan Slope Requirements and Cost Allocation
This provision likely served as the main ground concerning the approval or rejection of the overall Quartierplan concept, as the appeal concerning the substantive revision was rejected.
VB.2020.00029 · zh (§ 146 Abs. I PBG)
Zoning Dispute Over Neighborhood Plan Costs and Rights-of-Way
Cited in relation to the cost allocation for fine development, indicating it's relevant to the dispute.
BRGE.III.Nrn.0101.0 · zh (§ 146 Abs. 1 PBG)
Consolidated Appeal Against Neighborhood Plan Based on Superseding Traffic Regulation and Reassessment of Cost Allocation
Cited in reasoning regarding the determination of costs for development facilities, which is addressed in the dispositive orders concerning cost allocation.
VB.2016.00559 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Property Owner Contribution Upheld for Road Upgrade Under New Neighborhood Plan Standards
This provision is the main legal ground cited in relation to the substantive decision regarding the plan/road.
BRGE.III.Nr.0019.20 · zh (§ 146 Abs. 1 PBG)
Municipal Resolution for Joint Road Access Upheld
Mentioned as a provision allowing community facilities to be required in neighborhood plan procedures.
VB.2011.00346 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Landowner Liability for Noise Protection Costs in Development Plans
Cited as the legal basis for the cost allocation of facilities planned within the zoning plan.
VB.2013.00624 · zh (§ 146 Abs. I PBG)
Zoning Plan Upheld Due to Insufficient Property Access
Cited in relation to the inadmissibility of the appeal.
VB.2013.00055 · zh (§ 146 PBG)
Landowner's Development Interest as Basis for Neighborhood Plan Cost Allocation
This provision concerns land readjustment and is relevant to the court's assessment of the possibility of increased utilization through land readjustment.
VB.2008.00277 · zh (§ 146 Abs. 2 PBG)
Municipality Appeal on Neighborhood Plan Development and Cost Allocation
Basis for requiring the co-owner to participate in the costs of traffic infrastructure development as it leads to an increase in the value of their property.