212.81
GSVGERLTASLTFA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 29 : Gesetz über das Sozialversicherungsgericht (GSVGer)
Art. 29
31 Gegen rechtskräftige Entscheide des Gerichts kann von den
am Verfahren Beteiligten Revision verlangt werden
a. wenn sie neue erhebliche Tatsachen erfahren oder Beweismittel auf-
finden, die sie im früheren Verfahren nicht beibringen konnten,
b. wegen Einwirkung durch Verbrechen oder Vergehen,
c. wenn der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte oder das
Ministerkomitee des Europarates eine Individualbeschwerde wegen
Verletzung der Konvention vom 4. November 1950 zum Schutze der
Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten (EMRK)27 und deren Proto-
kolle gutheisst und eine Wiedergutmachung nur durch eine Revision
möglich ist.
Frist
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (46)
IV.2024.00511 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Appeal for Retroactive Disability Pension Denied
Allows for the revision of legally binding court decisions if new significant facts are learned or evidence is found that could not have been submitted in the previous proceedings.
AL.2024.00074 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Claimant Denied Revision of Unemployment Denial Based on Subsequent Testimony
This cantonal procedural rule defines the conditions for demanding revision against final decisions of the court, which was cited in relation to the grounds for the revision request.
IV.2023.00529 · zh (§ 29 GSVGer)
Claimant Seeks Revision of Denied Disability Benefits Based on Contested Expert Opinion.
This article outlines the conditions under which revision can be requested in cantonal court, which the court used to determine the merits of the revision request.
AL.2023.00027 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Claimant Fails to Reopen Denied Unemployment Benefits with Alleged New Evidence
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for requesting revision of court decisions based on new relevant facts or evidence.
AL.2023.00027 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Revision Denied: Insufficient New Evidence for Unemployment Benefits Reopening
This provision allows for the revision of final court decisions if new substantial facts are discovered or evidence is found that could not have been presented in the previous proceedings.
UV.2022.00210 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Revision Denied: Cervical Dystonia Diagnosis Not Sufficient for Reopening Judgment
Cited as the provision allowing for revision of court decisions based on new facts or evidence.
UV.2022.00210 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Accident Insurance Benefits Revision Denied Due to Untimely and Insufficient New Evidence
Cited as the basis for the possibility of requesting revision of final court decisions.
KV.2020.00035 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Revision for Spinraza Coverage Denied Despite New Study
The appeal for revision was dismissed as no ground for revision under this provision was found.
UV.2020.00018 · zh (§ 29 lit. b GSVGer)
Claimant Seeks Revision Based on Alleged Employer Misrepresentation Regarding Trench Depth, Revision Denied.
This provision outlines the ground for revision based on influence by a crime or misdemeanor, which the court ultimately found unsubstantiated.
IV.2017.01284 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Disability Pension Revision Denied Due to Insufficient New Evidence
Cited as the legal basis for requesting a revision of a court decision due to new facts or evidence.
IV.2018.01064 · zh (§ 29 GSVGer)
Disability Benefits Revision Denied Due to Irrelevant ECHR Ruling on Surveillance
The court dismissed the revision application, which was based on this article.
UV.2018.00057 · zh (§ 29 GSVGer)
Dismissal of Revision for Untimely Submission of Expert Opinion in Insurance Benefit Dispute
This provision outlines the grounds for revision under cantonal law, which the court used to assess the admissibility of the revision request (though ultimately finding the grounds for new evidence were not met).
AK.2018.00006 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Former Board Member Denied Revision of Liability for Unpaid Social Security Contributions
This provision specifies the conditions under which revision of a final court decision can be requested, namely the discovery of new, significant facts or evidence that could not have been presented in the original proceedings.
IV.2017.01150 · zh (§ 29 lit. a GSVGer)
Disability Benefits Revision Denied Due to Insufficient "Considerable" Change in Earnings
Cited as the basis for the revision request, but ultimately found not to be met.
IV.2017.00650 · zh (§ 29 GSVGer)
Claimant's Failure to Ensure Receipt of Judicial Documents Justifies Denial of Reinstatement and Revision Requests
This article was cited as the basis for the denied petition for revision.