Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
211.17 SDVOSL CH-ZH

Art. 9 : Sprachdienstleistungsverordnung (SDV)

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (28 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 9

Die antragstellende Person muss

a. die Amtssprache und die Arbeitssprache in Wort und Schrift beherr-

schen,

b. über einen fundierten juristischen Grundwortschatz in der Amts-

sprache und der Arbeitssprache sowie eine umfassende Allgemein-

bildung verfügen,

Fachliche

Voraus-

setzungen

1.7.24 - 125

3

211.17

Sprachdienstleistungsverordnung (SDV)

c. Sprachdienstleistungen, für die sie um Akkreditierung ersucht, fach-

gerecht erbringen können,

d. über ein professionelles Rollenverständnis verfügen,

e. eine von der Fachgruppe bezeichnete Aus- oder Weiterbildung be-

sucht und die vorgegebenen Prüfungen bestanden haben.

Persönliche

Voraus-

setzungen

Verfahren

Wirkung

← Art. 8 Sprachdienstleistungsverordnung (SDV) Art. 10 →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)

VR240011 · zh (§ 9 lit. c und d SDV)
Appeal Against Interpreter Accreditation Revocation Overturned
These provisions regarding professional service delivery and professional role understanding were discussed in the reasoning leading to the decision to overturn the revocation.
VR240002 · zh (§ 9 lit. e SDV)
Language Service Provider Accreditation Appeal Dismissed Over Examination Failure
Cited in the reasoning as the mandatory prerequisite for accreditation, which justifies the dismissal of the appeal regarding the accreditation requirement.
VR240003 · zh (§ 9 lit. e SDV)
Accreditation Denial Upheld Due to Examination Failure
Cited as the mandatory prerequisite (passing the qualifying examination) for accreditation, which the appellant failed to meet.
VR220016 · zh (§ 9 lit. a SDV)
Translator Accreditation Denial Upheld for Dialect Proficiency
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not meet the requirement of excellent language skills specified in this article, as concluded in section 4.6.
VR220001 · zh (§ 9 lit. b SDV)
Interpreter Accreditation Revocation Appeal
This provision setting requirements for accredited persons is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision, but not explicitly in the final orders.
VR220001 · zh (§ 9 lit. c SDV)
Interpreter Accreditation Revocation Appeal
This provision setting requirements for accredited persons is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision, but not explicitly in the final orders.
VR220001 · zh (§ 9 lit. d SDV)
Interpreter Accreditation Revocation Appeal
This provision setting requirements for accredited persons is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision, but not explicitly in the final orders.
VR200001 · zh (§ 9 lit. b SDV)
Translator Accreditation Revoked for Lack of Recent Practical Experience
Cited as a prerequisite for maintaining accreditation, specifically regarding the requirement for a sound legal vocabulary.
VR200001 · zh (§ 9 lit. d SDV)
Translator Accreditation Revoked for Lack of Recent Practical Experience
Cited as a prerequisite for maintaining accreditation, specifically regarding the requirement for a professional understanding of the role.
VR210004 · zh (§ 9 lit. d SDV)
Interpreter Accreditation Withdrawal Upheld After Role Violations in Sexual Assault Interview
This provision is mentioned in the reasoning (E. 3.1, 3.5, 3.9.7) as the substantive basis for final withdrawal of accreditation, but is *not* cited in the operative section (Order 1.b).
VR240002 · zh (§ 9 lit. e SDV)
Accreditation Denial Upheld Following Failed Qualification Exam
Cited implicitly in the final reasoning as a mandatory requirement for accreditation, which the appellant failed to meet.