132.1
FAGLPF
CH-ZH
Art. 23 : Finanzausgleichsgesetz (FAG)
Art. 23
Der individuelle Sonderlastenausgleich gleicht besondere Ziel
Lasten einer politischen Gemeinde aus, die
a. von ihr nicht beeinflusst werden können und
b. weder vom demografischen Sonderlastenausgleich noch vom geo-
grafisch-topografischen Sonderlastenausgleich abgegolten werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (7)
VB.2016.00787 · zh (Art. 23 FAG)
Special Burden Equalization: Final Determination and Expenditure Influence
This provision likely concerns the scope or definitions within the financial equalization law.
VB.2016.00788 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. 1 FAG)
Municipality Special Burden Equalization Payment Reduction Appeal
This provision was cited, likely concerning the general framework for the financial equalization, which underpins the decision.
VB.2016.00789 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. 1 FAG)
Municipality Equalization Payment Reduction Appeal Sustained
Cited in the legal norms section, relevant to the determination of the special burden compensation.
VB.2016.00786 · zh (Art./§ 23 FAG)
Special Burden Equalization Payment Assessment and Municipal Expenditure Calculation
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms used, implying its relevance to the decision's core subject matter (Sonderlastenausgleich).
VB.2016.00787 · zh (Art. 23 FAG)
Municipality's Special Burden Equalization Reduction Unlawful Due to Inappropriate Resource Comparison
The court referred to this provision in the context of the resource comparison used by the municipal office.
VB.2016.00788 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. 1 FAG)
Municipality's Right to Influence Special Burden Equalization Through Expenditure Adjustments
This article (among others) is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' which are the legal bases for the decision's substance, although the specific disposition orders are not fully visible, this provision is cited as relevant context to the ruling.
VB.2016.00789 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. 1 FAG)
Municipality's Special Burden Equalization Payment Reduction Overturned
This article is cited in the Rechtsnormen section associated with the substantive ruling, implying its use in determining the outcome regarding the individual special burden equalization.