836.1
AGFAMZGLALAFAM
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 18 Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur les allocations familiales (LALAFam) - Retrait de la reconnaissance
Régimes d'allocations familiales - Salariés exerçant une activité non agricole
Art. 18 LALAFam · Retrait de la reconnaissance
1. Le Conseil d'Etat peut impartir aux caisses reconnues un délai convenable pour se conformer à la présente loi. A défaut, il peut leur retirer la reconnaissance et ordonner la dissolution des caisses créées sur le plan cantonal, sous réserve des sanctions pénales.
2. Les réserves légales sont versées aux nouvelles caisses ou à défaut à la Caisse cantonale d'allocations familiales.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (13)
A/3636/2017 · ge (Art. 18 al. 1 LAF)
Restitution of Training Allowances and Limitation Period for Autonomous Entities
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the status of the SCAF.
5V 16 373 · lu (Art. 18 Abs. 1 FLG)
Shareholder-Employees in Family Agricultural Corporations Subject to Mandatory Social Insurance Contributions
The appeal was rejected because the wages paid to the participating shareholders were correctly subject to the contribution liability according to this provision.
A/2096/2014 · ge (art. 18 al. 3 LAF)
Family Allowance Offset Against Unpaid Social Security Contributions
This article was cited to establish that CAFNA is an autonomous public law institution, enabling compensation across institutions.
39.2004.7 · ti (Art. 18 cpv. 1 v.LAF)
Claimant Ordered to Reimburse Overpaid Family Allowances Due to Failure to Report Change in Circumstances
Cited to justify the pro-rata entitlement (50%) to the allowance once the condition of full-time employment equivalence with the other parent was no longer met (after the ex-husband's death).
39.2004.7 · ti (Art. 18 cpv. 2 v.LAF)
Claimant Ordered to Reimburse Overpaid Family Allowances Due to Failure to Report Change in Circumstances
Cited as the former legal basis justifying the full allowance when the sum of both parents' employment reached full-time equivalent, which was the situation before April 1999.
A/1729/2002 · ge (art. 18, 21 et 30 de la loi genevoise sur les allocations familiales (LAF ; J 5 10))
Company Appeal Regarding 2001 Family Allowance Contribution Assessment
These articles, concerning the basis for setting contributions, are cited in the reasoning but not in the operative part (orders 1-4).
39.2000.98 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 LAF)
Appeal Regarding Family Allowance Calculation and Eligibility
Cited in the reasoning leading to the conclusion that the basic allowance was calculated incorrectly for the period when the appellant worked part-time (50%).
39.2001.21 · ti (art. 18 LAF)
Family Allowance Entitlement: Shared Custody with One Parent Employed Abroad
This article concerning the amount determination was cited in the reasoning section but not in the final orders.
39.2001.34 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 LAF)
Wife's Entitlement to Family Allowances Over Husband's Foreign Employment
Cited in the grounds for the decision concerning the calculation of the allowance amount in proportion to the mother's partial employment.
39.2000.98 · ti (Art. 18 cpv. 1 LAF)
Mother's Appeal of Family Allowance Rejection Over Deductible Expenses
This article, cited in the reasoning to correct the calculation of the basic allowance, is central to the final calculation that resulted in the rejection of the appeal (point 2.12 and 2.13).
39.2001.34 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 LAF)
Family Allowance Entitlement for Custodial Parent with Partial Employment Versus Non-Salaried Cross-Border Parent.
Used to determine that the insured mother is entitled to half the basic allowance proportional to her 50% degree of occupation.
39.2001.8 · ti (art. 18 LAF)
Father's Family Allowance Claim vs. Ticino Fund Regarding Employed Mother Abroad
Cited in the reasoning regarding the calculation of the allowance in specific frontier worker cases, but not in the operative orders.
39.2004.7 · ti (Art. 18 cpv. 1 v.LAF)
Family Allowance Overpayment Repayment Due to Failure to Notify Death
Cited implicitly (point 2.10) as the basis for establishing the proportionally reduced allowance the insured should have received after the husband's death.