705.1 BAUGLC

CH-VS

Art. 57 Loi sur les constructions (LC) - Délai et motifs

Autorisation de construire - Procédure d'autorisation de construire - Opposition

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (88 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 57 LC · Délai et motifs

1. Le délai d’opposition est de 30 jours à compter de la publication dans le Bulletin officiel.

2. Les motifs de l’opposition ne peuvent porter que sur la violation de dispositions de droit public.

← Art. 56 LC Loi sur les constructions (LC) - But et champ d'application Art. 58 LC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)

A3 24 20 · vs (art. 57 al. 2 LC)

Construction Company Fined for Unauthorised and Non-Compliant Retaining Walls

Cited in consideration 4 regarding the possibility of regularization, but not in the dispositive orders.

A1 22 50 · vs (Art. 57 Abs. 2 BauG)

Property Owner Terrain Adjustments Permit Dispute

The provision cited for granting the appellant a reasonable period to submit a building application after annulling the previous decision.

A1 20 77 · vs (art. 57 al. 1 et 2 LC)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Terrace Construction Legality and Alterations

The court ordered the case returned to the municipality to initiate a regularization procedure for the unauthorized works on the terrace, as per these articles.

A1 20 39 · vs (art. 57 al. 3 LC)

Chalet Demolition Upheld Despite Owner's Status

Cited in the order to instruct the Cantonal Commission of Constructions on the specific requirements for the demolition order to be issued.

A1 20 161 · vs (art. 57 al. 2 LC)

Property Owner v. Municipality (Photovoltaic Panel Removal)

The instruction for the municipality to issue a new decision requiring integration (rather than demolition) references the procedure for regularization when an initial removal order is deemed disproportionate.

A1 20 159 · vs (Art. 57 Abs. 2 BauG)

Property Owner Appeal Against Restoration Order for Unauthorized Building Modifications

This provision was discussed by the appellant as the correct procedure, but the court found Art. 57 Abs. 3 BauG applicable instead, meaning it was considered but ultimately not applied as the main ground for the order.

A1 20 159 · vs (Art. 57 Abs. 3 BauG)

Property Owner Appeal Against Restoration Order for Unauthorized Building Modifications

The court confirmed that the conditions for applying the simplified procedure for restoration without granting time to file a building application were met regarding the winter gardens/oriels.

A1 20 194 · vs (Art. 56, 57 und 58 BauG)

Property Co-owners v. Municipality Over Enforcement of Noise and Nuisance Regulations

Mentioned in the reasoning as provisions the municipality was instructed to check regarding compliance with building regulations, but they are NOT cited in the dispositive orders.

A1 20 194 · vs (Art. 57 Abs. 4 des Baugesetzes vom 15. Dezember 2016 (BauG; SGS/VS 705.1))

Property Co-owners v. Municipality Over Enforcement of Noise and Nuisance Regulations

Mentioned in the factual summary by the appellants as a provision whose expiry period (prescription) was allegedly relevant, but it is NOT cited in the dispositive orders.

A1 20 42 · vs (Art. 57 al. 2 LC)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Demolition of Unstable Dry-Stone Wall

The court found that the municipal council failed to comply with this article by not offering the appellant the possibility to file a building permit application for regularization.

TCVS A1 20 42 · vs (art. 57 al. 2 LC)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Demolition Order and Right to Regularization Permit

The court admitted the appeal because the Commune failed to grant the appellant the possibility to regularize the construction by submitting a building permit application, which is contrary to this article.