616.1
SUBGLSUB
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 30 Loi sur les subventions (LSub) - Dispositions pénales
Protection juridique et dispositions pénales
Art. 30 LSub · Dispositions pénales
1. Celui qui, en vue d'obtenir une subvention, donne sur des faits importants des indications inexactes ou incomplètes, ou tait de tels faits, est puni par le département concerné d'une amende pouvant aller jusqu'à 20'000 francs.
2. Si l'auteur du délit a agi à son profit, l'amende pourra s'élever à 100'000 francs au plus.
3. La restitution de la subvention pourra être exigée en sus.
4. La négligence n'est pas punissable.
5. L'instigation et la complicité sont punissables.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (51)
B-6837/2024 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 SuG)
Innovation Grant Revoked Due to SME Status Change Post-Takeover
This provision is cited as the legal basis for reclaiming already disbursed contributions upon revocation of a subsidy.
B-995/2023 (Art. 30 SuG)
Livestock Conservation Grant Dispute: Contractual vs. Administrative Procedure
Cited in the context of revocation of financial aid decisions.
A-3781/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)
Road Safety Project Funding Dispute Over Substantiated Costs
Cited as the legal basis for revoking a subsidy decision if it was wrongly granted due to a violation of legal provisions or an incorrect/incomplete factual basis.
A-2894/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)
BAKOM v. Radio Broadcaster: Pension Fund Remediation Provision Not Eligible for COVID-19 Subsidy Repayment Calculation
The provision that the competent authority must revoke a financial aid decision if it was granted unjustly due to a violation of legal provisions or an incorrect or incomplete determination of the facts.
A-2894/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 Satz 1 SuG)
BAKOM v. Radio Broadcaster: Pension Fund Remediation Provision Not Eligible for COVID-19 Subsidy Repayment Calculation
The provision that the authority, when revoking a financial aid decision, shall reclaim the amounts already paid.
A-2895/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)
Radio Broadcaster's COVID-19 Subsidy Recalled Due to Overstated Profit
Used to partially revoke the initial decision and reclaim unduly paid financial aid.
A-2895/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 Satz 1 SuG)
Radio Broadcaster's COVID-19 Subsidy Recalled Due to Overstated Profit
Basis for reclaiming the excess financial aid that was paid out.
A-2897/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)
Broadcaster's COVID-19 Aid Recovery Upheld Over Pension Fund Provision
Cited as the legal basis for the authority to withdraw a subsidy decision.
A-2897/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 Satz 1 SuG)
Broadcaster's COVID-19 Aid Recovery Upheld Over Pension Fund Provision
Cited for the authority to reclaim unduly paid subsidies.
A-1431/2022 (Art. 30 al. 1 LSu)
Media Company Repays Pandemic Funds Due to Improper Asset Amortization
Cited as the legal basis for revoking a decision granting aid when the benefit was unduly allocated due to an inaccurate or incomplete factual situation.
A-1431/2022 (Art. 30 al. 2 LSu)
Media Company Repays Pandemic Funds Due to Improper Asset Amortization
Cited to assess the conditions under which the competent authority may waive the revocation of a decision granting aid.
A-4488/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)
Transport Company v. Federal Office of Transport: Subsidy Reimbursement and Trust Protection on Interest Calculation
The court used this article to determine the conditions under which a subsidy decision can be revoked, which was the basis for the dispute.
A-4488/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 2 SuG)
Transport Company v. Federal Office of Transport: Subsidy Reimbursement and Trust Protection on Interest Calculation
This article was considered to determine if there were grounds for waiving the revocation of subsidies.
A-4488/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 SuG)
Transport Company v. Federal Office of Transport: Subsidy Reimbursement and Trust Protection on Interest Calculation
This article was used to justify the charging of interest on reclaimed subsidies due to culpable conduct.
A-1484/2022 (Art. 30 al. 1 LSu)
Broadcaster Ordered to Repay COVID Subsidy Due to Insufficient Financial Transparency
Ground for revoking the decision to grant aid when the benefit was unduly awarded.