Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
455.1 AGTSCHGLALPA CH-VS

Art. 16 Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur la protection des animaux (LALPA) - Police

Organes compétents - Organes d'exécution
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (61 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 16 LALPA · Police

1. Les autorités de surveillance, d'exécution et pénales peuvent faire appel à l'aide de la police cantonale, des polices communales et des polices intercommunales.

2. La police prête son concours pour permettre d'éclaircir les infractions présumées à la législation sur la protection des animaux.

3. Elle surveille le transport des animaux.

4. La police et les autres organes d'exécution doivent coordonner leurs activités de façon à garantir la protection des animaux et sauvegarder les éléments utiles aux enquêtes judiciaires.

5. Cette collaboration n'est pas indemnisée.

← Art. 15 LALPA Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur la protection des animaux (LALPA) - But Art. 17 LALPA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (15)

SB240092 · zh (Art. 16 Abs. 2 lit. a TSchV)
State v. Accused: Attempted Animal Cruelty via Insufficient Poison Bait
Provision cited in conjunction with the conviction for attempted animal cruelty.
460.23.181 · bl (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. a TSchG i.V.m. Art. 3 lit. a TSchG und Art. 4 Abs. 2 TSchG i.V.m. Art. 16 Abs. 1 TSchV)
Farmer Acquitted of Animal Cruelty in Fawn Incident, Convicted of Appropriating Dead Animal
Cited in the first dispositive order of the original judgment regarding animal cruelty (mistreatment of an animal).
SK 2023 5 · be (Art. 16 Abs. 2 Bst. c TSchV)
Farmer Convicted of Animal Cruelty for Shooting Cats Despite Defense of Necessity
Cited in the dispositive regarding the application of sentencing provisions related to animal cruelty.
SK 2020 9 · be (Art. 16 Abs. 1, 155 Abs. 1 TSchV)
Veterinarian Convicted for False Certification and Animal Cruelty in Cattle Transport
These articles of the Animal Protection Ordinance were used to establish guilt for animal cruelty regarding transport conditions.
D.cision.2021.36 · vd (Art. 16 al. 2 OPAn)
Appeal Regarding Refusal to Prosecute Property Damage and Animal Cruelty Claims
This provision, concerning specific prohibitions under animal protection, was discussed in relation to the material scope of the initial non-entry decision, which was upheld.
SK 2019 407 · be (Art. 16 Abs. 1 TSchV)
Livestock Owner Convicted of Animal Cruelty for Delayed Hoof Care of Sheep
Cited in the operative part (II) related to the conviction, concerning specific requirements for animal keeping (implicitly related to health/care).
SK 2019 77 · be (Art. 16 Abs. 2 lit. f TSchV)
Upheld Fraud and Drug Convictions; Sentence Increased to 22 Months
Cited in the framework for determining the overall sentence.
SK 2017 38 · be (Art. 16 Abs. 1 TSchV)
Animal Welfare Violation: Persistent Neglect of Cats
Cited concerning the prohibition of neglecting animals.
SB150385 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. b TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 16 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 lit. a TSchV)
Hunting Lessee Convicted for Inhumane Dispatch of Injured Fox
This provision is cited in the dispositive order (Order 1) as the basis for convicting the accused.
SB110758 · zh (Art. 16 Abs. 1 TSchV)
State v. [Accused Name] (Animal Cruelty Appeal)
Cited in the conviction for the attempted offense against the Animal Welfare Act.
SB110255 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. a TschG in Verbindung mit Art. 16 Abs. 2 lit. j TSchV)
Sexual Coercion and Cruelty Conviction Upheld; Inpatient Treatment Ordered
The defendant was convicted for animal cruelty under these provisions in the final orders.
SB110255 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. a TschG in Verbindung mit Art. 16 Abs. 2 lit. j TSchV)
Sexual Coercion, Child Sexual Abuse, Child Pornography, Animal Cruelty Conviction Upheld with Therapeutic Measure
The defendant was convicted for animal cruelty under these connected provisions.
SB110758 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. a TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 3 lit. a und lit. b Ziff. 4 und Art. 4 Abs. 2 TSchG sowie Art. 2 lit. a, Art. 16 Abs. 1 und Art. 73 Abs. 2 der Tierschutzverordnung (TSchV))
State v. Defendant (Animal Cruelty Attempt)
This provision describes the offense ('Versuch zum Vergehen gegen das Tierschutzgesetz') for which the accused was convicted in the final operative part (Dispositiv Ziffer 1).
SB150385 · zh (Art. 26 Abs. 1 lit. b TSchG in Verbindung mit Art. 16 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 lit. a TSchV)
Hunting Leaseholder Convicted for Cruel Killing of Injured Fox
This provision is cited in the dispositive (Order 1) as the basis for finding the defendant guilty of the primary offense (infringement of animal protection law).
SB240092 · zh (Art. 16 Abs. 2 lit. a TSchV)
Zurich Higher Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Severe Animal Cruelty in Wolf Poisoning Case
This provision is cited alongside Art. 26 TSchG as part of the substantive legal basis for the conviction in the final order (Erkannt 1).